Renewable Energy Surpasses Coal As Source of US Energy, Researchers Say

May 16, 2019 by Dan McCue

For the first time in history, renewable energy surpassed coal earlier this month as a source of electricity generation in the United States, the Brookings Institution reported Wednesday.

The paper underlying the report attributes this remarkable development to U.S. municipalities and businesses striving to fill the void created by President Donald Trump announcing the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord.

Authors Shanta Devarajan and Tito Cordella, senior director and adviser, respectively of development economics at The World Bank said an unanticipated consequence of the U.S. “leaving Paris” was how private firms and local governments would react.

“Major oil companies, including ExxonMobil, continue to invest in low-carbon technologies and some state governments have imposed stricter local environmental standards to countervail the weaker federal ones,” the authors write in a Brookings Institution blog on their findings.

As an example, they point to the efforts of then-California Governor Jerry Brown, who in September 2018 signed an executive order committing the state to be carbon-neutral by 2045.

“As Nathan Hultman and Paul Bodnar put it in another Brookings blog, ‘Trump tried to kill the Paris agreement, but the effect has been the opposite,'” the authors write.

While the unexpected developments may be due to the public-spirited behavior of firms and state governments, the authors suggest that firms’ investments in clean technologies and states’ adoption of stricter emission standards could also be the result of firms’ profit-maximizing behavior accompanied by successful lobbying efforts in the face of weaker environmental rules.

“The decision to relax emission standards may increase firms’ incentives to adopt clean technologies. The reason is simple: The increased output that these technologies permit may raise profits by more than what the dirty technologies allow,” they write.

Despite the headline-grabbing fact that renewable energy surpassed coal as a proportion of U.S. energy production, the share of renewable energy used in the United States is still low by international standards.

They note that in 2015, the most recent year from which reliable statistics were available as they compiled their report, renewable energy represented just 13 percent of the mix in the U.S. They compare this to nearly a third of Germany’s energy coming from renewables (29 percent), and three-quarters of Brazil’s energy (74 percent) coming from the same renewable sources, mainly wind, solar and hydropower.

Devarajan and Cordella also have concerns about the future.

Yes, businesses and local governments have made great strides in balancing the initial negative impacts of Trump administration policies, but they fear that in order to undo the long-term damages current White House polices are inflicting on the environment, a future, “greener” administration intent on meeting the nation’s original Paris commitments may be forced to impose “draconian” emission cuts.

These, they say, may negatively affect firms’ profitability and cause them to be less green-minded in the future.

In their view, “all firms would be better off if they were mandated to adapt today to the standards that they will likely face in the future.”

To illustrate their point, the the authors turn to the issue of traffic congestion.

“While we would all be better off if we were forced to use public transportation instead of contributing to traffic jams, it is in no individual’s interest to leave their car home just to make others’ commute easier,” they write. “An efficient way to solve this tragedy of the commons, is to force all firms to abide by a stricter regulation.

“Of course, this is easier said than done when federal regulation is at the root of the problem. And it is unlikely that all states will agree on a common stricter regulation because, again, it will be in the interest of small states to free ride on the regulation enacted in the other states,” they write.

For larger states, the story is a different one. The authors say some states may have enough critical mass that their regulations have such a positive impact on the national level that they’d be willing to pay the price of stricter regulation, regardless of what other states do.

Devarajan and Cordella call this the “California effect,” which they explain as a very large state being willing to pay for the price of policies that affect the rest of the U.S. states because they are also significantly affected by them.

“In terms of the traffic example, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (and certainly the federal government) are big enough in Washington, D.C. that they could make their employees better off by banning their use of private transportation … [and] the remaining lawyers and lobbyists could (literally and figuratively) get free ride,” they write.

Climate

Oregon Climate Bill Is Dead, But Republican Lawmakers Still AWOL State News
Oregon Climate Bill Is Dead, But Republican Lawmakers Still AWOL
June 28, 2019
by Elin Johnson

With only days left in Oregon’s legislative session, a Democrat-backed climate bill is dead, and the awol Republican state senators who helped kill it now appear to be considering what to demand before they agree to return. Last week 11 Republican state senators bolted out of... Read More

Republican State Lawmakers In Oregon Go Missing Ahead of Climate Change Vote State News
Republican State Lawmakers In Oregon Go Missing Ahead of Climate Change Vote
June 24, 2019
by Dan McCue

Eleven Senate Republicans in Oregon high-tailed it out of the state capitol of Salem this past week, and the Democratic governor has ordered state police to go and round them up. At issue is a vote on House Bill 2020, a sweeping climate bill that would... Read More

New York Lawmakers Strike Deal on Ambitious Climate Plan State News
New York Lawmakers Strike Deal on Ambitious Climate Plan
June 19, 2019
by Dan McCue

Lawmakers in New York State reached a deal Tuesday on a sweeping climate bill that would require 70% of electricity used in the state to come from renewable sources such as wind, solar and hydro by 2030. The bill is a mash-up of Governor Andrew Cuomo's... Read More

Oregon to Pass Cap-and-Trade Legislation to Address Climate Change Climate
Oregon to Pass Cap-and-Trade Legislation to Address Climate Change
June 18, 2019
by Elin Johnson

Oregon is a step closer to becoming the second state in the nation, after California, to adopt a sweeping cap-and-trade-program. The bill passed the state House with a 36-24 vote on Monday after six hours of debate, and has been sent on to the state Senate,... Read More

Biden and Warren Propose Ambitious Plans on Climate Change, Reflecting Democratic Urgency 2020 Elections
Biden and Warren Propose Ambitious Plans on Climate Change, Reflecting Democratic Urgency

WASHINGTON — If Joe Biden had been inclined to take a middle-of-the-road approach toward climate change, he’s abandoned it, judging by the proposal he unveiled Tuesday — an aggressive $1.7-trillion, 10-year plan to combat warming that goes considerably further than the environmental agenda of the Obama... Read More

NOAA’s Official Forecast Calls for 4 to 8 Atlantic Hurricanes This Season Climate
NOAA’s Official Forecast Calls for 4 to 8 Atlantic Hurricanes This Season

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A federal hurricane forecast issued Thursday calls for a near-normal season this year, with four to eight hurricanes and up to 15 storms powerful enough to be given names. The forecast represents a potential decrease from the eight hurricanes seen last year... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top