Supreme Court Says It Will Hear Oral Arguments by Telephone
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear oral arguments by telephone conference next month, including cases involving so-called “faithless electors” and the Affordable Care Act’s contraception requirement.
Those cases, respectively, are Colorado Department of State v. Baca and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania.
Also on the unusual docket are the ongoing dispute over access to President Donald Trump’s tax returns (the consolidated cases Trump v. Vance; Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP; Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG) and unwanted robocalls and free speech (Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.).
The court will hear 10 cases over six days — May 4–6 and 11-13 — with the justices and lawyers participating over teleconference to abide by social-distancing policies.
“In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the justices and counsel will all participate remotely,” a statement from the court said.
News media will have access to a live audio feed of the arguments, though the details have not been announced.
Monday’s announcement that the justices will use teleconferences for oral arguments is considered a major step for a court that is traditionally slow to adopt new technologies.
However, it comes after the coronavirus outbreak forced the court to postpone oral arguments in March and April.
Anthony Marcum, a resident fellow at R Street, a non-profit public policy research organization, said, “In light of the current public health crisis, the Supreme Court is taking the right step to hear oral arguments remotely. This sends a powerful message that the Court remains open for business and will carry on adjudicating the nation’s most pressing legal disputes.”
“Even better, it has been reported that live audio of these hearings will be available to the public. This is unprecedented and a tremendous step in improving the transparency of the Supreme Court. After this current health crisis is over, there is little reason why the Court should not continue this practice,” Marcum added.
The cases to be heard in May will be assigned specific argument dates once the court clerk’s office has confirmed the availability of counsel:
The entire list of cases to be heard in May is as follows:
18-9526, McGirt v. Oklahoma
19-46, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.
19-177, Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
19-267, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, and 19-348, St. James School v. Biel
19-431, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, and 19-454, Trump v. Pennsylvania
19-465, Chiafalo v. Washington
19-518, Colorado Department of State v. Baca
19-631, Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc.
19-635, Trump v. Vance
19-715, Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, and 19-760, Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG
As has been true the past several weeks, the Supreme Court building remains open for official business, but most court personnel are teleworking. The building remains closed to the public until further notice.
In The News
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that neither Article II of the Constitution nor the Supremacy Clause categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president. The 7-2 ruling by the high court in... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday banned teachers who work at church-run schools from filing discrimination lawsuits against their employers, ruling that the Constitution’s protection for religious liberty exempts church schools from state and federal anti-discrimination laws. The justices, by a 7-2 vote, shielded two... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Trump administration regulation that lets employers with religious objections limit women’s access to free birth control under the Affordable Care Act. The 7-2 decision could have a profound, immediate effect on as many as 126,000 women who... Read More
WASHINGTON - Chief Justice John Roberts spent a night in the hospital last month after he fell and injured his forehead while walking for exercise near his home, a Supreme Court spokeswoman said Tuesday night. According to court spokeswoman Kathleen Arberg, Roberts' injuries required sutures and... Read More
WASHINGTON— The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a 1991 law that bars robocalls to cellphones. The case, argued by telephone in May because of the coronavirus pandemic, stems from a 2015 decision by Congress to carve out an exception to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The... Read More
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that so-called faithless electors can be penalized if they renege on their pledge to vote for their state voters' choice for president. Writing for a nearly unanimous court, Justice Elena Kagan began with a summation of the electoral... Read More