Supreme Court Says It Will Hear Oral Arguments by Telephone

April 13, 2020 by Dan McCue
The U.S. Supreme Court building, June 2019. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear oral arguments by telephone conference next month, including cases involving so-called “faithless electors” and the Affordable Care Act’s contraception requirement.

Those cases, respectively, are Colorado Department of State v. Baca and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania.

Also on the unusual docket are the ongoing dispute over access to President Donald Trump’s tax returns (the consolidated cases Trump v. Vance; Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP; Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG) and unwanted robocalls and free speech (Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.).

The court will hear 10 cases over six days — May 4–6 and 11-13 — with the justices and lawyers participating over teleconference to abide by social-distancing policies.

“In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the justices and counsel will all participate remotely,” a statement from the court said.

News media will have access to a live audio feed of the arguments, though the details have not been announced.

Monday’s announcement that the justices will use teleconferences for oral arguments is considered a major step for a court that is traditionally slow to adopt new technologies.

However, it comes after the coronavirus outbreak forced the court to postpone oral arguments in March and April.

Anthony Marcum, a resident fellow at R Street, a non-profit public policy research organization, said, “In light of the current public health crisis, the Supreme Court is taking the right step to hear oral arguments remotely. This sends a powerful message that the Court remains open for business and will carry on adjudicating the nation’s most pressing legal disputes.”

“Even better, it has been reported that live audio of these hearings will be available to the public. This is unprecedented and a tremendous step in improving the transparency of the Supreme Court. After this current health crisis is over, there is little reason why the Court should not continue this practice,” Marcum added.

The cases to be heard in May will be assigned specific argument dates once the court clerk’s office has confirmed the availability of counsel:

The entire list of cases to be heard in May is as follows:

18-9526, McGirt v. Oklahoma

19-46, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.

19-177, Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.

19-267, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, and 19-348, St. James School v. Biel

19-431, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, and 19-454, Trump v. Pennsylvania

19-465, Chiafalo v. Washington

19-518, Colorado Department of State v. Baca

19-631, Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc.

19-635, Trump v. Vance

19-715, Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, and 19-760, Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG

As has been true the past several weeks, the Supreme Court building remains open for official business, but most court personnel are teleworking. The building remains closed to the public until further notice.

Supreme Court

Senate Set to Confirm Barrett to Supreme Court Next Monday
Supreme Court
Senate Set to Confirm Barrett to Supreme Court Next Monday
October 20, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON — The Senate will put in a long work session this weekend in a bid to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court by next Monday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday. McConnell has repeatedly said Barrett has clearly demonstrated she's the... Read More

Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court Nomination Expected to Advance During Rare Sunday Senate Session
Supreme Court
Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court Nomination Expected to Advance During Rare Sunday Senate Session

WASHINGTON -- The Senate appears likely to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court as soon as next Monday. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R- Ky., had previously said that he anticipated beginning the process of considering the nomination of Barrett, currently a judge on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, during a rare... Read More

Supreme Court to Take Up 'Remain in Mexico' and Border Wall Cases
Supreme Court
Supreme Court to Take Up 'Remain in Mexico' and Border Wall Cases
October 19, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take up two cases arising from President Donald Trump's efforts to slow both legal and illegal immigration from Mexico. Monday's announcement followed an order late Friday in which the high court said it will fast-track the appeal in... Read More

Senate Sets Date for Vote on Confirmation of Barrett to Supreme Court
Supreme Court
Senate Sets Date for Vote on Confirmation of Barrett to Supreme Court
October 15, 2020
by Tom Ramstack

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Senate is scheduled to vote October 22 on whether to confirm Amy Coney Barrett as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court. The Senate Judiciary Committee set the date Thursday on the fourth day of contentious confirmation hearings in which Republicans and... Read More

Democrats Hammer on Health Care in Third Day of Supreme Court Nominee Barrett’s Hearings
In The News
Democrats Hammer on Health Care in Third Day of Supreme Court Nominee Barrett’s Hearings

WASHINGTON — Democrats zeroed in on key issues surrounding health care Wednesday on the third day of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearings, as Republicans argued members of the other party have overblown their criticisms of a qualified judge. Barrett, whom President Donald Trump... Read More

Notre Dame Faculty Members Urge Barrett to Pause Confirmation Process
Supreme Court
Notre Dame Faculty Members Urge Barrett to Pause Confirmation Process

Dozens of faculty members at the University of Notre Dame inked their names to an open letter urging Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a former law professor at the school, to halt her Supreme Court confirmation process until after Election Day. The letter carried 88 signatories from... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top