Democrats Focus on Health Care in Opposing Trump Court Pick

September 28, 2020by Michael Riley and Tony Czuczka. Bloomberg News (TNS)
Judge Amy Coney Barrett walks from the Oval Office to be introduced by President Donald Trump as his Supreme Court Associate Justice nominee in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, Sept. 26, 2020. (Yuri Gripas/Abaca Press/TNS)

Democrats zeroed in on the risk to Americans’ health care coverage in previewing the tactics they’ll use to oppose the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump’s new Supreme Court pick.

Regardless, Barrett’s confirmation seems assured given the Republican majority in the Senate. She would replace the most progressive member of the Supreme Court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died on Sept. 18. Barrett is a conservative favorite who, at just 48 years old, could be expected to remain on the court for decades.

Senate Republicans have signaled plans for a quick confirmation process kicking off on Oct. 12, and along with Trump are optimistic that a new justice can be seated before the Nov. 3 presidential election.

Democrats indicated a laser-like focus on the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, and portrayed the election as a way for their voters to help offset the court’s expected further shift to the right under Trump.

“The antidote to his — whatever he does is to vote, vote, vote,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday. “Vote for affordable care, vote for your preexisting condition, vote for your safety, and vote for your health.”

The Supreme Court will hear a case Nov. 10 that could ultimately be the means to strike down the ACA, long a Republican goal.

“It’s very clear from her writings, multiple writings, that she will be the vote that takes away health care for millions of Americans,” Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan said of Barrett on “Fox News Sunday.”

Later, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer joined a handful of his colleagues in declaring that he won’t meet with Barrett, saying at his New York office that the “whole process has been illegitimate.”

Barrett’s religious views, though, should play no role in the confirmation process, said Schumer. “It’s the issues.” Barrett, a mother of seven, would be the court’s sixth Roman Catholic if confirmed.

CLEAR OUTCOME

Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that the White House has already been in talks with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham to expedite the confirmation process.

The White House will begin delivering information on Barrett to Capitol Hill on Monday, he said.

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois said Democrats are powerless to stop the juggernaut.

“We can slow it down perhaps a matter of hours, maybe days at the most, but we can’t stop the outcome,” Durbin, the second ranked Democrat in the Senate, said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, like Schumer, said she won’t meet with Barrett before the mid-October hearings but “will take the opportunity to question her when she is under oath.”

“The issue is whether or not her closely held views on issues such as the Affordable Care Act, such as abortion rights, can be separated from her ability to be a fair and objective justice,” Hirono said on CNN’s “The Situation Room.”

During three years on the federal appeals court in Chicago, Barrett maintained a consistently conservative voting record across the range of issues that came before her, including gun rights and the government’s ability to protect workers and consumers from discrimination.

She could also create a majority on the court willing to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision legalizing abortion in the U.S. that has stood since 1973.

———

©2020 Bloomberg News

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

In The News

Health

Voting

Supreme Court

Justices Consider Hearing a Case on 'Most Offensive word'
Supreme Court
Justices Consider Hearing a Case on 'Most Offensive word'

WASHINGTON (AP) — Robert Collier says that during the seven years he worked as an operating room aide at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, white nurses called him and other Black employees "boy." Management ignored two large swastikas painted on a storage room wall. And for... Read More

Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Four)
Media
Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Four)
May 12, 2021
by Dan McCue

(This is the fourth and final part of a four-part series. The first three parts can be read here, here and here.) The First Amendment Prevails The Supreme Court’s decision in the Pentagon Papers case, officially, New York Times Co. v. United States, affirmed historical precedents... Read More

Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Two)
Media
Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Two)
May 11, 2021
by Dan McCue

(This is the second part of a four-part series. The first installment can be read here.) To Publish or Not to Publish Upon his return to Washington, Sheehan and an editor booked a room at the Jefferson Hotel, where they spent weeks reading and summarizing the... Read More

Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part One)
Media
Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part One)
May 10, 2021
by Dan McCue

The battle was joined on a Monday night. It was shortly after 7 p.m. on June 14, 1971, when a seething President Richard Nixon telephoned his attorney general, John Mitchell, and told him it was time to make the administration’s position clear to The New York... Read More

Law Requiring Nonprofit Disclosures Gets Chilly Reception in Supreme Court
Supreme Court
Law Requiring Nonprofit Disclosures Gets Chilly Reception in Supreme Court
April 27, 2021
by Tom Ramstack

WASHINGTON -- A California law that requires nonprofit organizations to disclose their donors met with skepticism among most of the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices during a hearing Monday. The law is opposed by coalitions of nonprofit organizations that say the disclosures could dry up their contributions... Read More

High Court Moves Away from Leniency for Minors Who Murder
Supreme Court
High Court Moves Away from Leniency for Minors Who Murder

WASHINGTON (AP) — After more than a decade in which the Supreme Court moved gradually toward more leniency for minors convicted of murder, the justices on Thursday moved the other way.The high court ruled 6-3 along liberal-conservative lines against a Mississippi inmate sentenced to life in... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top