Internet Companies Tell Supreme Court They Should Not Be Liable for Terrorism

February 21, 2023 by Tom Ramstack
Internet Companies Tell Supreme Court They Should Not Be Liable for Terrorism
The Supreme Court building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court showed minimal interest Tuesday in reducing the legal protections for internet companies over inflammatory information their users post online.

The court’s greater concern was unleashing a flood of lawsuits that could drive technology companies out of business if they eliminate their liability exemptions under Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

“Lawsuits will be nonstop,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh said during oral arguments.

He was responding to arguments from an attorney representing the family of 23-year-old American student Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed during ISIS attacks in Paris, France, in November 2015. The series of terrorist attacks killed 130 people.


Her family sued YouTube and its parent company Google, saying the algorithms they use for their recommender system contributed to the attacks. The recommender systems tailor content based on profiles of users and their history of internet searches.

The Gonzalez family argued YouTube led users to ISIS recruitment videos that radicalized Muslim sympathizers and helped to compel the Paris attack.

Google defended by invoking Section 230’s immunity from liability for content published on an internet service provider’s platform by third-party users.

The Gonzalez case is one of two cases the Supreme Court is hearing this week that accuse internet giants of failing to prevent user postings that contribute to crime and terrorism. Together, the cases could transform the control of Big Tech companies over information posted on their websites, according to legal analysts.

With worldwide users, Google says it is impractical to police all of the content posted on YouTube and other social media platforms.

Google won in federal court at both the trial level and on appeal.

Liberal and conservative Supreme Court justices said Tuesday that the consequences of reducing legal protections for internet companies could be more damaging than holding them liable for irresponsible postings.

Chief Justice John Roberts said that if the same algorithms direct users to a wide variety of interests, such as consumer products, it would be difficult to prove the companies were inciting terrorism.


“Then it might be harder for you to say that there’s selection involved for which you can be held responsible,” Roberts said.

Justice Elena Kagan told the plaintiffs’ attorney, “You are creating a world of lawsuits. Really, anytime you have content, you also have these presentational and prioritization choices that can be subject to suit.”

The Gonzalez family argued in its brief to the Supreme Court that regardless of whether the internet recommendations are done automatically by algorithms, Section 230 was never intended to protect the kind of content that encourages terrorism.

“Interactive computer services constantly direct such recommendations, in one form or another, at virtually every adult and child in the United States who uses social media,” the Gonzalez petition says.

The related case the Supreme Court is hearing Wednesday is Twitter v. Taamneh.  

The case considers whether social media platforms could be liable under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 for postings that encourage terrorism.

The lawsuit was filed by the family of Jordanian citizen Nawras Alassaf, who died in a 2017 ISIS attack in Istanbul, Turkey. The Alassaf family sued Twitter, Google and Facebook.

Twitter argued that holding it liable would expand the scope of the Antiterrorism Act far beyond what Congress intended.

Twitter, Google and Facebook lost at the trial level. On appeal to the Supreme Court, Twitter argued that holding the company liable would mean the act was a “statute of impossible breadth.”

It would be the equivalent of making banks and rental car companies liable if terrorists used their services to assist in an attack, Twitter’s attorneys argued.


The case is Gonzalez et al. v. Google in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and Twitter

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Supreme Court

March 24, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Senate Bill Would Require Cameras in Supreme Court

WASHINGTON — A bill introduced in the Senate last week would require the Supreme Court to televise its hearings. Senators... Read More

WASHINGTON — A bill introduced in the Senate last week would require the Supreme Court to televise its hearings. Senators who introduced the bill said it would help to ensure transparency and better public understanding of how the court operates. “Rulings made by justices in our... Read More

Supreme Court Remembering Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a champion for women's rights whose death ahead of the 2020 election allowed the... Read More

WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a champion for women's rights whose death ahead of the 2020 election allowed the Supreme Court to become more conservative, will be remembered during ceremonies Friday at the high court. Ginsburg, who served as a justice for 27 years and... Read More

February 28, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Supreme Court Reviews Biden Plan to Forgive $400B in Student Debt 

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative majority showed skepticism during a hearing Tuesday of the Biden administration’s authority to forgive... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative majority showed skepticism during a hearing Tuesday of the Biden administration’s authority to forgive more than $400 billion in student debt. The Education Department is invoking the national emergency created by the COVID-19 pandemic to eliminate as much as $20,000... Read More

February 27, 2023
by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Holds Oil Rig Supervisor Paid $200K Owed Overtime

WASHINGTON — An oil rig supervisor who earned as much as $248,000 a year working for Houston, Texas-based Helix Energy... Read More

WASHINGTON — An oil rig supervisor who earned as much as $248,000 a year working for Houston, Texas-based Helix Energy Solutions Group was entitled to additional overtime pay after his dismissal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week. The case, Helix Energy Solutions Group v. Hewitt,... Read More

February 21, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Internet Companies Tell Supreme Court They Should Not Be Liable for Terrorism

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court showed minimal interest Tuesday in reducing the legal protections for internet companies over inflammatory... Read More

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court showed minimal interest Tuesday in reducing the legal protections for internet companies over inflammatory information their users post online. The court’s greater concern was unleashing a flood of lawsuits that could drive technology companies out of business if they eliminate... Read More

February 13, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Pressure Mounts on Supreme Court to Adopt a Code of Ethics for Itself

WASHINGTON — Political pressure is mounting on the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics for itself similar... Read More

WASHINGTON — Political pressure is mounting on the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics for itself similar to the one that binds all other federal courts. In a move last week, members of Congress reintroduced a bill that could compel a code of... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top