McGahn Defies Subpoena, No-Show at House Hearing

May 21, 2019 by Dan McCue
White House counsel Don McGahn listens to Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testify before a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on September 27, 2018. (Jim Bourg/Sipa USA/TNS)

House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., on Tuesday opened the panel’s hearing on Russia interference in the 2016 election by warning the visibly absent former White House Counsel Don McGahn that he will be held in contempt for failing to appear despite the committee’s subpoena.

“Our subpoenas are not optional,” Nadler said as he stared down the empty witness chair and the placard reading “Mr. Donald F. McGahn II.”

Nadler went on to say the House Judiciary Committee will hear from McGahn one way or another, adding “The committee will have no choice but to enforce the subpoena against him.”

“We will not allow the president to stop this investigation,” the chairman added.

Nadler later issued subpoenas to McGahn’s former chief of staff, Annie Donaldson, and former White House communications director Hope Hicks.

Spectators said they turned out for the Tuesday’s brief hearing just to take in the sight of the empty chair and the verbal fireworks they knew would follow the banging of the chairman’s gavel.

President Donald Trump ratcheted up the clash between the executive branch and Capitol Hill on Monday by instructing McGahn to ignore the committee’s subpoena.

That directive came soon after the Justice Department released a 15-page legal opinion arguing the former White House counsel had no legal obligation to comply.

“Congress may not constitutionally compel the President’s senior advisers to testify about their official duties,” the Office of Legal Counsel opinion stated.

It continued: “The immunity of the President’s immediate advisers from compelled congressional testimony on matters related to their official responsibilities has long been recognized and arises from the fundamental workings of the separation of powers.”

In a written statement released Monday night, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said “this action has been taken … to ensure that future presidents can effectively execute the responsibilities of the Office of the Presidency.”

Democrats on the judiciary panel contend that it is important to hear from McGahn so that they can better understand the president’s handling and statements related to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian election interference and possible collusion with members of the Trump campaign.

But Representative Doug Collins, R-Ga., the ranking Republican on the committee said Tuesday’s hearing was little more than a “circus”.

Democrats are “trying desperately to make something out of nothing,” he said.

The committee voted to adjourn the hearing following Collins’ remarks.

McGahn’s refusal to testify is just the latest move by the White House to block Democratic investigations into the administration, its ties to Russia, and the president’s outside business activities.

The House Judiciary Committee voted to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt earlier this month after he declined to provide an unredacted version of special counsel Mueller’s report.

The House intelligence committee is expected to vote on a separate “enforcement action” against the Justice Department this week after Barr declined a similar request from it.

McGahn’s lawyer, William Burck, said in a letter to Nadler that McGahn is “conscious of the duties he, as an attorney, owes to his former client” and would decline to appear Tuesday.

But Burck went on to suggest that there’s room to negotiate with the White House over his client’s testimony.

He said McGahn “again finds himself facing contradictory instructions from two co-equal branches of government.”

In a Monday night letter to McGahn, Nadler promised to use “all enforcement mechanisms” available to force McGahn to testify, threatening “serious consequences” if he did not show up.

McGahn was a key figure in Mueller’s investigation and is cited 157 times in the special counsel’s report — more than any other interviewee. Democrats hope to question him as a way to focus attention on Mueller’s findings and further investigate whether Trump did obstruct justice.

Tuesday’s brief hearing took place against a backdrop of increasing calls for the judiciary committee to start a formal impeachment inquiry against the president.

During a closed door Democratic leadership meeting on Monday afternoon, at least five attendees pressed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to allow such a step, arguing, according to the Washington Post, that it “would help investigators obtain documents and testimony Trump has blocked.”

Nadler met separately with Pelosi after the session and also reportedly made the case for starting such an inquiry.

Afterwards he said, “the president’s continuing lawless conduct is making it harder and harder to rule out impeachment or any other enforcement action.”

So far, Pelosi has been content to take a methodical approach to the House’s running battles with the president, saying witnesses should be called, subpoenaed if they fail to appear, and then, if they still defy Congress, that matter should be turned over to the courts.

Democrats got an indication this strategy is working Monday night when a federal judge ruled against Trump on Monday in a financial records dispute with the House. Trump’s team filed notice Tuesday that they would appeal.

In the meantime, calls for Trump’s impeachment became bipartisan for the first time Saturday, when Representative Justin Amash, R-Mich., said it’s clear from the Mueller report the president committed obstruction of justice during the special counsel’s investigation.

On Monday, the House Freedom Caucus, a conservative Republican caucus, voted to formally condemn Amash.

On Tuesday, Amash refused to bow to such pressure, saying he hasn’t ruled out challenging Trump for the White House as a Libertarian.

As for McGahn, a contempt vote is not expected to take place until June, as Congress is about to leave town for a weeklong recess.

Political News

ABA Thanks Rep. Cuellar for Promoting Pro-Growth Economic Policies
Political News
ABA Thanks Rep. Cuellar for Promoting Pro-Growth Economic Policies
February 21, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON — The American Bankers Association, in partnership with the Texas Bankers Association, threw its support behind Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, this week, and urged Texans to join in supporting his efforts. In a series of new ads launched Wednesday, the organization, which serves as the... Read More

State of The Union: Democrats, Republicans Brace for a Hostile Trump
Political News
State of The Union: Democrats, Republicans Brace for a Hostile Trump

WASHINGTON — Democrats and Republican lawmakers are bracing for a whole new level of partisan belligerence from President Donald Trump at the State of the Union on Tuesday, less than 24 hours before the Senate is expected to vote to acquit him of both articles of... Read More

Bipartisan Policy Center Unveils Blueprint for Higher Ed Reform
Education
Bipartisan Policy Center Unveils Blueprint for Higher Ed Reform
January 31, 2020
by Kate Michael

WASHINGTON - A new report released by D.C.-based think tank,  Bipartisan Policy Center, hopes to create a “bipartisan blueprint” for higher education reform.  Attaining a post-secondary degree is believed to be vital for success in today’s workforce, lauded for long-term financial gain, job stability, career satisfaction,... Read More

What Happens If Senators Are Tied 50-50 on Whether to Call Impeachment Witnesses?
Impeachment
What Happens If Senators Are Tied 50-50 on Whether to Call Impeachment Witnesses?

WASHINGTON — With increasing prospects of a 50-50 tie on the Friday vote to subpoena witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial, Democrats are considering how they might be able to nudge Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. to weigh in on the issue and break the... Read More

Impeachment Trial Likely to End Quickly After Key Republican to Vote Against Witnesses
Impeachment
Impeachment Trial Likely to End Quickly After Key Republican to Vote Against Witnesses

WASHINGTON — With the announcement from a key Republican that he won’t back a call for witnesses in President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, Republicans are likely to wrap up the trial quickly, perhaps as soon as Friday evening. Democrats’ hopes for witnesses dwindled when one of... Read More

Former Google CEO Warns Congress About U.S. Losing Technology Lead
Technology
Former Google CEO Warns Congress About U.S. Losing Technology Lead
January 30, 2020
by Tom Ramstack

WASHINGTON - Google’s former chief executive officer told Congress Wednesday the United States would lose its lead in artificial intelligence technology to China in less than a decade unless the federal government creates incentives for new research and development. “In other words, unless trends change, we... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top