ExxonMobil Climate Change Lawsuit to Proceed

May 25, 2022 by Reece Nations
ExxonMobil Climate Change Lawsuit to Proceed
The logo for ExxonMobil appears above a trading post on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Oct. 8, 2019. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

BOSTON — ExxonMobil will have to defend its business practices in Massachusetts after a lawsuit concerning the oil and gas giant’s role in propagating climate change was allowed to proceed on Tuesday.

 The Massachusetts Supreme Court dismissed Exxon’s special motion to dismiss a state lawsuit alleging that the company misled investors about the risks posed by fossil fuel-driven climate change to its business model. Attorney General Maura Healey sued Exxon in 2019 for falsely advertising itself and its products as environmentally responsible despite the company’s history of deception.

Exxon moved for the dismissal of Healey’s lawsuit under the state’s Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation statute. The so-called anti-SLAPP law allows defendants to dismiss litigation if it improperly targets protected petitioning activities. The state Supreme Court unanimously rejected Exxon’s motion on a 7–0 vote, stating that Healey’s lawsuit wasn’t applicable to the statute.

“Construing the anti-SLAPP statute to apply to the attorney general would place significant roadblocks to the enforcement of the Commonwealth’s laws,” Justice Scott Kafker wrote in the court’s opinion. 

ExxonMobil Corporate Media Relations Manager Casey Norton told The Well News the company was “reviewing the [court’s] decision and evaluating next steps.”

The decision is immediately appealable, according to the court’s opinion.

The lawsuit was filed after Healey launched a civil investigation in 2016 under the suspicion that the company violated the Massachusetts consumer protection statute. Healey’s office amended the complaint in June 2020 with new allegations claiming the COVID-19 pandemic made Exxon’s business model even more vulnerable to market fluctuations which were subsequently downplayed to investors and consumers.

Exxon’s knowledge of climate change dates back to June 1978, when a senior scientist with the company informed executives the general scientific consensus at that time was that global climate change was being caused by humans through the burning of fossil fuels, according to company documents.

Despite this revelation, Healey’s lawsuit alleges Exxon undertook a “sophisticated, multi-million dollar campaign” to stoke doubt over whether climate change was occurring and what role fossil fuels played in causing it.

For instance, Exxon significantly influenced the United States’ decision not to adopt the Kyoto Protocol in 1992. The protocol was an international treaty that was built upon the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change which committed the adopting countries to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

Exxon funded a series of economic models that sought to sway public opinion against mandatory climate policy under the threat of job losses and dire outcomes for the U.S. economy, according to a 2002 study conducted by international researchers. 

Additionally, Exxon helped form the Global Climate Coalition in 1989 shortly after the founding of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

GCC’s mission statement refuted the scientific consensus around greenhouse gas emissions, and in 1997, it conducted lobbying efforts to prevent significant climate policy outcomes from international negotiations.

According to Federal Election Commission filings, Exxon has contributed $26,456,997 to political campaigns since 1990 and spent $293,412,742 on lobbying since 1998.

In 2007, the Union of Concerned Scientists issued a report detailing Exxon’s mirroring of tobacco industry tactics to illicit favorable political outcomes. The organization’s report posits evidence showing Exxon funding a “network of ideological and advocacy organizations” that worked to generate uncertainty on the issue of human-caused climate change.

“Exxon’s repeated attempts to stonewall our lawsuit have been baseless, and this effort was no different,” Healey’s office told The Well News. “We look forward to proceeding with our case and having our day in court to show how Exxon is breaking the law and to put an end to the deception once and for all.” 

Reece can be reached at [email protected] and https://twitter.com/ReeceNWrites


A+
a-
  • Boston
  • climate change
  • ExxonMobil
  • Litigation
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Litigation

    September 18, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Hunter Biden Says IRS Invaded His Privacy After Agents Disclosed His Tax Records

    WASHINGTON — Presidential son Hunter Biden sued the Internal Revenue Service on Monday for what he calls an invasion of... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Presidential son Hunter Biden sued the Internal Revenue Service on Monday for what he calls an invasion of his privacy even as he faces unrelated felony gun charges. Biden’s lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia accuses IRS agents of... Read More

    September 18, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    California Sues Oil and Gas Giants Over Climate Change Claims

    OAKLAND, Calif. — California is suing five of the largest oil and gas companies in the world for allegedly engaging... Read More

    OAKLAND, Calif. — California is suing five of the largest oil and gas companies in the world for allegedly engaging in a decadeslong campaign of deception related to climate change and doing nothing as the state endured the growing problems related to a warming planet. The... Read More

    September 14, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Minnesota Voters Sue to Keep Trump Off Presidential Ballot

    SAINT PAUL, Minn. — Eight Minnesota voters, including a former Minnesota secretary of state, are suing the current occupant of... Read More

    SAINT PAUL, Minn. — Eight Minnesota voters, including a former Minnesota secretary of state, are suing the current occupant of that office in a bid to keep former President Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s ballot in 2024. The lawsuit, which was filed on their... Read More

    September 8, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Appeals Court Revives Psychologists’ Lawsuit After They Were Accused of Helping in Torture

    WASHINGTON — The Washington, D.C., Court of Appeals on Thursday revived a defamation lawsuit by retired military psychologists who claimed... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Washington, D.C., Court of Appeals on Thursday revived a defamation lawsuit by retired military psychologists who claimed they were inaccurately accused of encouraging torture during the U.S. war on terrorism. The ruling also represents a setback for local laws found nationwide intended to... Read More

    August 30, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Giuliani Loses by Default Judgment in Election Workers’ Defamation Lawsuit

    WASHINGTON — Rudy Giuliani was found liable by a federal court in Washington, D.C., Wednesday for defaming two Georgia election... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Rudy Giuliani was found liable by a federal court in Washington, D.C., Wednesday for defaming two Georgia election workers he accused of falsifying ballots to make Donald Trump lose the 2020 presidential election. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell represented a default... Read More

    August 30, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Consumer Group Sues Hyatt Hotels for Undisclosed ‘Resort Fees’

    WASHINGTON — A consumer advocacy group is suing Hyatt Hotels over what the lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C., describes as... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A consumer advocacy group is suing Hyatt Hotels over what the lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C., describes as deceptive fees. The lawsuit invokes the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act, which requires honest dealings, such as businesses selling products and services for their... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top