Trump Administration Imposes New Restrictions on Fetal Tissue Research
The Trump administration announced Wednesday that it will sharply reduce the amount of federal money supporting medical research that relies on tissue from aborted fetuses, handing a significant victory to anti-abortion groups who had lobbied for such a decision for years.
In a statement posted to its website Wednesday afternoon, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it is immediately ending a $2 million-a-year program with the University of California, San Francisco, for research using fetal tissue from elective abortions.
The department went on to say that based on a review that began last fall, it is also ending about 200 research projects conducted by federal scientists at the National Institutes of Health that involve fetal tissue from elective abortions.
In announcing the changes, HHS explained that “promoting the dignity of human life from conception to natural death is one of the very top priorities of President Trump’s administration.”
In addition to unveiling the new restrictions, the department said it is continuing to conduct a comprehensive review of all research involving fetal tissue “to ensure consistency with statutes and regulations governing such research, and to ensure the adequacy of procedures and oversight of this research in light of the serious regulatory, moral, and ethical considerations involved.”
It also said it will carry out ethics reviews on government-funded research at universities and other scientific centers that propose to use fetal tissue.
Federal funding of such research became a hot-button issue four years ago after a group opposed to a woman’s right to make her own health decisions, released videos purportedly showing Planned Parenthood profiting from sale of the tissues.
Planned Parenthood sued, contending the videos were edited to be intentionally misleading, and a Texas grand jury subsequently cleared the agency of any wrongdoing.
On Wednesday, the group behind the videos, the Center for Medical Progress, released a statement saying “President Trump is showing transformative leadership by directing his pro-life administration to end the unconscionable taxpayer funding of fetal experimentation.
“Americans across the country are experiencing a revolution of consciousness about the human atrocity of industrial-scale, taxpayer-funded abortion and infanticide. Now is the time for the U.S. Department of Justice and regulatory authorities to hold entities like Planned Parenthood who traffic in aborted baby body parts accountable under the law,” the group said.
Meanwhile Jeanne Mancini, president of March for Life, another anti-abortion group, said “most Americans do not want their tax dollars creating a marketplace for aborted baby body parts which are then implanted into mice and used for experimentation.
“This type of research involves the gross violation of basic human rights and certainly the government has no business funding it,” Mancini said.
But in an interview with The New York Times, Lawrence Gusting, a professor of public health law at Georgetown University, said the administration’s actions on Wednesday would “devastate” critical medical research.
“It will affect everything from cures for cancer and H.I.V. through to Parkinson’s and dementia,” Gusting told the Times. “The ban on fetal tissue research is akin to a ban on hope for millions of Americans suffering from life threatening and debilitating diseases.
“It will also severely impact the National Institutes of Health, universities, and other researchers, who will lose key funding for their laboratories and their vital work,” he said.
In The News
WASHINGTON — Data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on COVID-19's delta variant found that vaccine efficacy... Read More
WASHINGTON — Data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on COVID-19's delta variant found that vaccine efficacy was higher among recipients of the Moderna vaccination at 95%, higher than both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Johnson & Johnson vaccines. The CDC collected data in... Read More
This article is by Warren Cornwall and was originally published by Anthropocene magazine. When tallying up the myriad things sending planet-warming gases into... Read More
This article is by Warren Cornwall and was originally published by Anthropocene magazine. When tallying up the myriad things sending planet-warming gases into the atmosphere, don’t overlook bugs. While humans drive up the overall levels of greenhouse gases by burning fossil fuels, a variety of natural forces shape how... Read More
A scientific report first published in the peer-reviewed journal Cell sheds new light on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic... Read More
A scientific report first published in the peer-reviewed journal Cell sheds new light on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and concludes that evidence of a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology is unlikely. Researchers studying the geographic locations of the first wave of COVID-19... Read More
A recent study from researchers at the University of Washington shows that COVID-19 vaccines are well-tolerated among individuals who are... Read More
A recent study from researchers at the University of Washington shows that COVID-19 vaccines are well-tolerated among individuals who are pregnant, lactating, or planning pregnancy. “I think pregnant individuals are hardwired to try to protect their baby, and when there are vaccines and other substances we... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Administrator Bill Nelson handed over a check for 10 cents to Lunar... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Administrator Bill Nelson handed over a check for 10 cents to Lunar Outpost CEO Justin Cyrus at yesterday’s Space Foundation 36th Space Symposium. The check was 10% of the Colorado-based startup’s $1 bid that landed them the contract... Read More
A new study from a team of international researchers finds that our metabolism does not slow down over the span... Read More
A new study from a team of international researchers finds that our metabolism does not slow down over the span of a lifetime as traditionally believed, but rather stalls from age 20 to 60. “We can see that infants have accelerated metabolism, and that not until... Read More