ExxonMobil Climate Change Lawsuit to Proceed

May 25, 2022 by Reece Nations
ExxonMobil Climate Change Lawsuit to Proceed
The logo for ExxonMobil appears above a trading post on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Oct. 8, 2019. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

BOSTON — ExxonMobil will have to defend its business practices in Massachusetts after a lawsuit concerning the oil and gas giant’s role in propagating climate change was allowed to proceed on Tuesday.

 The Massachusetts Supreme Court dismissed Exxon’s special motion to dismiss a state lawsuit alleging that the company misled investors about the risks posed by fossil fuel-driven climate change to its business model. Attorney General Maura Healey sued Exxon in 2019 for falsely advertising itself and its products as environmentally responsible despite the company’s history of deception.

Exxon moved for the dismissal of Healey’s lawsuit under the state’s Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation statute. The so-called anti-SLAPP law allows defendants to dismiss litigation if it improperly targets protected petitioning activities. The state Supreme Court unanimously rejected Exxon’s motion on a 7–0 vote, stating that Healey’s lawsuit wasn’t applicable to the statute.

“Construing the anti-SLAPP statute to apply to the attorney general would place significant roadblocks to the enforcement of the Commonwealth’s laws,” Justice Scott Kafker wrote in the court’s opinion. 

ExxonMobil Corporate Media Relations Manager Casey Norton told The Well News the company was “reviewing the [court’s] decision and evaluating next steps.”

The decision is immediately appealable, according to the court’s opinion.

The lawsuit was filed after Healey launched a civil investigation in 2016 under the suspicion that the company violated the Massachusetts consumer protection statute. Healey’s office amended the complaint in June 2020 with new allegations claiming the COVID-19 pandemic made Exxon’s business model even more vulnerable to market fluctuations which were subsequently downplayed to investors and consumers.

Exxon’s knowledge of climate change dates back to June 1978, when a senior scientist with the company informed executives the general scientific consensus at that time was that global climate change was being caused by humans through the burning of fossil fuels, according to company documents.

Despite this revelation, Healey’s lawsuit alleges Exxon undertook a “sophisticated, multi-million dollar campaign” to stoke doubt over whether climate change was occurring and what role fossil fuels played in causing it.

For instance, Exxon significantly influenced the United States’ decision not to adopt the Kyoto Protocol in 1992. The protocol was an international treaty that was built upon the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change which committed the adopting countries to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

Exxon funded a series of economic models that sought to sway public opinion against mandatory climate policy under the threat of job losses and dire outcomes for the U.S. economy, according to a 2002 study conducted by international researchers. 

Additionally, Exxon helped form the Global Climate Coalition in 1989 shortly after the founding of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

GCC’s mission statement refuted the scientific consensus around greenhouse gas emissions, and in 1997, it conducted lobbying efforts to prevent significant climate policy outcomes from international negotiations.

According to Federal Election Commission filings, Exxon has contributed $26,456,997 to political campaigns since 1990 and spent $293,412,742 on lobbying since 1998.

In 2007, the Union of Concerned Scientists issued a report detailing Exxon’s mirroring of tobacco industry tactics to illicit favorable political outcomes. The organization’s report posits evidence showing Exxon funding a “network of ideological and advocacy organizations” that worked to generate uncertainty on the issue of human-caused climate change.

“Exxon’s repeated attempts to stonewall our lawsuit have been baseless, and this effort was no different,” Healey’s office told The Well News. “We look forward to proceeding with our case and having our day in court to show how Exxon is breaking the law and to put an end to the deception once and for all.” 

Reece can be reached at [email protected] and https://twitter.com/ReeceNWrites

A+
a-
  • Boston
  • climate change
  • ExxonMobil
  • Litigation
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Litigation

    May 5, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Eighteen AGs Sue Trump Administration Over Wind Farm Policies

    WASHINGTON — A coalition of 18 attorneys general representing 17 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A coalition of 18 attorneys general representing 17 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration on Monday over what they are calling its “unlawful attempt” to freeze the development of wind energy. In a 101-page complaint filed in federal court in... Read More

    April 25, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Government Lawyers Mistakenly Admit New York Congestion Pricing Is Legal

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration’s lawyers appear to have booby-trapped their own chances this week of defeating New York City’s... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration’s lawyers appear to have booby-trapped their own chances this week of defeating New York City’s congestion pricing program that charges motorists for driving downtown. They inadvertently filed a memo with the court overseeing a lawsuit between the state and federal government... Read More

    April 22, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Federal Trade Commission Sues Uber Alleging Deceit in Subscriptions

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Federal Trade Commission sued rideshare company Uber Technologies Inc. Monday, alleging a pattern of deceit against... Read More

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Federal Trade Commission sued rideshare company Uber Technologies Inc. Monday, alleging a pattern of deceit against consumers intended to maximize profits. The lawsuit says Uber used hidden charges, failed to deliver on promised savings and made it difficult for customers to cancel... Read More

    April 15, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Meta’s Zuckerberg Defends Against Allegations of Monopoly Tactics

    WASHINGTON — Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg testified for a second day Tuesday in a Washington, D.C., court that... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg testified for a second day Tuesday in a Washington, D.C., court that his company has encouraged the growth of social media but not the anticompetitive dominance alleged by the Federal Trade Commission. The trial in the antitrust case... Read More

    April 4, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Protests and New Lawsuit Follow Trump’s Economic Announcements 

    PENSACOLA, Fla. — The first lawsuit was filed Thursday to oppose President Donald Trump's tariffs on China in a growing... Read More

    PENSACOLA, Fla. — The first lawsuit was filed Thursday to oppose President Donald Trump's tariffs on China in a growing tide of protests against his administration. The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed the lawsuit on behalf of a small Florida business that sells stationery and other... Read More

    March 20, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    New York’s Top Court Nixes Bid for Noncitizen Voting in NYC

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York state’s highest court on Thursday ended an effort by the New York City Council to... Read More

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York state’s highest court on Thursday ended an effort by the New York City Council to allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections. Though the local law never went into effect, the Democrat-led city council heralded its passage in December 2021, calling... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top