Trump Wins Court Hold on Hotel Emoluments Suit During Appeal
NEW YORK — A U.S. appeals court extended a temporary hold on subpoenas issued to the Trump Organization and other entities in a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump of illegally profiting from his Washington hotel.
The extension by the federal appeals court in Washington on Thursday all but assures that a pair of Democratic attorneys general won’t get to see the financial information before the presidential election in November.
Trump had asked the court to continue blocking the discovery process from the AGs of Washington, D.C., and Maryland while he seeks to have the case tossed by the U.S. Supreme Court, which hasn’t yet agreed to hear his appeal.
Trump said in recent court filings that he’ll ask the nation’s highest court to reverse a May appellate ruling that revived the lawsuit accusing him of violating the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution by profiting from foreign governments whose employees stayed at the hotel, which Trump developed in a historic U.S. Post Office building not far from the White House.
“This means we will not get discovery before the election in all likelihood — his delay tactics have succeeded,” Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh said in a phone call. “We still intend to get to the truth, but he is likely to be able to keep hiding the information about the post office hotel until after the election.”
Frosh said the subpoenas seek financial information from the Trump Organization as well as competitors and government agencies that have done business with the property — but nothing from Trump personally.
The subpoenas are “very discreet and organized in such a way that the president isn’t inconvenienced in any way,” Frosh said. “The fact that he is fighting this shows how scared he is for this information to come out.”
Neither the U.S. Justice Department nor the Trump Organization immediately returned messages seeking comment.
The two AGs claimed taxpayers they represent were being harmed because the Trump International Hotel has become a magnet for foreign dignitaries, state government officials and lobbyists, drawing business away from competitors in Maryland and D.C. They sought a court order compelling Trump to abide by constitutional restrictions.
In its request for a stay, the government said it was likely to succeed before the Supreme Court and shouldn’t be bothered with the subpoenas in the mean time.
“That intrusive and burdensome discovery into the President’s financial affairs and official actions, including subpoenas to five federal agencies, would require the government to expend substantial resources and impose irreparable harm on the President,” the Justice Department said in the filing.
©2020 Bloomberg News
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON (AP) — Many questions remain unanswered about the failure to prevent the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. But after six congressional hearings, it's clear that the Capitol Police were unprepared and overwhelmed as hundreds of Donald Trump's supporters laid siege to the building.... Read More
WASHINGTON - Thirty years ago today, on March 3, 1991, a Los Angeles motorist named Rodney King was severely beaten by four White police officers wielding metal batons, an event that would ultimately seal his place in recent civil rights history. This morning, the Library of Congress announced... Read More
CHICAGO - A federal judge on Tuesday put off approval of a proposed $92 million class-action settlement by the social media app TikTok, wanting to give attorneys at least 21 days to address his questions about the proposal. U.S. District Judge John Lee gave the attorneys... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — FBI Director Chris Wray is set to testify for the first time since the deadly Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, with lawmakers likely to press him on whether the bureau adequately communicated with other law enforcement agencies about the potential for... Read More
Congress needs to create mandates to curb the abusive power exerted by a handful of online platforms, according to all six witnesses at a Capitol Hill hearing on Thursday. During the hearing, members of a House Judiciary subcommittee grappled with solutions to address the ability of... Read More
Four panelists warned today that proposed legislative reforms for more aggressive antitrust enforcement in Big Tech would likely spill over across all industries, hindering innovation and harming consumers. Strengthening the antitrust laws - federal and state statutes that restrict the formation of monopolies and prohibit dominant... Read More