Lawsuit Claiming Voter Suppression in North Carolina
The Republican supermajority in the North Carolina legislature unlawfully banned early voting on the last Saturday before Election Day to suppress the black and Democratic vote, a lawsuit filed Tuesday claims.
The plaintiffs in the case, the North Carolina Democratic Party, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, note that in the last three presidential elections, more than half of the ballots cast in the state were cast during early voting.
“Although early voting is popular with voters across the state and from all backgrounds, certain groups of voters have embraced early voting with enthusiasm,” the lawsuit says.
Black North Carolinians in particular have cast their ballots during early voting at a higher rate than White North Carolinians. The same has generally held true for voters who are registered Democrats, as compared to non-Democrats, the plaintiffs claim.
“When these trends became apparent, Republican members of the North Carolina General Assembly repeatedly set their sights on reducing and restricting early voting opportunities for North Carolinians, targeting voters who they perceive to hold unfavorable political views,” the lawsuit says.
The plaintiffs allege the most recent attempt to do this was through the rushed passage of Senate Bill 325 in 2018.
The bill not not only outlawed early voting the Saturday before Election Day, but also made it more expensive for counties to operate early voting sites by imposing costly and rigid uniformity mandates on early voting hours and locations.
“Their efforts were so stealthy, in fact, that Republican legislators did not even consult with, let alone obtain the support of, the very county elections boards whose interests the bill’s sponsors claimed to champion,” the lawsuit says.
Although the measure was supposed to go into effect for the 2018 mid-term election, lawmakers backed down in the face of a huge backlash and allowed the election to proceed under the previously existing early voting rules.
However, they did not rescind the new rule and it is currently scheduled to go into effect prior to the 2020 election.
“With control of everything from the White House and Congress to the Governor’s mansion and the General Assembly on the ballot next year, it is vital that every voter can freely and easily make their voice heard,” North Carolina Democratic Party chair Wayne Goodwin said in a written statement. “North Carolina Democrats are committed to lowering hurdles to the ballot box, not erecting new ones, and we will never waver from our commitment to make voting easier and more accessible for North Carolina families.”
The plaintiffs note North Carolina enacted early voting in 1999, when the state was ranked 43rd for voter participation. In 2012, after early voting and a series of other measures steadily expanded access, the state jumped to 11th in the nation.
“Every American’s right to vote is sacred and I am committed to ensuring more people across our country can freely access that right and have their voices heard,” said DCCC Chair Rep. Cheri Bustos. “I am proud to stand up for North Carolinians’ ability to vote early, and I look forward to the day where access to the ballot isn’t treated as a partisan issue, but rather a universal American value.”
The plaintiffs are asking the court to declare the law violates multiple sections of the North Carolina constitution, and to enjoin the legislature from putting it into effect.
“We all have an obligation to ensure Americans can cast their ballot fairly and that it will be counted, and we cannot allow partisan efforts to make it harder to vote,” said DSCC Chair and Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto. “We are committed to protecting the early vote program so that North Carolinians may exercise their rights without unfair obstacles.”
In The News
WASHINGTON - The story is a familiar one if you've been reading or talking about battleground and swing states this election cycle. Thanks to a combination of Donald Trump’s razor-thin wins and Hillary Clinton's narrow losses in 2016, and the changing demographics of state electorates, a... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Speaking before the U.S. Conference of Mayors Wednesday, former New York City mayor and current Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg promised local leaders will always have "a seat at the table" if he is elected president. Particularly when it comes to deciding how and... Read More
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Two years after the U.S. Supreme Court removed legal barriers to sports betting, California voters could be asked in November to join 14 other states in allowing legal wagers on athletic contests, creating a lucrative industry worth billions of dollars and intense competition... Read More
CHICAGO — Since recreational weed went on sale in Illinois three weeks ago, long lines have formed outside dispensaries, stores have established buying limits, and some have run out of product. All that was expected, based on what’s happened as other states legalized cannabis. But there’s... Read More
The U.S. Supreme Court will review a Philadelphia federal judge’s decision last year to block new Trump administration rules that would have let almost any employer deny female workers no-cost birth control coverage by citing religious and moral objections. In an order late Friday, the justices... Read More
RICHMOND, Va — Thousands of mostly white men — many decked out in camouflage and armed with assault-style rifles — packed Richmond’s streets Monday, circling the gun-free Capitol Square, where thousands more waved signs and listened to speeches, all wanting to make one point: They weren’t... Read More