Prosecutors Select Jury in Bannon Contempt Trial

July 18, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Prosecutors Select Jury in Bannon Contempt Trial
Former White House strategist Steve Bannon departs the federal courthouse, Monday, July 18, 2022, in Washington. Jury selection began Monday in the trial of Bannon, a one-time adviser to former President Donald Trump, who faces criminal contempt of Congress charges after refusing for months to cooperate with the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

WASHINGTON — Prosecutors were promising a quick trial of former Trump administration advisor Steve Bannon after choosing a jury in the case Monday in Washington, D.C.

Bannon is being prosecuted on two counts of contempt of Congress for refusing to testify about his inside knowledge at the White House of decisions leading to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Justice Department prosecutors said they plan to call only a few witnesses, mostly from the House select committee that subpoenaed him. The trial is not expected to last beyond this week.

Defense and prosecuting attorneys avoided questions to potential jury members about their feelings on Bannon and former President Donald Trump. They focused instead on how much news the potential jurors had seen or read about the Jan. 6 attack and the congressional investigation.

Bannon’s attorneys argued unsuccessfully for a delay of the trial until at least mid-October because of pre-trial publicity. U.S. District Court Judge Carl Nichols denied the request, saying he doubted the publicity would make it impossible to find an unbiased jury.

Everyone in the jury pool of 22 people acknowledged knowing about the case. Many said they watched at least part of the televised congressional hearings.

Their knowledge of the situation is not enough to get them removed from the jury pool under the court’s procedural rules, unless they express strong opinions.

One who was removed was a man who said he watched the congressional hearings. He then turned toward Bannon as he said, “I do believe he’s guilty.”

Jurors who made the final cut of 12 persons included a State Department employee, a health care worker, a legal aid worker and a retired woman who had been employed by a union. They said they had not formed an opinion on Bannon’s guilt or innocence.

Bannon sat mostly quiet, wearing a mask, with his hands clasped during jury selection. As he walked into court, he waved to the media and said, “Thanks for showing up.”

Before the trial, Bannon pledged he would make it the “misdemeanor from hell for [Attorney General] Merrick Garland, [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi, [D-Calif.], and [President] Joe Biden.”

More recently, he offered to testify to the House select committee in an attempt to avoid trial. The judge said regardless of whether Bannon changed his mind, he already was charged with criminal contempt.

He faces at least 30 days in jail on each of the two counts and as much as one year on each count if he is convicted.

So far, Nichols has generally favored most of the motions from the prosecution, perhaps indicating the Justice Department has a strong case.

Bannon is one of several Trump administration members who have tried to avoid the congressional subpoenas by invoking “executive privilege.” The executive privilege gives the president and his staff an immunity from prosecution and congressional inquiry for their official actions.

Last week, the Justice Department filed a pleading in a separate case against former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows that addresses the executive privilege defense.

The Justice Department agreed White House staff members could claim immunity from prosecution in most cases but not while Congress is investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

“The select committee has demonstrated that such information is critical to its investigation,” the Justice Department attorneys wrote.

Their filing was a response to a lawsuit filed by Meadows to block a subpoena against him. Meadows says he should be granted an “absolute immunity.”

The Justice Department argues for a “qualified immunity” after staff members leave the White House. In other words, they are immune from prosecution and congressional review unless Congress can show a need for their information.

The dispute presents a novel situation for the courts. The House select committee acknowledges that never in American history has there been such strong evidence of a coup by a sitting president.

The committee has another prime-time television hearing planned for Thursday evening. Committee members said they would show Trump’s “dereliction of duties.”

Tom can be reached at [email protected] and @TomRamstack

A+
a-
  • Contempt of Congress
  • jury selection
  • Steve Bannon
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Law

    March 27, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Congressional Republicans Seek Legislation to Limit Judges’ Nationwide Injunctions

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. House is scheduled to vote next week on a bill that would limit the authority of... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. House is scheduled to vote next week on a bill that would limit the authority of federal courts to issue nationwide injunctions against Trump administration policy actions. The bill, introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., is another sign of the growing conflict... Read More

    March 26, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    US Attorney’s Plan to Protect Police Draws Warnings About Rights Violations

    WASHINGTON — The interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia said this week he no longer plans to turn... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia said this week he no longer plans to turn over potentially discrediting information about police officers to judges or defense attorneys before the officers testify at criminal trials. The announcement is raising questions about whether... Read More

    March 25, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Trump’s Directive Against Law Firms Creates Concern of War With Lawyers

    WASHINGTON — A new presidential memorandum is raising questions from members of the legal community about whether Donald Trump is... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A new presidential memorandum is raising questions from members of the legal community about whether Donald Trump is trying to wage war with law firms that challenge his policies. The memo tells the Justice and Homeland Security Departments to “seek sanctions against attorneys and... Read More

    March 20, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Federal Judge Blocks DOGE’s Access to Social Security Data

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge in Maryland on Thursday temporarily barred the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing the personal... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge in Maryland on Thursday temporarily barred the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing the personal data of millions of Americans currently held in the secure hands of the Social Security Administration. The ruling by U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander — all... Read More

    March 20, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    New York’s Top Court Nixes Bid for Noncitizen Voting in NYC

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York state’s highest court on Thursday ended an effort by the New York City Council to... Read More

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York state’s highest court on Thursday ended an effort by the New York City Council to allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections. Though the local law never went into effect, the Democrat-led city council heralded its passage in December 2021, calling... Read More

    Trump's Bluntness Powered a White House Comeback. Now His Words Are Getting Him in Trouble in Court

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump’s shoot-from-the-lip style kept Americans on the edge of their seats during last year's campaign. But now that... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump’s shoot-from-the-lip style kept Americans on the edge of their seats during last year's campaign. But now that he's speaking as a president and not as a candidate, his words are being used against him in court in the blizzard of litigation challenging his agenda.... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top