Supreme Court Clears Way for the Blind to Sue Retailers Over Inaccessible Websites
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court this week turned down appeal of a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, effectively clearing the way for blind and vision-impaired individuals to sue retailers if their websites are not accessible.
The 9th Circuit had ruled in a case involving Domino’s Pizza that the Americans With Disabilities Act not only mandates that restaurants and stores be accessible to people with disabilities, but that these businesses websites and apps also must be clear of barriers to use.
Guillermo Robles, who is blind, sued Domino’s three years ago after he attempted to order a pizza online and found the merchant’s website lacked software that would have allowed him to complete the order.
Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act states that “no individual may be discriminated against on the basis of disability with regards to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation.”
It goes on to define public accommodations to include most places of lodging (such as inns and hotels), recreation, transportation, education, and dining, as well as stores, care providers, and places of public displays.
Robles claimed the lack of software to make Domino’s website accessible to him and other blind people violated Title VII.
Attorney for Domino’s agreed the provision applied to its carry out pizza stores, but not to the company’s website.
But in its ruling last year, the 9th Circuit said “the ADA mandates that places of public accommodation, like Domino’s, provide auxiliary aids and services to make visual materials available to individuals who are blind.”
Domino’s petitioned the Supreme Court, asking it to review the decision, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups joined the appeal, saying they feared a “tsunami of litigation” if the 9th Circuit’s ruling were allowed to stand.
Several organizations and businesses also argued that the 9th Circuit ruling unlawfully imposed a nationwide website accessibility mandate” — something they contended only Congress could do.
As is often their custom, the justices did not explain why they did not take up the case.
As a result of the Supreme Court failing to get involved, the 9th Circuit sent the case back to the trial judge in Los Angeles to decide whether Robles suffered discrimination.
“Although Domino’s is disappointed that the Supreme Court will not review this case, we look forward to presenting our case at the trial court,” Domino’s said in a statement posted on its website. “We also remain steadfast in our belief in the need for federal standards for everyone to follow in making their websites and mobile apps accessible.”
In The News
WASHINGTON — Every weekday morning, mental health clinician Carleigh Sailon turns on her police radio in downtown Denver and finds out who she can help next. She, along with a paramedic, jump in a repurposed city van, stripped of its blue lights and official insignia, and... Read More
WASHINGTON - Social media security officials acknowledged to Congress Thursday that they face ongoing threats by foreign governments to influence American society despite their best preventive efforts. They testified to the House Intelligence Committee as it seeks assurances there will be no repeat of the 2016... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department will consider taking legal action against governors who continue to impose stringent rules for dealing with the coronavirus that infringe on constitutional rights even after the crisis subsides in their states, Attorney General William Barr said. Blunt means to deal with... Read More
A total of 105,195 voters turned out for last weekend's Nevada Democratic caucuses surpassing the 84,000 voters who participated in 2016, the Nevada State Democratic Party said. Despite the big crowd, the numbers fell short of the record 118,000 people who participated in the 2008 caucuses.... Read More
WASHINGTON – A new report released by D.C.-based think tank Bipartisan Policy Center hopes to strengthen transparency at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by suggesting options for growing a culture of data and evidence. On the cusp of the EPA’s 50th anniversary, BPC has published the... Read More
CEDARVILLE, Mich. — On a frigid morning in late fall, resort owner Mark Engle studied the mangled planks and dock posts scattered along an ice-glazed channel that feeds into Lake Huron. Les Cheneaux Landing Resort, tucked behind an archipelago of 36 islands off Michigan’s Upper Peninsula,... Read More