Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court Nomination Expected to Advance During Rare Sunday Senate Session
WASHINGTON — The Senate appears likely to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court as soon as next Monday.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R- Ky., had previously said that he anticipated beginning the process of considering the nomination of Barrett, currently a judge on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, during a rare Friday session of the Senate.
McConnell is expected to file a cloture motion on the Barrett nomination Friday, the day after the nomination is expected to be approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
That left the only real question of whether the cloture vote to limit debate would take place Sunday, which is the earliest possible time under Senate rules, or wait until Monday.
That cloture vote is now expected Sunday, setting up for the confirmation vote as early as Monday and likely no later than Tuesday even if all 30 hours of post-cloture debate were to be consumed.
McConnell has already told reporters in his home state of Kentucky that Barrett has the votes needed to be confirmed. Only a simple majority is required to invoke cloture, or cut off debate, on nominations.
In a sign that the Barrett nomination is not expected to take much longer than that to proceed, Georgia Republican Sen. David Perdue’s reelection campaign announced Monday that Perdue planned to attend an in-person Senate debate on Wednesday, Oct. 28. WTOC-TV had agreed to postpone the debate until that date, after McConnell scheduled Senate votes this week on COVID-19 aid-related measures.
“This week, Senator David Perdue was called back to Washington where the U.S. Senate will vote on vital legislation to provide COVID-19 relief for the people of Georgia,” Perdue campaign manager Ben Fry said in a statement. “Understanding the importance of these votes, which were not originally scheduled for this time, WTOC-TV has generously offered to reschedule Tuesday’s planned face-to-face Senatorial debate to the following week.”
The campaign of Perdue’s Democratic challenger, Jon Ossoff, called the debate postponement “convenient” for the GOP incumbent.
“It has always been David Perdue’s tactic to skate through this election without taking tough questions about his record on health care or other critical issues,” Ossoff communications director Miryam Lipper said in a statement.
(c)2020 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., All Rights Reserved
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON - Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., told the Federalist Society in a keynote address Thursday night the coronavirus pandemic has led to "previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty." "I am not diminishing the severity of the virus's threat to public health," Alito continued in a... Read More
WASHINGTON -- So much for the new conservative majority of the Supreme Court dismantling the Affordable Care Act. On Tuesday, during oral arguments for California v. Texas, one of this term's most anticipated cases, two members of that majority, suggested they're not inclined to strike down... Read More
WASHINGTON — This morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on a legal challenge seeking to overturn the Affordable Care Act. This third major challenge to the ACA heard by the Supreme Court, Texas v. California seeks to decide whether Congress, by eliminating the penalty... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett hears oral argument Tuesday in a case that threatens to wipe out the 2010 health care law, likely the term's most consequential case, under a political spotlight that rarely shines brighter on justices who would rather stay out of it.... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday set aside an appeals court ruling by a panel of conservative judges that held an injured police officer could sue and win damages from the leader of a Black Lives Matter protest rally. The case had raised alarms among civil libertarians, who said it... Read More
WASHINGTON — Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined her new colleagues on the Supreme Court Monday, participating in oral arguments for the first time. The cases on the docket Monday were no head-turners. The first, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club Inc., concerned public disclosure... Read More