Deep Local Roots Endure Even In Nationalized Partisan Political Era
WASHINGTON – A new study suggests the deeper a member of Congress’s local roots in their congressional district, the less likely they are to attract a primary challenger, and if they do, the more likely they are to win by a significant margin.
The study, published in the latest edition of American Politics Research, a peer-reviewed academic journal, found that members with strong local ties are less than half as likely to attract a primary challenger than their less-rooted counterparts.
Further, author Charles Hunt observed, when these members are challenged in a primary, they tend to win by margins almost 6 percentage points higher than comparable members with more tenuous ties to the communities they represent.
“These results should compel scholars of congressional elections to reconsider what factors shape electoral dynamics in the district in the primary election stages, especially factors that allow MCs to differentiate themselves from one another,” Hunt wrote.
“Local roots offer an important distinguishing characteristic for incumbent members of Congress in primary contests where ideological and partisan differences between the candidates are small. They also establish deep and lasting political, economic, and social networks that help them deter potential rivals for their party’s nomination in the district,” he added.
The findings suggest that the depth of a member’s local roots among their constituents should be considered alongside other, more traditional factors, in models used to predict electoral outcomes in the district.
“Not only do local roots have substantial impacts at the primary election stage, but the magnitude and statistical confidence of these impacts rival or in many cases overtake those of other important determinants of electoral outcomes like partisanship, ideology, tenure length, and election laws,” Hunt wrote.
“Importantly,” he added, “local roots vary extensively between incumbent MCs, and help explain different electoral outcomes that occur between otherwise similar incumbent-constituency pairings.”
City District/Country District
The report acknowledged that one factor that could “complicate the potency” of these benefits is the type of geographic area that makes up a given congressional district.
But Hunt said after carefully considering the differences between urban, suburban and rural districts, he found that the depth of a candidate’s local roots had a significant impact on the outcome of their race regardless of the district’s urban/rural status, geographic mobility or population density.
He noted however that “future work might dig deeper into these differences” to assess the type of “Subconstituencies” within the district that might be more receptive than others to view local roots as an important credential for the candidate they choose to support.
The Nationalization of Partisan Politics
While a number of influential studies have offered compelling evidence that electoral politics are increasingly structured around national issues, partisan identities and polarized ideologies, Hunt found something reassuring in his research – that while the influence of local roots may have declined somewhat over recent decades, a nonpartisan and non-ideological connection with constituents still matters.
In fact, he wrote, this “speaks volumes about its resilience in shaping the member-constituent relationship – and about the gaps that remain in explaining an electoral performance that nationalized partisanship does not yet satisfy.”
He muses, “All politics is clearly no longer local, as former House Speaker Tip O’Neill used to say. But nor is it all national.”
Sacrificing Once Constituency for Another
Hunt conceded that the nationalization of politics undoubtedly makes it increasingly difficult for members seeking re-election to appeal to both ideologically extreme primary electorates and partisan-polarized general elections.
“As a result, members often must sacrifice support from one subconstituency to please another,” he wrote, citing decades of earlier research.
“Local roots pose no such risk, and as a result may also represent a potential avenue for scholars and other political practitioners searching for ways to de-polarize electorates on smaller scales,” Hunt continued.
“However highly-engaged, deeply partisan, and ideologically extreme primary voters may be, they live in and care about the district as a place, and as their home; so, too, do many general election voters who may not share a member’s ideological or even partisan identity.
“By its very definition, the local identity of the district is the one constituents of all stripes have in common. … Shared, place-based roots therefore represent a rare commodity for reelection-seeking MCs in an age of partisan nationalization: a local connection with their district that has widespread appeal and a significant, positive impact on an MC’s electoral fate regardless of party or ideology,” Hunt concluded.
In The News
BETHESDA, Md. - The National Institutes of Health released a call for research on how COVID-19 may be indirectly and directly impacting those with HIV. According to the written statement the, “COVID-19 pandemic is affecting people with or at risk for HIV by interfering with HIV... Read More
This article was originally published by Anthropocene magazine. Carbon footprint labels cause people to choose meat products with 25% lower climate impact, according to a study of hypothetical purchasing decisions conducted in Sweden. The study lends support to an emerging strategy of carbon labeling in grocery... Read More
This week, Change Research, a polling research firm, and New Georgia Project, a voting advocacy group, hosted a joint webinar discussion on how polling data was used to motivate and engage the American voting public during the 2020 election cycle. Panelists shared their thoughts on strategies... Read More
Populations of the American bald eagle — the bold national symbol of the United States — have quadrupled since 2009, according to a new report by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and its partners. Bald eagles once teetered on the brink of extinction, reaching an all-time low of 417 known... Read More
WASHINGTON - The National Weather Service has significantly upgraded its longstanding forecast model to better predict extreme weather events such as hurricanes, blizzards and downpours, as well as day-to-day weather across the U.S. While it is easy to get bogged down in the jargon of the... Read More
WASHINGTON – Reps. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., and Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., are reviving their quest to establish a National Center for Alternatives to Animals in Research and Testing and ultimately curtailing the use of animals in federally funded research. Their bill, the Humane Research and Testing Act, would establish... Read More