Loading...

Justices Reject Graham Bid to Block Georgia Testimony

November 1, 2022 by Dan McCue
Justices Reject Graham Bid to Block Georgia Testimony
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington (Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool, File)

WASHINGTON — Just hours after Chief Justice John Roberts handed former President Donald Trump a temporary victory in one of his legal battles, a member of Trump’s inner circle on Tuesday found the high court far less accommodating.

In an unsigned, two-paragraph order, the Supreme Court rejected a petition from Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to temporarily block a subpoena seeking his testimony before a Georgia grand jury investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Graham had originally submitted his emergency petition to Justice Clarence Thomas, who handles such matters in the Atlanta, Georgia–based 11th Circuit, and Thomas had imposed an administrative stay to give his fellow justices time to weigh in on Graham’s request for relief.

Graham had argued that as a sitting senator he could not be compelled to testify about any activity related to his official duties. 

“Without a stay, Sen. Lindsey Graham will soon be questioned by a local Georgia prosecutor and her ad hoc investigative body about his protected ‘speech or debate’ related to the 2020 election,” former White House counsel Donald McGahn wrote in the emergency application. 

“This will occur despite the Constitution’s command that senators ‘shall not be questioned’ about ‘any speech or debate.’ It will occur in state court, without the consent of the federal government,” he said.

Prosecutors in Fulton County, Georgia, reportedly want to question him about a call he made to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in which he inquired about the handling of absentee ballots in the 2020 election.

While Graham claims he and his office would be irreparably harmed if he’s forced to testify, the prosecutors maintain it is the special grand jury overseeing the investigation that will be harmed even with a temporary delay in his testimony.

Further, wrote Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in her response to Graham’s filing, “The 11th Circuit has approved an orderly process of questioning proposed by the district court, wherein Sen. Graham is immune from questioning regarding legislative activities and can resolve any future disputes under supervision of the federal courts.”

The two-paragraph order from the Supreme Court gave no indication whether any of the justices opposed not granting the stay, and there were no dissents appended to it.

“The lower courts assumed that the informal investigative fact-finding that Sen. Graham assertedly engaged in constitutes legislative activity protected by the speech or debate clause, U.S. Const. Art. I, §6, cl. 1, and they held that Sen. Graham may not be questioned about such activities,” the justices wrote. “The lower courts also made clear that Sen. Graham may return to the district court should disputes arise regarding the application of the speech or debate clause immunity to specific questions. 

“Accordingly, a stay or injunction is not necessary to safeguard the senator’s speech or debate clause immunity,” they said.

Dan can be reached at dan@thewellnews.com and @DanMcCue

In The News

Health

Voting

Supreme Court

January 19, 2023
by Dan McCue
Capitol Police Announce Road Closures Ahead of ‘March for Life’

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Capitol Police have announced Capitol Complex road closures to accommodate the annual “March for Life” on... Read More

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Capitol Police have announced Capitol Complex road closures to accommodate the annual “March for Life” on the National Mall. Thousands of anti-abortion activists and marchers are expected to converge on the National Mall Thursday and Friday for a series of events. This... Read More

January 19, 2023
by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Investigation Hasn’t Turned Up Abortion Ruling Leaker

WASHINGTON — A monthslong internal investigation has failed to identify the person who leaked a draft copy of the Dobbs... Read More

WASHINGTON — A monthslong internal investigation has failed to identify the person who leaked a draft copy of the Dobbs ruling to Politico last year, the Supreme Court announced Thursday. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization is the landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in... Read More

Supreme Court Lets New York Enforce Gun Law During Lawsuit

WASHINGTON (AP) — New York can for now continue to enforce a sweeping new law that bans guns from “sensitive places” such... Read More

WASHINGTON (AP) — New York can for now continue to enforce a sweeping new law that bans guns from “sensitive places” such as schools, playgrounds and Times Square, the Supreme Court said Wednesday, allowing the law to be in force while a lawsuit over it plays out. The justices turned... Read More

Supreme Court Asked to Bar Punishment for Acquitted Conduct

WASHINGTON (AP) — A jury convicted Dayonta McClinton of robbing a CVS pharmacy but acquitted him of murder. A judge... Read More

WASHINGTON (AP) — A jury convicted Dayonta McClinton of robbing a CVS pharmacy but acquitted him of murder. A judge gave McClinton an extra 13 years in prison for the killing anyway. In courtrooms across America, defendants get additional prison time for crimes that juries found... Read More

December 28, 2022
by Dan McCue
Justices Hold Title 42 to Remain in Place Pending Expedited Review

WASHINGTON —  A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday held that Title 42, the pandemic-era rule that restricted migration at the... Read More

WASHINGTON —  A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday held that Title 42, the pandemic-era rule that restricted migration at the southwestern border on public health grounds, will remain in place pending an expedited ruling and future ruling by the justices. In a brief, unsigned order, a... Read More

December 8, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Minister Says He Successfully Lobbied Supreme Court Justices for His Causes

WASHINGTON — An evangelical minister who on Thursday claimed to be a whistleblower on conflicts of interest at the Supreme... Read More

WASHINGTON — An evangelical minister who on Thursday claimed to be a whistleblower on conflicts of interest at the Supreme Court told Congress that for years he recruited “stealth missionaries” to advocate conservative causes to the justices. The wealthy couples Robert L. Schenck said he used... Read More

News From The Well