Cities Urge Supreme Court to Uphold Anti-Discrimination Protections
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Conference of Mayors and a coalition of leaders from smaller municipalities are urging the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold protections against discrimination in the delivery of government services.
The court is currently scheduled to hear the case Fulton v. City of Philadelphia on Nov. 4.
During oral arguments, the justices will consider whether a foster care agency can override Philadelphia’s discrimination protections the city has imposed on government contractors and taxpayer-funded agencies, and turn away LGBTQ people or others seeking to be foster parents, based on the agency’s religious beliefs.
The case could have broad implications for the application of nondiscrimination laws and government policies around the country.
In a friend-of-the-court brief filed Monday, the mayors argue that if the foster care agency were to prevail, it would effectively void anti-discrimination statutes across the country and would impair the delivery of services to diverse communities.
“No one should be discriminated against because of who they love, who they are, or what they believe, especially by an organization that contracts with government agencies,” said Albany, N.Y., Mayor Kathy Sheehan, one of the signatories to the brief.
“I’m proud to join Philadelphia, New York City, and municipalities across the country to ensure cities are not forced to contract with organizations that discriminate against same-sex couples – or any other protected class of residents,” Sheehan said.
Marisa Franchini, corporation counsel for the city of Albany, said, “It is important that we protect all residents from discrimination based on sexual orientation, religion, gender, and all other protected characteristics when delivering government services, or when partnering with outside organizations to do so.
“That is why we must take a stand against this latest attack on not only the LBGTQ+ community, but all of our neighbors and community members.”
In The News
WASHINGTON — Should a federal law that protects National Guard members and reservists from being fired from their private sector jobs while they are deployed also apply to state government jobs? Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court hinted it might weigh in on the issue. The U.S. Supreme Court last Tuesday requested... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's plan to exclude millions of immigrants in the country illegally from the 2020 census count appeared to fizzle at the Supreme Court on Monday. California officials feared that Trump's policy, if put into effect in the last weeks of his presidency, could not only diminish the state's... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump, even while repeating his groundless claim that "we won the race," appeared Sunday to acknowledge dwindling chances of success in his legal battle to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election won by President-elect Joe Biden. "It's hard to get into the Supreme Court," he said... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus. The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the... Read More
WASHINGTON - Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., told the Federalist Society in a keynote address Thursday night the coronavirus pandemic has led to "previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty." "I am not diminishing the severity of the virus's threat to public health," Alito continued in a... Read More
WASHINGTON -- So much for the new conservative majority of the Supreme Court dismantling the Affordable Care Act. On Tuesday, during oral arguments for California v. Texas, one of this term's most anticipated cases, two members of that majority, suggested they're not inclined to strike down... Read More