Loading...

Appeals Court Says Government Can Be Sued Over 2015 Church Massacre

September 1, 2019 by Dan McCue
Appeals Court Says Government Can Be Sued Over 2015 Church Massacre

WASHINGTON — The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated a lawsuit over the flawed background check that allowed an avowed white supremacist to buy the gun he used to kill nine people in a racist attack on a South Carolina church.

Last year, U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel, presiding in Charleston, S.C., dismissed the case, holding the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act grants the government immunity in almost all cases when it fails to prevent the wrongful sale of a firearm.

On Friday, however, a three-judge, 4th Circuit panel said Gergel was mistaken. According to the panel, which sent the case back to the lower court for further consideration, the Brady Act does not shield the federal government from being sued.

Rather, it protects only the actions of individual employees, the panel said. The ruling is the first of its kind on the appellate level.

Dylann Roof was convicted and sentenced to death for carrying out the massacre during at Bible study class at Charleston’s historic Emanuel AME Church.

It was quickly revealed that Roof should never have been able to purchase the .45-caliber Glock pistol he used in the murder due to his arrest, just six weeks earlier, on a felony drug charge.

Roof had gone to a Columbia, S.C. gun store not far from his home to purchase the gun and underwent the mandatory federal background check. When the gun store received no response of denial or approval after three days, an employee exercised his legal right to sell Roof the firearm.

That option after the required three-day wait has become known as the “Charleston loophole.”

In February, House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn, D-S.C., Representative Peter King, R-N.Y., and Representative Joe Cunningham, D-S.C., introduced the Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2019, bipartisan legislation that would permanently close the loophole.

It passed the House days later, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell prevented it from being taken up in the Senate.

“The real tragedy of the Emanuel Massacre is that it could have been prevented,” Clyburn said at the time. “We need to ensure that background checks are completed before weapons are sold. This legislation seeks to provide, with as much certainty as possible, that guns are not sold to those who ought not have them.”  

Cunningham said the legislation would give “law enforcement the time necessary for them to do their job.”

“The tragedy at Mother Emanuel should never have happened, and hopefully by promoting common sense steps like closing the Charleston loophole we can prevent it from ever happening again,” he said.

The lawsuit revived on Friday centers on the actions of the federal background check examiner who failed to discover what happened after Roof’s arrest on the felony drug charge.

The existence of a charge alone is enough for the FBI to deny a firearm purchase. But by law anyone who admits to or is convicted of using or being addicted to a controlled substance is automatically barred from possessing a firearm.

In reviewing the case, the 4th Circuit panel focused on the examiner’s failure to contact the arresting agency to find out what happened in the case. Because the examiner allegedly failed to follow a “clear directive” that he do so, “the Government can claim no immunity in these circumstances,” the panel said.

The court documents also show there was much that wasn’t the examiner’s fault. He did try to get copies of Roof’s arrest report, but it had been forwarded to the FBI with multiple errors, complicating the search.

The search was prolonged further by the FBI’s prohibition on examiners using Google to search for the contact information of the local agency that had the document.

All of these issues were revealed within a month of the murders by then-FBI Director James Comey. He also acknowledged Roof’s gun application would have been denied if the examiner had seen the police report.

Friday’s ruling was written by Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Roger Gregory, and he was joined in the opinion by U.S. Circuit Judge Albert Diaz.

U.S. Circuit Judge G. Steven Agee wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Where Agee disagreed with the majority opinion was its view of examiner’s actions. 

Because court records revealed that Roof had no convictions — he admitted to using controlled substances and was never tried on the drug charge — and the contacted agencies provided no verified information, it was “within the Examiner’s discretion” to move on to other requests, Agee wrote.

“Any attempts to improve the efficiency and efficacy of firearms background checks should be focused on improving examiners’ access to accurate information,” Agee said. “The majority’s approach instead hampers examiners by requiring them to follow up on every potential lead and expend further precious resources.”

In The News

Health

Voting

Litigation

January 31, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Trump Sues Washington Post Editor for Audiobook About His Presidency

PENSACOLA, Fla. — Former President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit Tuesday claiming $50 million in damages because of recordings from... Read More

PENSACOLA, Fla. — Former President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit Tuesday claiming $50 million in damages because of recordings from interviews that Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward released in an audiobook. Trump admits he consented to giving taped interviews to Woodward for his book, “Rage,” but... Read More

January 25, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Justice Dept. Sues Google Again Alleging Monopolistic Ad Tactics

A Justice Department lawsuit filed Tuesday against Google accuses the internet giant of illegally acting like a monopoly with its... Read More

A Justice Department lawsuit filed Tuesday against Google accuses the internet giant of illegally acting like a monopoly with its digital advertising technology. The lawsuit filed in federal court in Virginia seeks a court order to break up Google’s grip on online advertising sales and to... Read More

January 20, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Environmentalists Fire Back Against Oil Industry in Lawsuit over Greenhouse Gas Regulation

WASHINGTON — Environmentalists tried this week to strike down efforts by oil industry supporters who are challenging U.S. government warnings... Read More

WASHINGTON — Environmentalists tried this week to strike down efforts by oil industry supporters who are challenging U.S. government warnings about greenhouse gasses. They filed a brief that urged a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to dismiss a lawsuit by the pro-fossil fuel groups against... Read More

November 21, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Trump to Be Hit With Second Round of Lawsuit by Woman Claiming Rape

WASHINGTON — An advice columnist who accused Donald Trump of raping her before he was president plans to refile her... Read More

WASHINGTON — An advice columnist who accused Donald Trump of raping her before he was president plans to refile her defamation lawsuit against him this week and add a new legal claim. The new claim of battery results from the sexual assault that E. Jean Carroll... Read More

November 18, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
DC Sues Washington Commanders Again Claiming Season Ticket Holders Cheated

WASHINGTON — The District of Columbia’s attorney general sued the Washington Commanders football team Thursday for allegedly keeping refundable deposits... Read More

WASHINGTON — The District of Columbia’s attorney general sued the Washington Commanders football team Thursday for allegedly keeping refundable deposits that were supposed to be returned to season ticket holders. The lawsuit says the team violated Washington, D.C.’s, consumer protection laws. D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine... Read More

November 14, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Trump Argues Documents FBI Seized Were Personal in His Latest Court Battle

MIAMI — Former President Donald Trump is fighting back against FBI allegations he illegally took secret documents from the White... Read More

MIAMI — Former President Donald Trump is fighting back against FBI allegations he illegally took secret documents from the White House that he stored in his home. In a court filing last week that a judge unsealed Monday, Trump says he was acting within his rights... Read More

News From The Well