Facebook Official Defends Deepfake Policy Before House Panel

January 9, 2020 by Kate Michael
Paul Scharre views in his offices in Washington, DC January 25, 2019 a manipulated video by BuzzFeed with filmmaker Jordan Peele (R on screen) using readily available software and applications to change what is said by former president Barack Obama, illustrating how deepfake technology can deceive viewers. (Rober Lever/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)

WASHINGTON – A Facebook official told a House panel on Wednesday that the social media giant is “working proactively to remove harmful content,” but critics maintained the company has a “trust problem” that warrants greater government scrutiny.

The showdown between advocates of freedom of speech and greater government regulation took place Wednesday morning during a hearing of the House Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce. 

Entitled “Americans at Risk: Manipulation and Deception in the Digital Age,” the hearing’s main draw was the testimony of Monika Bickert, Facebook’s vice president of global policy and management. 

Facebook recently unveiled its latest new policy prohibiting misleading and manipulated media, otherwise known as deepfakes. 

Under this policy, the company has vowed to “remove videos that have been edited or synthesized using artificial intelligence or deep learning techniques in ways that are not apparent to an average person and that would mislead an average person to believe that the subject of the video said words that they did not say,” Bickert said. 

Yet questions on the policy, its extent, and its enforcement remain.

“Facebook has a trust problem,” asserted Justin Hurwitz, an associate professor of law at the University of Nebraska, at the hearing,

Also testifying Wednesday were Joan Donovan, research director at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media Politics and Public Policy, and Tristan Harris, executive director of the Center for Humane Technology. 

Lawmakers expressed concern not only over digital misinformation, but about general deception and abuse. Subcommittee Chair Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., suggested that over the last decade, the government’s “laissez-faire” approach to the topic of online data and digital manipulation has been “wholly inadequate,” pointing to a recent so-called  ‘cheapfake’ video of Nancy Pelosi that went viral on Facebook. 

A cheapfake is an altered audio or video, whereas a deepfake is entirely fabricated. Both deep- and cheapfakes can be made with simple, readily available  technology, and both are part of the “emerging economy of misinformation,” according to Donovan, who warned of an impending “crisis of counterfeits.”

“If you can make it a trend, you can make it true,” said Harris, and “by not acting, we are subsidizing societal self-destruction.”

Facebook is “working proactively to remove harmful content,” argued Bickert, explaining how it uses both its community standards practices and a relationship with third-party fact-checkers to accomplish this. 

Manipulated media violates Facebook’s Community Standards policies and is eligible to be both fact-checked and removed. An individual poster can protest this determination, and has the opportunity to amend the content, she explained, 

“Speech, even when inaccurate, is protected,” said Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore. 

However, he appeared open to revision of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which has been criticized for acting as a legal liability shield for third-party content on social networking sites like Facebook.

Modifying Section 230 may address concerns regarding nefarious targeting of race and/or regional location to disseminate political misinformation, particularly worrisome due to the upcoming campaign season.  

Bickert pointed to training and tools provided by Facebook to help those most at risk realize when they are being targeted, as well as Facebook’s efforts to remove those networks and expose them publicly when they are identified.  

But the question of whether it is an individual’s responsibility to educate themselves or the government’s responsibility to protect people from false information remains unresolved.

Hurwtiz cautioned that efforts to regulate “dark patterns” and corrupt persuasive design would likely have repercussions. He suggested that “the worst of this” already falls within the existing authority of the FTC. “We already have an agency that has power over this.  Let’s see what it is capable of.”  

Bickert said she welcomed the opportunity for Facebook to collaborate to develop a consistent industry approach and standards to cooperate in self-regulating online content. 

She called attention to publicly available bi-annual reports showcasing media manipulation abuses on Facebook by amount and type. And, she said, Facebook’s numbers have been trending in a favorable direction.

In The News

Health

Voting

Social Media

Journalists Demanding More Action Against Online Harassment
Media
Journalists Demanding More Action Against Online Harassment

NEW YORK (AP) — The Associated Press' recent firing of a young reporter for what she said on Twitter has somewhat unexpectedly turned company and industry attention to the flip side of social media engagement — the online abuse that many journalists face routinely. During internal... Read More

Trump Suspended From Facebook, Instagram for Two Years
Social Media
Trump Suspended From Facebook, Instagram for Two Years
June 4, 2021
by Dan McCue

Donald Trump’s accounts on two of the world’s biggest social media platforms will be suspended for at least two years and will only be reinstated “if” conditions permit. The announcement from Facebook, which also applies to Instagram, comes just weeks after the independent Facebook Oversight Board... Read More

Reports: Facebook to End Rule Exemptions for Politicians
Social Media
Reports: Facebook to End Rule Exemptions for Politicians

Facebook plans to end a contentious policy championed by CEO Mark Zuckerberg that exempted politicians from certain moderation rules on its site, according to several news reports. The company's rationale for that policy held that the speech of political leaders is inherently newsworthy and in the... Read More

Facebook Releases Renewable Energy Impact Study
Social Media
Facebook Releases Renewable Energy Impact Study
May 26, 2021
by Reece Nations

MENLO PARK, Calif. — In an economic analysis of the company’s solar and wind projects that support its data centers across the nation, Facebook iterated its adherence to broader sustainability initiatives.  As of last year, Facebook’s fleet of energy-intensive data centers are powered entirely by renewable... Read More

Oversight Board Upholds Facebook Ban on Trump, With Caveat
Social Media
Oversight Board Upholds Facebook Ban on Trump, With Caveat
May 5, 2021
by Dan McCue

Facebook’s Oversight Board has upheld the social media platform’s suspension of former President Donald Trump’s Facebook account, but in doing so, it said the company failed to impose the penalty properly. “It is not permissible for Facebook to keep a user off the platform for an... Read More

Senators Charge Addiction Drives Social Media Platforms’ Business Models
Social Media
Senators Charge Addiction Drives Social Media Platforms’ Business Models
April 28, 2021
by Victoria Turner

WASHINGTON - Even after the call-to-arms of the Kenosha Guard militia group had been flagged on Facebook 450 times, it was not taken down because it did not “meet the standards” for removal, said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., at a Senate hearing on Tuesday. This led... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top