High Court Declines to Block Biden Greenhouse Gas Policy

May 27, 2022 by Dan McCue
High Court Declines to Block Biden Greenhouse Gas Policy
The U.S. Supreme Court building.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to block a Biden administration policy that directs federal agencies to assess the societal costs of greenhouse gases as part of their decision-making processes.

As is their custom, the justices did not explain their rationale for rejecting a request from Louisiana and nine other states to throw a roadblock in front of the policy.

The underlying litigation in the case began almost immediately after President Joe Biden took office in January 2021.

In one of his first acts as president, Biden signed an executive order reviving the Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases.


The working group has an Obama administration pedigree and was disbanded by former President Donald Trump soon after he took office.

Biden’s executive order empowered the working group to regularly issue estimates on the “social costs” of greenhouse gases and required federal agencies to include these estimates in each cost-benefit analysis for new regulations.

The states that challenged the new order dismissed it as a “power grab” and accused the Biden White House of trying to “manipulate America’s entire federal regulatory apparatus … so that the administration can impose its preferred policy outcomes on every sector of the American economy.”


A federal district court in Louisiana temporarily blocked the Biden administration from using the estimates as part of its regulatory decision-making process while litigation continues.

This led the administration to appeal to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which overturned the lower court ruling.

The states then petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case, asking the justices to reinstate the district court’s order barring federal agencies from using the interim estimates.

The states argued the executive order would force them to review every aspect of modern life and to bear the new hidden costs of doing so, without any authorization from Congress.

But in a brief filed on behalf of the administration, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued the executive order does not categorically require an agency to monetize costs and benefits in the first place.
In reality, she explained, the executive order “provides only that, if the agency does so, it generally must use the values provided by the Working Group rather than some other set of values.”


Prelogar also argued the states’ challenge is premature because there’s no way to assess the injury that might be caused to the states by future regulation.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue.

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Supreme Court

June 24, 2022
by Dan McCue
Justices Uphold HHS Language on Medicare Reimbursements

WASHINGTON — Though few likely noticed given the court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court also decided a... Read More

WASHINGTON — Though few likely noticed given the court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court also decided a highly technical case Friday regarding how the Department of Health and Human Services calculates a class of Medicare payments. The 5-4 ruling in Becerra v. Empire... Read More

Abortion Ruling a Galvanizing Moment in American Life

WASHINGTON — From the president of the United States to ordinary citizens as far away as Hawaii and Guam, nearly... Read More

WASHINGTON — From the president of the United States to ordinary citizens as far away as Hawaii and Guam, nearly everyone, it seemed by Friday afternoon, was talking about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn two landmark precedents enshrining abortion as a constitutional right. Speaking... Read More

Biden Calls Abortion Ruling 'a Sad Day' for Country

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden said Friday that “it’s a sad day for the court and the country” after... Read More

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden said Friday that “it’s a sad day for the court and the country” after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide. “Now with Roe gone, let’s be very clear, the health and... Read More

June 24, 2022
by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Overturns Roe, Holds Constitution Confers No Right to Abortion

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday overturned 50 years of legal precedent, ruling that the Constitution does not confer... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday overturned 50 years of legal precedent, ruling that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. The ruling, written by Justice Samuel Alito Jr., overturns both Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that established a woman’s right to... Read More

'Heightened Alert': Abortion Providers Brace for Ruling

In her first week on the job at a Philadelphia abortion clinic, Amanda Kifferly was taught how to search for... Read More

In her first week on the job at a Philadelphia abortion clinic, Amanda Kifferly was taught how to search for bombs. About a year later, protesters blocked the entrances and exits of The Women’s Centers, at one point pulling Kifferly into something resembling a mosh pit,... Read More

June 23, 2022
by Dan McCue
Justices Rule GOP Lawmakers Can Defend North Carolina Voter ID Law

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday held that Republican lawmakers in North Carolina can intervene to defend the state’s... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday held that Republican lawmakers in North Carolina can intervene to defend the state’s controversial voter-ID law, despite the fact the state’s Democratic attorney general is already defending it. The 8-1 ruling in Berger v. NC NAACP did not delve... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top