Loading...

Facebook Official Defends Deepfake Policy Before House Panel

January 9, 2020 by Kate Michael
Facebook Official Defends Deepfake Policy Before House Panel

WASHINGTON – A Facebook official told a House panel on Wednesday that the social media giant is “working proactively to remove harmful content,” but critics maintained the company has a “trust problem” that warrants greater government scrutiny.

The showdown between advocates of freedom of speech and greater government regulation took place Wednesday morning during a hearing of the House Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce. 

Entitled “Americans at Risk: Manipulation and Deception in the Digital Age,” the hearing’s main draw was the testimony of Monika Bickert, Facebook’s vice president of global policy and management. 

Facebook recently unveiled its latest new policy prohibiting misleading and manipulated media, otherwise known as deepfakes. 

Under this policy, the company has vowed to “remove videos that have been edited or synthesized using artificial intelligence or deep learning techniques in ways that are not apparent to an average person and that would mislead an average person to believe that the subject of the video said words that they did not say,” Bickert said. 

Yet questions on the policy, its extent, and its enforcement remain.

“Facebook has a trust problem,” asserted Justin Hurwitz, an associate professor of law at the University of Nebraska, at the hearing,

Also testifying Wednesday were Joan Donovan, research director at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media Politics and Public Policy, and Tristan Harris, executive director of the Center for Humane Technology. 

Lawmakers expressed concern not only over digital misinformation, but about general deception and abuse. Subcommittee Chair Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., suggested that over the last decade, the government’s “laissez-faire” approach to the topic of online data and digital manipulation has been “wholly inadequate,” pointing to a recent so-called  ‘cheapfake’ video of Nancy Pelosi that went viral on Facebook. 

A cheapfake is an altered audio or video, whereas a deepfake is entirely fabricated. Both deep- and cheapfakes can be made with simple, readily available  technology, and both are part of the “emerging economy of misinformation,” according to Donovan, who warned of an impending “crisis of counterfeits.”

“If you can make it a trend, you can make it true,” said Harris, and “by not acting, we are subsidizing societal self-destruction.”

Facebook is “working proactively to remove harmful content,” argued Bickert, explaining how it uses both its community standards practices and a relationship with third-party fact-checkers to accomplish this. 

Manipulated media violates Facebook’s Community Standards policies and is eligible to be both fact-checked and removed. An individual poster can protest this determination, and has the opportunity to amend the content, she explained, 

“Speech, even when inaccurate, is protected,” said Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore. 

However, he appeared open to revision of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which has been criticized for acting as a legal liability shield for third-party content on social networking sites like Facebook.

Modifying Section 230 may address concerns regarding nefarious targeting of race and/or regional location to disseminate political misinformation, particularly worrisome due to the upcoming campaign season.  

Bickert pointed to training and tools provided by Facebook to help those most at risk realize when they are being targeted, as well as Facebook’s efforts to remove those networks and expose them publicly when they are identified.  

But the question of whether it is an individual’s responsibility to educate themselves or the government’s responsibility to protect people from false information remains unresolved.

Hurwtiz cautioned that efforts to regulate “dark patterns” and corrupt persuasive design would likely have repercussions. He suggested that “the worst of this” already falls within the existing authority of the FTC. “We already have an agency that has power over this.  Let’s see what it is capable of.”  

Bickert said she welcomed the opportunity for Facebook to collaborate to develop a consistent industry approach and standards to cooperate in self-regulating online content. 

She called attention to publicly available bi-annual reports showcasing media manipulation abuses on Facebook by amount and type. And, she said, Facebook’s numbers have been trending in a favorable direction.

In The News

Health

Voting

Social Media

June 1, 2022
by Madeline Hughes
Sheryl Sandberg Steps Down as Facebook Exec

WASHINGTON — Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandberg announced she is leaving the company this fall after 14 years. “Fourteen years later,... Read More

WASHINGTON — Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandberg announced she is leaving the company this fall after 14 years. “Fourteen years later, it is time for me to write the next chapter of my life,” she wrote in a Facebook post. “I am not entirely sure what the... Read More

June 1, 2022
by Alexa Hornbeck
HHS to Fund Center Focused on Social Media Use and Youth Mental Health

WASHINGTON — The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, will... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, will soon direct millions in funds towards examining the impact of social media use on the mental health of teens and children. “Social media can be associated... Read More

May 31, 2022
by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Blocks Texas Social Media Censorship Law

WASHINGTON — Social media companies scored a huge win late Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court voted 5-4 to temporarily... Read More

WASHINGTON — Social media companies scored a huge win late Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court voted 5-4 to temporarily block a Texas law that would have barred them from taking action on hate speech and disinformation. NetChoice v. Paxton is considered a major test of... Read More

May 27, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
DC Attorney General Sues Meta Chief Executive for Cambridge Analytica Data Breach

WASHINGTON — Washington, D.C.'s attorney general is suing Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg over his alleged backing of the Cambridge... Read More

WASHINGTON — Washington, D.C.'s attorney general is suing Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg over his alleged backing of the Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal suspected of influencing the 2016 presidential election. Cambridge Analytica, a former British political consulting firm, used data it took from Facebook without its... Read More

May 26, 2022
by Madeline Hughes
Twitter Fined $150M for Using Emails, Phone Numbers for Targeted Advertising

WASHINGTON — Twitter has agreed to pay a $150 million fine in a settlement reached with the Department of Justice... Read More

WASHINGTON — Twitter has agreed to pay a $150 million fine in a settlement reached with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission for improperly using users’ email addresses and phone numbers for targeted advertising, according to a complaint filed by the Department of... Read More

May 24, 2022
by Madeline Hughes
Appeals Court Hands Gov. DeSantis a Loss

ATLANTA, Ga. —  A Florida law intended to punish social media companies from allegedly barring conservative politicians from their platforms... Read More

ATLANTA, Ga. —  A Florida law intended to punish social media companies from allegedly barring conservative politicians from their platforms is unconstitutional, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday. “Put simply, with minor exceptions, the government can’t tell a private person or entity what... Read More

News From The Well