Breyer Bids President Adieu as SCOTUS Prepares to Announce Final Rulings

June 29, 2022 by Dan McCue
Breyer Bids President Adieu as SCOTUS Prepares to Announce Final Rulings
Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer listens during a forum at the French Cultural Center in Boston, Mass., Feb. 13, 2017. (AP Photo/Steven Senne, File)

WASHINGTON — The letter, delivered to President Joe Biden Wednesday afternoon, was as modest and straightforward as the man who signed it.

“This past January, I wrote to inform you of my intent to retire from regular active service as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, upon the court rising for its summer recess,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote.

“Accordingly, my retirement from active services … will be effective on Thursday, June 30, 2022, at noon,” he said.

Breyer’s departure from the bench after 28 years and 525 opinions, will come just hours after the court releases the final two decisions of its current term, one on the environment and the other on immigration.

The justice leaves the high court with a well-entrenched reputation as a pragmatist who consistently voted with the other liberal justices on the court. And though he often stressed that the Supreme Court couldn’t cure every ill in American society, he was a firm believer in the law working for the average American.

Breyer, who was appointed to the court in 1994 by then-President Bill Clinton, hasn’t said what he’ll do in retirement, though he is expected to be the final guest this summer on the long-running “The Kalb Report,” hosted by Marvin Kalb, the former CBS and NBC newsman who is also the Edward R. Murrow Professor Emeritus at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government.

The swiftness of his departure has led some to suggest that the court is eager to put this controversial term behind it, especially after the protests and threats that have ensued since a draft of its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked to a reporter in May.

Breyer writes in his letter to Biden that he understands that U.S. Circuit Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was confirmed by a 53-47 vote in the Senate in April, “is prepared to take the prescribed oaths to begin her service as the 116th member of this court.” 

The Supreme Court later confirmed Jackson will be sworn in Thursday at noon, with Breyer, for whom she clerked and is succeeding, administering one oath, and Chief Justice John Roberts administering the other. 

Breyer concludes his note: “It has been my great honor to participate as a judge in the effort to maintain our Constitution and the rule of law.”

Jackson’s arrival on the court will not change its ideological balance. However, she will be the first Black woman to serve on the highest court in the nation.

The court will release its final two rulings of the current term on Thursday morning, beginning at 10 a.m.

As for the rulings to be released on Thursday, they are West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, a case argued Feb. 28, and Biden v. Texas, which was argued on April 26.

The former is a  challenge to the EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases, and it stems from former President Donald Trump’s decision to repeal the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan and replace it with his own Affordable Clean Energy Rule.

The Clean Power Plan established guidelines for states to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power plants; Trump’s rule largely did away with them.

However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the ACE Rule as arbitrary and capricious. 

The primary question before the Supreme Court is does the EPA have the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in virtually any industry, so long as it considers cost, non-air impacts and energy requirements?

But before they get there, the justices will have to decide whether the petitioners have standing to bring a case at all given the Biden administration hasn’t reinstated or offered its own replacement of the Clean Power Plan.

The question before the court in the latter case, Biden v. Texas, is whether the Department of Homeland Security must continue to enforce the Migrant Protection Protocols, a policy begun by former President Donald Trump that requires asylum seekers at the southern border to stay in Mexico while awaiting a hearing in U.S. immigration court.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • Joe Biden
  • Ketanji Brown Jackson
  • Stephen Breyer
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    May 19, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Allows Trump to Lift Deportation Protections for Venezuelans

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday said the Trump administration can proceed, for now, with its plan to toss... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday said the Trump administration can proceed, for now, with its plan to toss the Biden-era deportation protections of more than 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants. Nearly all of the justices approved the brief order in the ongoing case of Noem v.... Read More

    May 15, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Appear Divided Over Whether to Curb Nationwide Injunctions

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared to be divided along ideological lines Thursday as it considered whether to remove the... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared to be divided along ideological lines Thursday as it considered whether to remove the ability of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions. During a highly unusual oral argument this late in the term, the conservative justices seemed to believe... Read More

    May 15, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Says Context of Police Shooting Determines Whether It’s Justified

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appears to have made it easier for police officers to be sued for excessive use... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appears to have made it easier for police officers to be sued for excessive use of force with a ruling Thursday that requires courts to consider the "totality of circumstances." The ruling resulted from the 2016 fatal shooting of a Houston,... Read More

    Former Supreme Court Justice David Souter, a Republican Who Became a Liberal Darling, Has Died

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Retired Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, the ascetic bachelor and New Hampshire Republican who became a... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Retired Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, the ascetic bachelor and New Hampshire Republican who became a darling of liberals during his nearly 20 years on the bench, has died. He was 85. Souter died Thursday at his home in New Hampshire, the court said... Read More

    May 6, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Allows Transgender Ban in Military to Take Effect

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will allow a Trump administration ban on transgender individuals serving in... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will allow a Trump administration ban on transgender individuals serving in the military to take effect while legal proceedings on the matter continue. As is their custom when dealing with emergency applications, the justices gave no explanation... Read More

    May 6, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Justice Dept. Urges Supreme Court to Overturn Hawaii Gun Restrictions

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department and 25 state attorneys general are asking the Supreme Court to take a Hawaii case... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department and 25 state attorneys general are asking the Supreme Court to take a Hawaii case that could put further restrictions on the right to legally carry a concealed gun. Hawaii passed a law in 2023 saying legal gun owners could not... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top