Trump’s Pardons for Jan. 6 Rioters Prompt Warnings About a Precedent

January 21, 2025 by Tom Ramstack
Trump’s Pardons for Jan. 6 Rioters Prompt Warnings About a Precedent
Supporters of President Donald Trump, Kevin Loftus, left and William Sarsfield III, who were convicted for participating in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, talk to reporters after being pardoned and released in the early morning hours from the Philadelphia Federal Detention Center before traveling to Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s sweeping pardons on the first day of his second term for everyone accused of crimes in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol are making his critics wonder whether he is setting a troublesome legal precedent.

Everyone convicted or awaiting trial on charges related to the riot was set free by Trump’s executive order. It covered more than 1,500 people after the largest investigation in Justice Department history.

It included commuting the sentences of 14 of the most extremist members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers militia. Most of them were convicted of seditious conspiracy, along with crimes of violence against police.

A pardon restores all rights to the accused. A commutation ends their criminal sentences but does not restore all rights, such as gun ownership.

Trump said the pardons would end “a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years.”

As Trump continued signing executive orders Tuesday, the number of which is expected to grow to around 100 in the coming days, the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement it is prepared to oppose him with legal action.

“While we know this president will issue orders with real, dire consequences on people here and abroad, many of his declarations do not and cannot change the law but instead are designed to engender chaos and confusion,” the ACLU said.

He issued more executive orders on his first day since Franklin Roosevelt in 1937. In addition to the pardons for Jan. 6 rioters, they covered environmental policy, immigration, the federal workforce and civil rights.

“The president’s actions are an outrageous insult to our justice system and the heroes who suffered physical scars and emotional trauma as they protected the Capitol, the Congress and the Constitution,” former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a post on X. “It is shameful that the president has decided to make one of his top priorities the abandonment and betrayal of police officers who put their lives on the line to stop an attempt to subvert the peaceful transfer of power.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement, “Donald Trump is ushering in a Golden Age for people that break the law and attempt to overthrow the government.”

The National Association of Assistant U.S. Attorneys described Trump’s pardons as part of a potentially dangerous trend.

There is no question about the president’s constitutional authority to grant pardons but “we are concerned it is increasingly becoming abused for political purposes and to usurp the legislative process to affect policy outcomes not enshrined in law,” said Steve Wasserman, president of the Washington, D.C.-based association.

Historically, presidential pardons were granted only in cases of clear injustice. They were granted after being vetted through the Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney.

“Unfortunately, the latest rounds of presidential pardons do not meet this standard,” Wasserman said.

Trump’s supporters said the pardons were an effort at reconciliation for the nation by putting an unfortunate incident in the past.

An attorney for Enrique Tarrio, the former Proud Boys national chairman who was serving a 22-year sentence for seditious conspiracy, said, “This marks a pivotal moment in our client’s life, and it symbolizes a turning point for our nation. We are optimistic for the future, as we now turn the page on this chapter, embracing new possibilities and opportunities.” 

Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, who was among the first Jan. 6 prisoners released, greeted other prisoners as they were released Tuesday from the District of Columbia’s Central Detention Facility.

He continued to insist that he and other persons accused in the Jan. 6 riot were political prisoners rather than being prosecuted for true crimes.

“They’re not going to get a fair trial,” he said. “That’s on the DOJ.”

Rhodes was serving an 18-year sentence for seditious conspiracy.

There were 467 rioters sentenced to periods of incarceration, according to the Justice Department. The last of them who remain in jail are expected to be released by Wednesday.

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and X

A+
a-
  • Donald Trump
  • Jan 6
  • Pardons
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Law

    July 14, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Appeals Court Allows Defense Dept. to Override Sept. 11 Conspirators’ Deal

    WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court’s ruling Friday allows the federal government to set aside a plea bargain that would... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court’s ruling Friday allows the federal government to set aside a plea bargain that would spare conspirators in the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the United States from the death penalty. The plea bargain was reached in August with Khalid Sheikh... Read More

    July 10, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Justice Dept. Whistleblower Program Offers Big Rewards for Antitrust Information 

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Wednesday announced a whistleblower program that would give potentially large rewards to anyone who... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Wednesday announced a whistleblower program that would give potentially large rewards to anyone who reports antitrust crimes. The crimes typically involve organized deception that hurts consumers, taxpayers and free market competition. Whistleblowers who provide the Justice Department with original information... Read More

    July 10, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Federal Judge Certifies Class Action in Birthright Citizenship Case

    CONCORD, N.H. — A federal judge on Thursday barred the Trump administration from ending birthright citizenship, reviving a legal standoff... Read More

    CONCORD, N.H. — A federal judge on Thursday barred the Trump administration from ending birthright citizenship, reviving a legal standoff with the White House just days after the Supreme Court blocked federal judges from using nationwide injunctions to thwart the president's policies. Ruling from the bench... Read More

    July 9, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Pediatricians Sue Kennedy Over ‘Unscientific Changes’ to Vaccine Policy

    WASHINGTON — The American Academy of Pediatrics and a half dozen other major medical groups sued Health Secretary Robert F.... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The American Academy of Pediatrics and a half dozen other major medical groups sued Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday for making “unilateral, unscientific changes to federal vaccine policy” that they contend are an “assault” on science and public health. In a... Read More

    July 8, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Gun Rights Groups Sue to Block National Firearms Act Enforcement

    WASHINGTON — A coalition of Second Amendment advocates is suing to invalidate gun ownership restrictions that were revised by the... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A coalition of Second Amendment advocates is suing to invalidate gun ownership restrictions that were revised by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act President Donald Trump signed July 4. The bill removes many of the National Firearms Act taxes associated with gun ownership. The... Read More

    July 8, 2025
    by Alexa Citrin
    Trump Crackdown on Pro-Palestinian Campus Activists Goes to Trial 

    BOSTON — A trial over the Trump administration’s attempts to deport international students and scholars involved in pro-Palestinian activism on... Read More

    BOSTON — A trial over the Trump administration’s attempts to deport international students and scholars involved in pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses began on Monday with the plaintiffs arguing the efforts threaten to upend free speech rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. “Not since the McCarthy... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top