What Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Confirmation Means for Tech Policy
COMMENTARY

April 8, 2022by Adam Kovacevich, CEO and Founder, Chamber of Progress
What Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Confirmation Means for Tech Policy
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris applaud Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as Harris speaks during an event on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Friday, April 8, 2022, celebrating the confirmation of Jackson as the first Black woman to reach the Supreme Court. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Hidden between the Republican political grandstanding and baseless attacks, soon-to-be Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson previewed her views on a crucial online speech protection at the recent Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

Anyone who wants online platforms to moderate and take down harmful online content should breathe a sigh of relief, especially in light of pending federal court challenges to social media laws in Florida and Texas.

During the hearings, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, asked Judge Jackson about the constitutionality of forcing online platforms to not discriminate against particular viewpoints. While prohibiting discrimination against “viewpoints” might sound good at first blush, it’s important to understand the context in which Lee asked the question.

Far-right lawmakers in states from Florida to Texas are currently pushing anti-content moderation legislation that would stop social media companies from taking down vaccine misinformation, hate speech, and posts from violent insurrectionists.

Effectively, these laws would force social media companies to leave up harmful posts — including what Lee referred to as “viewpoints” — even if a post violates community standards.

But when Judge Jackson was put on the spot by Lee, she offered a succinct and measured response, perfectly summing up the government’s role in content moderation and speech hosted by private companies.

“It would be relevant, I think, as to whether or not the government is seeking to regulate along viewpoint lines. Under the First Amendment that is something that is generally impermissible.”

In short, despite the best efforts of right-wing lawmakers in Texas, Florida and Georgia, every online platform — from leading players like Facebook to niche online comment forums — have a First Amendment right to moderate their sites. They can ban vaccine misinformation or anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, and enforce their terms of service without worrying about being sued for doing so.

It’s a right that’s been confirmed time and again in federal courts. After Florida passed a law that would prohibit social media platforms from taking down misinformation, a federal district court struck the law down for violating the First Amendment. Six months later, a federal court in Texas did the same, striking down a new law in the Lone Star State that would have prevented social media sites from moderating content on their own platforms.

While social media platforms’ First Amendment protections might seem settled, a radical Supreme Court justice could still have the power to upend the right of these platforms to take down harmful content.

Unfortunately, the incorrect belief that online platforms must host every QAnon conspiracy and Russian disinformation plot has already made its way all the way to the Supreme Court bench. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas made it clear in March that he’d like to see the court slash Section 230 protections and weaken laws protecting online platform moderation decisions.

Thankfully, Judge Jackson’s recent statements at her confirmation hearing indicate that the Supreme Court’s newest addition will uphold the law as it stands and protect the First Amendment right of social media companies to take down harmful content.

The truth is, there’s a lot of harmful content online that social media companies need to watch out for to keep their platforms safe. Twitter has employed artificial intelligence to proactively block and remove terrorist propaganda from its site. Google shared last month that it used similar algorithms to block or remove over 95 million fraudulent or inaccurate business reviews that violated its policies. And Meta disabled Facebook accounts spreading false information about COVID-19 linked to the Chinese government.

Reversing federal courts’ current interpretation of First Amendment protections for content moderation would disincentivize companies from making their platforms as safe and disinformation-free as possible.

Judge Jackson understands this, and for this and countless other reasons, we should celebrate her historic confirmation to the court.


Adam Kovacevich is CEO and founder of the Chamber of Progress, a new center-left tech industry policy coalition promoting technology’s progressive future. Chamber of Progress corporate partners include Amazon, Apple, Google and Facebook. You can reach the Chamber of Progress here and follow Adam on Twitter @adamkovac.

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Opinions

Ensuring Equity and Innovation in Kidney Care: a Call to Action During National Kidney Month

When you woke up this morning, you probably turned on the light, maybe looked at your phone or went to... Read More

When you woke up this morning, you probably turned on the light, maybe looked at your phone or went to get a glass of water, all without much thought. Electricity, phone service and running water are all essentials that we give little thought to until they’re... Read More

The American Rescue Plan Is (Still) Worth Celebrating

Just three years ago, our economy was in the midst of an unprecedented crisis. Communities across the nation were reeling... Read More

Just three years ago, our economy was in the midst of an unprecedented crisis. Communities across the nation were reeling not only from the health implications of the COVID pandemic, but also from high unemployment, business closures and frightening economic uncertainty. Bold and decisive action was... Read More

Cutting Through the Generative AI Noise: What Business Leaders Should Do Now

No matter what industry you’re in, there are two things that every business leader cares about: revenue growth and cost reduction. These are the... Read More

No matter what industry you’re in, there are two things that every business leader cares about: revenue growth and cost reduction. These are the metrics that CEOs talk about ad nauseam during earnings calls. They are the keys that unlock higher business valuations, individual performance bonuses and the ever elusive... Read More

Shield Our Eyes: Lawmakers Across the Country Must Ensure Eye Surgery Can Only Be Performed by Medical Eye Surgeons 

Training and experience matter, especially when health is on the line. Just as one would rightly be concerned to discover... Read More

Training and experience matter, especially when health is on the line. Just as one would rightly be concerned to discover a flight attendant, rather than a pilot, flying their airplane, so too would most people be alarmed to find the person performing surgery on and around... Read More

Fentanyl Kills More Than 150 Americans Each Day, but Some States Keep Overdose Rescue Medications Out of Reach 

Today’s growing overdose epidemic is being fueled by fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that is 50 times stronger than heroin and 100... Read More

Today’s growing overdose epidemic is being fueled by fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that is 50 times stronger than heroin and 100 times stronger than morphine. In fact, it’s so lethal that only a tiny amount — 2 milligrams, about the size of a pencil tip — can... Read More

Jones Act Reform Is Not a Party Issue

Many political disagreements divide neatly along party lines, but the protectionist Jones Act isn’t one of them.  In Congress and... Read More

Many political disagreements divide neatly along party lines, but the protectionist Jones Act isn’t one of them.  In Congress and state Capitols across America, politicians from the two major political parties can be found arguing for and against the law, which requires that all goods shipped between... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top