Peters Helps Advance Bill to Lower Prescription Drug Prices From Committee
WASHINGTON – Rep. Scott Peters, D-Calif., helped advance H.R. 3, the Lower Drug Costs Now Act, joining the majority of his colleagues on the Energy and Commerce Committee in voting to send the measure on to the full House.
The measure, introduced in the House on Sept. 19, establishes several programs and requirements relating to lowering the prices of prescription drugs.
“No one in a nation as great as ours should have to choose between groceries and the medicine they need to survive and lead healthy lives,” Rep. Peters said after the 30-22 vote.
Calling the bill “a major overhaul of the drug pricing landscape” Peters explained that one provision of the bill will allow the federal government to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies in Medicare to lower drug costs for seniors and people living with chronic disease, among others.
Despite his support of the bill, Peters acknowledged it is not perfect.
“San Diego is home to tens of thousands of scientists, entrepreneurs, academics, and researchers who make drugs to treat diabetes, cystic fibrosis, Parkinson’s, and even cancer,” he said. “As we work to lower drug costs, we must preserve the unique innovation ecosystem in San Diego and the United States more broadly that continues to deliver breakthrough therapies and cures for our constituents.
“We want and need a market that continues to produce new drugs and therapies that can cure deadly and chronic disease. I made clear my concerns with parts of this bill, and received commitments from Chairman Pallone to work with me to address the parts I think must be improved,” Peters said.
Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., is chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
H.R. 3 includes three main mechanisms to help lower drug costs:
First, the bill enables the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to negotiate the price that Medicare pays for at least 25 of the highest-cost drugs without at least two competitors on the market each year.
The bill establishes an international reference price to inform the Secretary’s negotiation, and caps the price paid by the federal government for a drug at 120% of the average price paid by Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, Canada, Germany, and France.
For drugs that are new to the market or which are not available in those other countries, the Secretary would have authority to negotiate a 15% discount on the list price. If a drug manufacturer refuses to negotiate the price of a drug with the Secretary, the Secretary is authorized to institute an excise tax of 95% of revenue from the non-negotiated drug.
Second, the bill establishes an inflationary rebate program in Medicare Parts B and D that would tie annual price increases for either branded or generic drugs (including biologics and biosimilars) to inflation.
If a manufacturer increases prices in a given year above the rate of inflation, the federal government requires the manufacturer to rebate the difference between the price increase and the rate of inflation to the federal government.
Finally, the bill reimagines the cost-sharing structure for the Medicare Part D benefit. In doing so, Part D enrollees would spend a maximum of $2,000 out of pocket on drugs each year, and plan providers and drug manufacturers would cover more of the costs above $2,000 than they currently do.
After the committee vote, Rep. Pallone said, “We are one step closer to finally empowering the federal government to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for the American people.”
“The Lower Drug Costs Now Act levels the playing field by ensuring that Americans are not forced to pay three, four or ten times more than people in other countries for the same drugs. This transformative legislation will also save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars that we can reinvest in the search for new cures and treatments and strengthening our health care system,” he said.
In The News
WASHINGTON -- Members of Congress lashed into the Sackler family Thursday for its pharmaceutical company’s role in promoting a painkiller blamed for killing about 230,000 Americans. Lawmakers on the House Oversight and Reform Committee said the Sacklers and Purdue Pharma L.P. enriched themselves despite knowing about... Read More
A COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer Inc. may be on the horizon, but the cost of distributing vaccines across all 50 states and who will pay for that operation remains a huge stumbling block. What is clear is that much of the financial burden and logistical challenge of getting... Read More
Stocks surged around the world Monday after Pfizer announced that early results from trials of its coronavirus vaccine suggest the shots may be 90% effective at preventing COVID-19. But President-elect Joe Biden quickly reminded Americans that the good news does not mean it's time to abandon... Read More
President-elect Joe Biden's health care advisers have held talks with pharmaceutical-industry executives in which they discussed Operation Warp Speed, the U.S. development program for coronavirus vaccines and treatments, according to people familiar with the matter. Biden advisers met with companies that have COVID-19 vaccines or therapies in late-stage clinical trials... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on state regulation of prescription drug benefit companies in a case with potential impacts for health care across most of the country. Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association addresses a 2015 Arkansas law regulating how pharmacy benefit managers... Read More
WASHINGTON — The pharmaceutical industry’s leading lobby group said Tuesday it did not know of a meeting at the White House to discuss lowering prescription drug prices, after President Donald Trump said executives were coming in this week to negotiate. “We are not aware of any... Read More