Breyer Bids President Adieu as SCOTUS Prepares to Announce Final Rulings

June 29, 2022 by Dan McCue
Breyer Bids President Adieu as SCOTUS Prepares to Announce Final Rulings
Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer listens during a forum at the French Cultural Center in Boston, Mass., Feb. 13, 2017. (AP Photo/Steven Senne, File)

WASHINGTON — The letter, delivered to President Joe Biden Wednesday afternoon, was as modest and straightforward as the man who signed it.

“This past January, I wrote to inform you of my intent to retire from regular active service as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, upon the court rising for its summer recess,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote.

“Accordingly, my retirement from active services … will be effective on Thursday, June 30, 2022, at noon,” he said.

Breyer’s departure from the bench after 28 years and 525 opinions, will come just hours after the court releases the final two decisions of its current term, one on the environment and the other on immigration.

The justice leaves the high court with a well-entrenched reputation as a pragmatist who consistently voted with the other liberal justices on the court. And though he often stressed that the Supreme Court couldn’t cure every ill in American society, he was a firm believer in the law working for the average American.

Breyer, who was appointed to the court in 1994 by then-President Bill Clinton, hasn’t said what he’ll do in retirement, though he is expected to be the final guest this summer on the long-running “The Kalb Report,” hosted by Marvin Kalb, the former CBS and NBC newsman who is also the Edward R. Murrow Professor Emeritus at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government.

The swiftness of his departure has led some to suggest that the court is eager to put this controversial term behind it, especially after the protests and threats that have ensued since a draft of its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked to a reporter in May.

Breyer writes in his letter to Biden that he understands that U.S. Circuit Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was confirmed by a 53-47 vote in the Senate in April, “is prepared to take the prescribed oaths to begin her service as the 116th member of this court.” 

The Supreme Court later confirmed Jackson will be sworn in Thursday at noon, with Breyer, for whom she clerked and is succeeding, administering one oath, and Chief Justice John Roberts administering the other. 

Breyer concludes his note: “It has been my great honor to participate as a judge in the effort to maintain our Constitution and the rule of law.”

Jackson’s arrival on the court will not change its ideological balance. However, she will be the first Black woman to serve on the highest court in the nation.

The court will release its final two rulings of the current term on Thursday morning, beginning at 10 a.m.

As for the rulings to be released on Thursday, they are West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, a case argued Feb. 28, and Biden v. Texas, which was argued on April 26.

The former is a  challenge to the EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases, and it stems from former President Donald Trump’s decision to repeal the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan and replace it with his own Affordable Clean Energy Rule.

The Clean Power Plan established guidelines for states to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power plants; Trump’s rule largely did away with them.

However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the ACE Rule as arbitrary and capricious. 

The primary question before the Supreme Court is does the EPA have the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in virtually any industry, so long as it considers cost, non-air impacts and energy requirements?

But before they get there, the justices will have to decide whether the petitioners have standing to bring a case at all given the Biden administration hasn’t reinstated or offered its own replacement of the Clean Power Plan.

The question before the court in the latter case, Biden v. Texas, is whether the Department of Homeland Security must continue to enforce the Migrant Protection Protocols, a policy begun by former President Donald Trump that requires asylum seekers at the southern border to stay in Mexico while awaiting a hearing in U.S. immigration court.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • Joe Biden
  • Ketanji Brown Jackson
  • Stephen Breyer
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Takes Up Religious Rights Dispute Over LGBTQ Books in Maryland Schools

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments Tuesday over the religious rights of parents in Maryland to remove their... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments Tuesday over the religious rights of parents in Maryland to remove their children from elementary school classes using storybooks with LGBTQ characters. The case is the latest dispute involving religion to come before the conservative-led court. The justices have... Read More

    April 21, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Skeptical of Overriding Preventive Medical Tests in Obamacare

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is trying to decide whether to keep an Affordable Care Act provision that requires insurers... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is trying to decide whether to keep an Affordable Care Act provision that requires insurers to offer no-cost preventive care tests. The court heard arguments Monday on whether the procedure for deciding which tests can be included under the national insurance... Read More

    Supreme Court Says Trump Administration Must Work to Bring Back Mistakenly Deported Maryland Man

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday said the Trump administration must work to bring back a Maryland man who was... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday said the Trump administration must work to bring back a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to prison in El Salvador, rejecting the administration’s emergency appeal. The court acted in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran citizen who had... Read More

    Supreme Court Takes Up $8B Phone and Internet Subsidy

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a major legal fight over the $8 billion a year the federal... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a major legal fight over the $8 billion a year the federal government spends to subsidize phone and internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas, in a new test of federal regulatory power. The justices are reviewing an appellate ruling that... Read More

    March 24, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Rejects Children’s Lawsuit Seeking Injunction Against Climate Change

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive a lawsuit on behalf of children who said U.S.... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive a lawsuit on behalf of children who said U.S. energy policies that exacerbate climate change are damaging their futures. They said unrestrained climate change jeopardized their life, liberty, personal security and health. The 9th Circuit... Read More

    March 21, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Set to Hear Two Major Cases Next Week

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is set to hear two of the major cases in its current term next week;... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is set to hear two of the major cases in its current term next week; one that will take a closer look at racial gerrymandering in Louisiana, the other considering federal court jurisdiction over Clean Air Act cases. The first hearing,... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top