Maryland Court to Decide if Pandemic Requires Insurers to Cover Businesses

September 12, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Maryland Court to Decide if Pandemic Requires Insurers to Cover Businesses
(Photo by Kate Sade via UnSplash)

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland’s high court is expected to rule soon on whether insurers for corporations whose businesses suffered because of the COVID-19 pandemic must cover the lost income.

On Friday, the Maryland Court of Appeals heard arguments from fashion company Tapestry, Inc., which says it lost $652 million in the year after the pandemic reached the United States. In the year before the pandemic, it earned more than $643 million.

Factory Mutual Insurance Co. argued that Tapestry failed to prove it suffered property damage that could initiate its insurance coverage.

Most states have sided with the insurers in similar cases but several of the lawsuits are pending.

“To cushion the impact of the coronavirus and COVID-19, Tapestry turned to its property insurer, [Factory Mutual], to whom Tapestry paid over $10 million in premiums in exchange for $2 billion in property damage and time element (also known as business interruption) coverage during the policy periods,” the Tapestry lawsuit says. “FM, however, declined to fulfill its obligations to Tapestry under the policies.”

New York-based Tapestry owns well-known fashion brands like Coach and Kate Spade.

As evidence of its losses from the pandemic, the company said in an October 2021 court filing that at least 1,676 Tapestry employees were diagnosed with COVID-19.

The illnesses proved the virus was present on its job site, which had the effect of degrading the property, the company’s attorneys argued. They compared the virus to other toxic substances, like ammonia and carbon monoxide, that make a property unsafe by transforming the air inside.

They cited previous cases where courts allowed business loss insurance coverage when the diseases that caused the losses were E. coli and Legionnaires’ disease.

They also said Tapestry’s policy with Factory Mutual covered “all risks of physical loss or damage,” not just the “direct physical loss or damage” found in most business insurance.

Factory Mutual denied Tapestry coverage in a letter about two weeks after the fashion company filed its claim.

“As a result of FM’s breaches of contract, Tapestry has suffered and continues to suffer damage in an amount to be proven at trial, but currently estimated to exceed hundreds of millions of dollars in damages,” Tapestry’s legal complaint says.

Tapestry’s choice of Maryland state courts reflects a revised strategy among businesses claiming insurance coverage for their losses during the pandemic.

The first lawsuits were filed in federal courts, where the insurers almost uniformly won against the claims.

In a January 2021 federal court ruling, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia ruled for an insurer while writing, “In short, the pandemic impacts human health and human behavior, not physical structures. … But the unambiguous terms of the policy do not provide coverage for solely economic losses unaccompanied by physical property damage.”

More recently, businesses have been filing their lawsuits in state courts in hopes of winning a more sympathetic audience.

The high courts in Iowa, Massachusetts, South Carolina, Washington and Wisconsin have generally ruled for the insurance companies. They have given slightly varying interpretations of whether the presence of the virus on job sites degrades the value of the property.

The hearing last Friday before the Maryland Court of Appeals indicated the judges were leaning toward a ruling for Factory Mutual Insurance.

Judge Steven B. Gould said, “I’m having trouble understanding a concept of property damage that literally goes away if you do nothing. I’m not aware of any other type of damage to property where you can do nothing and it goes back to where it was.”

Judge Matthew J. Fader said, “I’m having trouble conceptually with understanding a concept of property damage that could be completely absolved by an effective vaccine.”

The case is Tapestry Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Co. in the Maryland Court of Appeals.

Tom can be reached at [email protected] and @TomRamstack

A+
a-
  • business losses
  • COVID-19
  • insurance
  • insurers
  • Maryland
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Litigation

    February 16, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Environmentalists Sue EPA for Data on Health Risks of Forever Chemicals

    WASHINGTON — Environmentalists sued the Environmental Protection Agency this week in federal court in Washington, D.C., seeking information about health... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Environmentalists sued the Environmental Protection Agency this week in federal court in Washington, D.C., seeking information about health risks from forever chemicals in fluorinated plastic containers. The two groups that sued accuse the EPA of withholding information about PFAS. They are called forever chemicals... Read More

    February 6, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    DC Appellate Court Rejects Trump's Immunity Claim

    WASHINGTON — A court of appeals in the District of Columbia has rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim that he... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A court of appeals in the District of Columbia has rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from prosecution for allegedly interfering in the 2020 presidential election. In a unanimous, 57-page ruling, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of... Read More

    February 1, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Trump Lawsuit Over Steele Dossier Dismissed by Judge in London

    LONDON, U.K. — A judge in London dismissed a lawsuit Thursday that former President Donald Trump filed against the British... Read More

    LONDON, U.K. — A judge in London dismissed a lawsuit Thursday that former President Donald Trump filed against the British intelligence agent who wrote the "Steele Dossier" describing his questionable links to the Russian government. Trump’s lawsuit called the accusations lies that hurt his reputation. Judge... Read More

    January 31, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Couple Claims ‘Healthy’ Snack Left Children With Lead Poisoning

    HICKORY, N.C. — A North Carolina couple claimed in court that the manufacturer of a fruit puree they bought as... Read More

    HICKORY, N.C. — A North Carolina couple claimed in court that the manufacturer of a fruit puree they bought as a healthy snack for their kids negligently sold products contaminated with large amounts of lead, leading to concerns the children will face life-long health issues. In... Read More

    January 29, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Walmart Sued in Class Action Over Alleged Pricing Deception

    WASHINGTON — Walmart is being sued over allegations it charges higher prices for products at the checkout stands than it... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Walmart is being sued over allegations it charges higher prices for products at the checkout stands than it advertises on its shelves. The consumer class action lawsuits started in Chicago, Illinois, but are spreading, most recently to a court filing last week in Washington,... Read More

    January 5, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    SpaceX Lawsuit Opposes Authority of National Labor Relations Board

    HOUSTON — SpaceX sued the National Labor Relations Board Thursday in a lawsuit that seeks to undercut the agency's fundamental... Read More

    HOUSTON — SpaceX sued the National Labor Relations Board Thursday in a lawsuit that seeks to undercut the agency's fundamental authority to rule in workplace disputes. SpaceX hit back with the lawsuit one day after the NLRB filed a labor complaint against the company.  The NLRB... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top