Maryland Court to Decide if Pandemic Requires Insurers to Cover Businesses

September 12, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Maryland Court to Decide if Pandemic Requires Insurers to Cover Businesses
(Photo by Kate Sade via UnSplash)

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland’s high court is expected to rule soon on whether insurers for corporations whose businesses suffered because of the COVID-19 pandemic must cover the lost income.

On Friday, the Maryland Court of Appeals heard arguments from fashion company Tapestry, Inc., which says it lost $652 million in the year after the pandemic reached the United States. In the year before the pandemic, it earned more than $643 million.

Factory Mutual Insurance Co. argued that Tapestry failed to prove it suffered property damage that could initiate its insurance coverage.

Most states have sided with the insurers in similar cases but several of the lawsuits are pending.

“To cushion the impact of the coronavirus and COVID-19, Tapestry turned to its property insurer, [Factory Mutual], to whom Tapestry paid over $10 million in premiums in exchange for $2 billion in property damage and time element (also known as business interruption) coverage during the policy periods,” the Tapestry lawsuit says. “FM, however, declined to fulfill its obligations to Tapestry under the policies.”

New York-based Tapestry owns well-known fashion brands like Coach and Kate Spade.

As evidence of its losses from the pandemic, the company said in an October 2021 court filing that at least 1,676 Tapestry employees were diagnosed with COVID-19.

The illnesses proved the virus was present on its job site, which had the effect of degrading the property, the company’s attorneys argued. They compared the virus to other toxic substances, like ammonia and carbon monoxide, that make a property unsafe by transforming the air inside.

They cited previous cases where courts allowed business loss insurance coverage when the diseases that caused the losses were E. coli and Legionnaires’ disease.

They also said Tapestry’s policy with Factory Mutual covered “all risks of physical loss or damage,” not just the “direct physical loss or damage” found in most business insurance.

Factory Mutual denied Tapestry coverage in a letter about two weeks after the fashion company filed its claim.

“As a result of FM’s breaches of contract, Tapestry has suffered and continues to suffer damage in an amount to be proven at trial, but currently estimated to exceed hundreds of millions of dollars in damages,” Tapestry’s legal complaint says.

Tapestry’s choice of Maryland state courts reflects a revised strategy among businesses claiming insurance coverage for their losses during the pandemic.

The first lawsuits were filed in federal courts, where the insurers almost uniformly won against the claims.

In a January 2021 federal court ruling, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia ruled for an insurer while writing, “In short, the pandemic impacts human health and human behavior, not physical structures. … But the unambiguous terms of the policy do not provide coverage for solely economic losses unaccompanied by physical property damage.”

More recently, businesses have been filing their lawsuits in state courts in hopes of winning a more sympathetic audience.

The high courts in Iowa, Massachusetts, South Carolina, Washington and Wisconsin have generally ruled for the insurance companies. They have given slightly varying interpretations of whether the presence of the virus on job sites degrades the value of the property.

The hearing last Friday before the Maryland Court of Appeals indicated the judges were leaning toward a ruling for Factory Mutual Insurance.

Judge Steven B. Gould said, “I’m having trouble understanding a concept of property damage that literally goes away if you do nothing. I’m not aware of any other type of damage to property where you can do nothing and it goes back to where it was.”

Judge Matthew J. Fader said, “I’m having trouble conceptually with understanding a concept of property damage that could be completely absolved by an effective vaccine.”

The case is Tapestry Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Co. in the Maryland Court of Appeals.

Tom can be reached at [email protected] and @TomRamstack

A+
a-
  • business losses
  • COVID-19
  • insurance
  • insurers
  • Maryland
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Litigation

    June 20, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Open Door to Multiple-Venue Challenges to E-Cigarette Rules

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco product if not for... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco product if not for the Food and Drug Administration’s rejection of the product, can sue to seek judicial review of the agency’s decision. The 7-2 ruling by the court in... Read More

    June 18, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    American Bar Association Sues Trump Over Executive Orders Against Law Firms

    WASHINGTON — The American Bar Association is suing the Trump administration over the president's recent executive orders retaliating against law... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The American Bar Association is suing the Trump administration over the president's recent executive orders retaliating against law firms that opposed his policies. The lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., says Trump's orders that have the effect of curtailing the... Read More

    June 17, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Purdue Pharma to Pay $7.4B Over Its Sales of Painkiller OxyContin

    WASHINGTON — Attorneys general nationwide announced their approval Monday of a $7.4 billion settlement with pharmaceutical manufacturer Purdue Pharma over... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Attorneys general nationwide announced their approval Monday of a $7.4 billion settlement with pharmaceutical manufacturer Purdue Pharma over what they say was the company's inappropriate marketing of opioids. The powerful painkillers have been blamed for thousands of deaths each year and many thousands more... Read More

    June 13, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Police Officers Sue to Force Memorial for Jan. 6 Defenders of the Capitol

    WASHINGTON — Two police officers who tried to hold back rioters during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection in Washington, D.C.,... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Two police officers who tried to hold back rioters during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection in Washington, D.C., filed a lawsuit Thursday seeking a court order requiring that a plaque be hung in the Capitol honoring police who protected lawmakers and their staff. The... Read More

    June 10, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Proud Boys Sue Justice Dept. for $100M Over Jan. 6 Capitol Riot Prosecutions

    ORLANDO, Fla. — Five leaders of the Proud Boys are suing the U.S. government over what they describe as politically... Read More

    ORLANDO, Fla. — Five leaders of the Proud Boys are suing the U.S. government over what they describe as politically motivated prosecutions for their participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol. Each of them was convicted on criminal charges for trying to violently... Read More

    May 27, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    NPR, Three Public Radio Stations Sue Trump Over Planned Funding Cut

    WASHINGTON — National Public Radio and three public radio stations in Colorado sued President Donald Trump and other administration officials... Read More

    WASHINGTON — National Public Radio and three public radio stations in Colorado sued President Donald Trump and other administration officials on Tuesday over an executive order aimed at ceasing federal funding for them and similar media outlets. In addition to the president, the other defendants named... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top