Nadler Prepares Contempt Vote for McGahn — but What Are the Consequences?

May 22, 2019by Griffin Connolly

WASHINGTON — House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler is preparing a committee vote to hold former White House counsel Don McGahn in contempt of Congress, the second Trump official to get such treatment for defying one of Nadler’s subpoenas to testify about the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“Let me be clear: This committee will hear Mr. McGahn’s testimony, even if we have to go to court to secure it. We will not allow the president to prevent the American people from hearing from this witness,” Nadler said at a hearing Tuesday for McGahn that the former White House lawyer skipped per the administration’s orders.

The White House argued in a letter to Nadler Monday that McGahn has ”absolute immunity” and is not legally required to comply with a congressional subpoena, citing an internal Justice Department opinion that determined Congress cannot compel the president’s senior advisers to testify about their official duties.

Nadler summarily dismissed that line of reasoning Tuesday as he foreshadowed a contempt vote. The vote is expected to occur when Congress returns from its recess in June.

“President Trump may think he can hide behind his lawyers as he launches a series of baseless legal arguments designed to obstruct our work,” Nadler said. “He cannot think these legal arguments will prevail in court. He thinks he can slow us down and run out the clock on the American people.”

Voting to hold McGahn in contempt of Congress will not, in itself, trigger a series of consequences to compel evidence and testimony from the former Trump lawyer that Nadler seeks.

After moving forward with a contempt vote presumably later this week, Nadler, with input from Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders, must decide which of the three traditional contempt enforcement mechanisms to deploy: dispatching the House Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest and detain McGahn; referring a criminal case to the Justice Department, which could lead to McGahn jailed or fined until he complies with the subpoena; or filing a civil case against him.

Some lawmakers and most legal experts have dismissed the first option, known as “inherent contempt,” as bizarre and overly confrontational. The Sergeant-at-Arms hasn’t arrested someone for contempt of Congress since 1934.

A criminal proceeding requires that the Justice Department actively pursue the referred case against McGahn, unlikely since Attorney General William Barr, whom Judiciary Democrats voted to hold in contempt earlier this month, leads the department.

A civil contempt case against McGahn does not require compliance from the executive branch, but could drag out for years in court and possibly outlast Trump’s presidency. Plus judges are wary of adjudicating constitutional power struggles between the executive and legislative branches.

There could be a fourth option.

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff indicated earlier this month that he is exploring the legal basis for Congress to levy fines against officials who flout congressional subpoenas demanding their testimony.

“We’re looking through the history and studying the law to make sure we’re on solid ground,” Schiff said. “You could fine someone $25,000 a day until they comply. You can do that,” the California Democrat said.

If Democrats determine that they are indeed on sound legal ground to fine administration officials for refusing to cooperate with a subpoena — as judges routinely fine people who disrupt proceedings — Nadler could use that option to squeeze the pocketbooks of Barr and McGahn until they comply. Such swift action could help Democrats procure the information they want in a much timelier fashion than the three traditional enforcement mechanisms.

But Democrats could have yet another button on the table, a button that some members of leadership have already suggested Pelosi and Nadler should press: impeachment.

Rep. David Cicilline said Monday that if McGahn followed through on his planned no-show for the hearing Tuesday, Democrats should begin an impeachment proceeding against the president as a legal grounds for obtaining the documents and testimony they’ve requested and repeatedly been denied.

“This is a coverup by the White House, and there comes a point where we have to stand up for the rule of law,” Cicilline, a Rhode Island Democrat on the Judiciary panel, said Monday. “It is not just about this president. It is about future presidents. It’s about the message it sends about our respect for the Constitution and for the rule of law. And if this pattern by the president continues, where he’s going to impede and prevent and undermine our ability to gather evidence to do our job, we’re going to be left with no choice.”

Other Democratic leaders have resisted calls to begin an impeachment proceeding as a mechanism to force compliance from a resistant administration.

“I agree with Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi that the case should be compelling, the evidence must be overwhelming and the sentiment around impeachment should be bipartisan in nature,” the Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York said. “We’re still in the fact-gathering process.”


Lindsey McPherson contributed to this report.


©2019 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., All Rights Reserved

Visit CQ Roll Call at

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Blue Dogs Seek to Secure U.S. Elections, Deter Future Interference Elections
Blue Dogs Seek to Secure U.S. Elections, Deter Future Interference
June 21, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - After playing a critical role in passing a sweeping election and ethics reform bill, the Blue Dog Coalition of House Democrats on Friday unveiled a package of legislative proposals aimed at securing U.S. elections and deterring future interference by Russia or any other bad... Read More

Congress Did Not Violate 'Nondelegation' Doctrine In Handling of Sex Offender Law Congress
Congress Did Not Violate 'Nondelegation' Doctrine In Handling of Sex Offender Law
June 21, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court held Thursday that Congress did not unlawfully delegate its authority to another branch of government when it left it to the attorney general to decide how to apply a sex offender law's requirements before it was enacted. The case came... Read More

Tensions High During Committee Hearing On Reparations for African Americans Civil Rights
Tensions High During Committee Hearing On Reparations for African Americans
June 21, 2019
by Elin Johnson

WASHINGTON - A House Judiciary subcommittee held the first congressional hearing in more than a decade on whether the federal government should consider compensating the descendants of slaves in the United States. Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, who became the sponsor of a measure to study... Read More

Congressional Leaders at Odds Over Pay Raise for Lawmakers Congress
Congressional Leaders at Odds Over Pay Raise for Lawmakers

WASHINGTON — Congressional leaders seem to be on a collision course over the issue of raising members’ pay, as the two majority leaders in the House and Senate are heading in opposite directions on the politically fraught issue. House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer told CQ... Read More

Schumer Pushes for Vote to Make Clear Trump Needs Congressional Approval for War With Iran Congress
Schumer Pushes for Vote to Make Clear Trump Needs Congressional Approval for War With Iran

WASHINGTON — Returning to Capitol Hill after a meeting at the White House about the shooting down of an American drone, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer increased the pressure for a floor vote to make clear that authorization would be needed for military action against... Read More

Trump, Canada's Trudeau Talk Trade and China at White House Meeting Trade
Trump, Canada's Trudeau Talk Trade and China at White House Meeting
June 20, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump welcomed Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to the White House Thursday, to talk trade and their respective issues with China on a day otherwise dominated by concerns over an escalation in hostilities between the U.S. and Iran. Even as he stepped... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top