Building Startups, Not Walls: High-Skilled Immigration Policy Changes in the US
COMMENTARY

September 3, 2024by Fiona McEntee, Stephen Yale-Loehr & Dan Berger
Building Startups, Not Walls: High-Skilled Immigration Policy Changes in the US
FILE - Individuals walk through Miami International Airport on Nov. 22, 2023. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File)

It’s an interesting time to be an American. For us immigration lawyers, the tumultuous political climate adds further complexity.

From the nonstop coverage of the southern border, you might think that helping new arrivals fills our days. However, as immigration lawyers who work with scientists, startup founders, international students and researchers, we see a very different side to the immigration system.

You may also believe that immigration laws are changing rapidly. Not so. Congress has not reformed our legal immigration system since 1990. While the law hasn’t changed, immigration policy has, and often seesaws from one administration to the next.

Immigration law and policy will be key issues in the presidential campaign this fall.

Controversial Trump administration policies like the Muslim travel ban and family separation have received widespread attention. However, high-skilled and business immigration also suffered during his tenure, with sweeping policy changes upending the system. To quote Stuart Anderson in Forbes, “Although Donald Trump said he favored ‘merit-based’ immigration, his policy team never seemed to find high-skilled foreign nationals it wanted to let work in the United States.”

In contrast, the Biden-Harris administration has put forth a sustained effort to attract and retain global talent, especially those in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. This administration has coupled its rhetoric — “America’s greatest strength is our ability to attract global talent to strengthen our economy and technological competitiveness” — with several policy updates that have transformed business immigration.

One example is the recent revival of the International Entrepreneur Parole program. Unable to persuade Congress to enact a startup visa for immigrant founders, the Obama administration created IEP as an administrative alternative. This program gives special “parole” status to promising startup founders who raise significant funding from U.S.-based sources and can show that their business has a high potential for growth and job creation.

Unfortunately, the IEP program was created in the last month of the Obama administration and was effectively suspended during the Trump administration. 

In May 2021, immigration lawyers like us rejoiced when the Biden-Harris administration announced that it would revive the IEP program. Despite good intentions, the uncertainty surrounding processing times and procedural hurdles has resulted in IEP being largely unused until now. But with recent updates announcing the elimination of current IEP application backlogs and a commitment to deciding new applications as quickly as possible, the program may finally live up to its potential.

To date, only 94 IEP applications have been filed, with only 26 approvals. One of those approvals was filed by us (Fiona McEntee) and expedited and decided promptly. The founder, Mukul Patnaik, an incredible AI entrepreneur and founder of Portal, is already hiring and maximizing the potential of his startup. 

We are confident that we may soon see many more IEP cases filed and approved. That should bring us closer to the estimated hundreds of thousands of jobs these immigrant startup founders could create.

Our nation faces major challenges, like an aging population and a geopolitical rivalry with China and its larger talent pool. Thus, it’s more important than ever to maintain a competitive edge. This is especially true in STEM and emerging fields like AI and quantum computing, areas in which immigrants play an “outsized role.”

After many years of advocacy, IEP is finally a viable option for immigrant startup founders. It’s been a rollercoaster getting to this point.

Now that we’re here, our country cannot afford to go back.


Fiona McEntee is the managing attorney of McEntee Law Group. She can be reached on LinkedIn

Stephen Yale-Loehr is an attorney of counsel at Miller Mayer, LLP. He also teaches immigration law at Cornell Law School. He can be reached by email.

Dan Berger is joining Green & Spiegel as a partner and is an academic fellow at Cornell Law School. He can be reached on LinkedIn.

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Opinions

Health Care Needs a Public-Private Solution to Cyberthreats

The U.S. health care system is under attack. Cybersecurity breaches by hackers are escalating exponentially, with cybercriminals exploiting system vulnerabilities... Read More

The U.S. health care system is under attack. Cybersecurity breaches by hackers are escalating exponentially, with cybercriminals exploiting system vulnerabilities to perpetrate costly ransomware attacks and damaging data breaches. Ultimately, health care providers and technology vendors must find new ways to collaborate to lock down data in this... Read More

Biden’s Action Renews Attention to the Pardon Power

President Joe Biden’s recent pardon of his troubled son Hunter “for those offenses against the United States which he has... Read More

President Joe Biden’s recent pardon of his troubled son Hunter “for those offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from Jan. 1, 2014, through Dec. 1, 2024,” has once again focused the spotlight... Read More

Red (White) or Blue, Green Reigns Supreme in 2024 Election

Amid the bitterly divided electorate this political season, there were signs that Americans can come together on at least one... Read More

Amid the bitterly divided electorate this political season, there were signs that Americans can come together on at least one issue: access to the outdoors and nature. Protecting — or conserving — land and water cuts across party lines and unites communities and people regardless of... Read More

Congress: Protecting Genetic Data Is Worth Doing Right 

The House of Representatives recently passed a bill known as the BIOSECURE Act, which targets individual companies under the guise... Read More

The House of Representatives recently passed a bill known as the BIOSECURE Act, which targets individual companies under the guise of protecting personal genetic data. While data security is a good goal in theory, in practice this legislation has been overtaken by a flawed and possibly unconstitutional process... Read More

Polls Aren’t Just Wrong, They Propagate Racism and Sexism

Based on "objective" exit poll data, President-elect Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election because of “White men,” “Catholics” and those with... Read More

Based on "objective" exit poll data, President-elect Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election because of “White men,” “Catholics” and those with “no college degree.” Because it's "data," that can’t be racist or sexist, can it? Yes, it can. Data can be manipulated to tell any story you... Read More

Survey Shows a Majority of Seniors Oppose Government Drug Price Setting 

As Congress and the new Trump administration gear up for important health care policy debates, it's essential they listen to... Read More

As Congress and the new Trump administration gear up for important health care policy debates, it's essential they listen to the voices of those who rely most on government-funded health programs: America’s seniors.  The 2024 Senior Satisfaction Survey paints a clear picture of the concerns of older Americans... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top