Justices Reject Graham Bid to Block Georgia Testimony
WASHINGTON — Just hours after Chief Justice John Roberts handed former President Donald Trump a temporary victory in one of his legal battles, a member of Trump’s inner circle on Tuesday found the high court far less accommodating.
In an unsigned, two-paragraph order, the Supreme Court rejected a petition from Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to temporarily block a subpoena seeking his testimony before a Georgia grand jury investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Graham had originally submitted his emergency petition to Justice Clarence Thomas, who handles such matters in the Atlanta, Georgia–based 11th Circuit, and Thomas had imposed an administrative stay to give his fellow justices time to weigh in on Graham’s request for relief.
Graham had argued that as a sitting senator he could not be compelled to testify about any activity related to his official duties.
“Without a stay, Sen. Lindsey Graham will soon be questioned by a local Georgia prosecutor and her ad hoc investigative body about his protected ‘speech or debate’ related to the 2020 election,” former White House counsel Donald McGahn wrote in the emergency application.
“This will occur despite the Constitution’s command that senators ‘shall not be questioned’ about ‘any speech or debate.’ It will occur in state court, without the consent of the federal government,” he said.
Prosecutors in Fulton County, Georgia, reportedly want to question him about a call he made to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in which he inquired about the handling of absentee ballots in the 2020 election.
While Graham claims he and his office would be irreparably harmed if he’s forced to testify, the prosecutors maintain it is the special grand jury overseeing the investigation that will be harmed even with a temporary delay in his testimony.
Further, wrote Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in her response to Graham’s filing, “The 11th Circuit has approved an orderly process of questioning proposed by the district court, wherein Sen. Graham is immune from questioning regarding legislative activities and can resolve any future disputes under supervision of the federal courts.”
The two-paragraph order from the Supreme Court gave no indication whether any of the justices opposed not granting the stay, and there were no dissents appended to it.
“The lower courts assumed that the informal investigative fact-finding that Sen. Graham assertedly engaged in constitutes legislative activity protected by the speech or debate clause, U.S. Const. Art. I, §6, cl. 1, and they held that Sen. Graham may not be questioned about such activities,” the justices wrote. “The lower courts also made clear that Sen. Graham may return to the district court should disputes arise regarding the application of the speech or debate clause immunity to specific questions.
“Accordingly, a stay or injunction is not necessary to safeguard the senator’s speech or debate clause immunity,” they said.
In The News
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court heard a case Monday in which a victory for the defendant would make it... Read More
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court heard a case Monday in which a victory for the defendant would make it harder to prosecute public corruption cases when one of the accused is a private citizen. Statements by the justices during the hearing indicated they believed Justice... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration on Tuesday afternoon extended its pause of federal student loan repayments to June 30, 2023,... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration on Tuesday afternoon extended its pause of federal student loan repayments to June 30, 2023, saying the move was necessary to give the U.S. Supreme Court time to rule in a case challenging the program. “I'm confident that our student debt... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court gave former President Donald Trump a little less to be thankful for this Thursday, clearing... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court gave former President Donald Trump a little less to be thankful for this Thursday, clearing the path for the imminent handing over of his tax returns to a congressional committee. As is their custom, the justices did not explain the rationale... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said his panel is reviewing “serious allegations” in a report... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said his panel is reviewing “serious allegations” in a report that a former anti-abortion leader knew in advance the outcome of a 2014 Supreme Court case involving health care coverage of contraception. The report Saturday in The New York... Read More
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for the House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan.... Read More
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for the House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol to access phone records belonging to the Arizona Republican Party’s chairwoman. As is their long-standing custom, the justices did not explain... Read More
WASHINGTON — For the second week in a row, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court showed that trying to... Read More
WASHINGTON — For the second week in a row, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court showed that trying to get the law right is a marathon, not a sprint. For roughly four hours on Wednesday, the justices weighed arguments in a consolidated challenge to Congress’... Read More