Maryland City’s Female Toplessness Ban Survives in Court Ruling … For Now
Ocean City, Maryland, can continue to enforce its ban on topless women at its popular beach, a federal judge ruled last week.
There’s a fundamental difference between topless women and topless men that is supported by case law and tradition, Judge James Bredar wrote in his ruling.
“The Court finds that protecting the public sensibilities from the public display of areas of the body traditionally viewed as erogenous zones — including female, but not male, breasts — is an important government objective,” Bredar wrote.
Five women who sued the city in 2018 said they should have the same right to toplessness as men.
They were motivated by an ordinance Ocean City officials passed in 2017 that banned public displays of specific body parts, namely male and female genitals and female breasts.
The dispute started when “Topfreedom” advocate Chelsea Eline asked city officials to instruct the beach patrol not to confront bare-chested women so they could sunbathe. Eline said she planned to go topless at the Ocean City beach.
Beach patrol leaders largely agreed with Eline’s request. They put out a memo to employees telling them not to “approach the topless women,” even if other beach-goers complained.
Some women interpreted the memo as an endorsement of toplessness. It also touched off a community debate that led to the emergency ordinance followed by the lawsuit.
The women plaintiffs argued the ban violates the Constitution’s Equal Protection clause, which is supposed to guarantee gender equality.
Ocean City officials argued their female toplessness ban protected their image as a family-friendly resort town. Their ordinance said female breasts in public were “still seen by society as unpalatable.”
Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh advised Ocean City officials that their ban did not violate state or federal law.
Bredar largely agreed with the state attorney general in his federal court ruling. It said the ban is rationally related to protecting the public interest. He also said unequal treatment of male and female toplessness is supported by Supreme Court precedent.
The Supreme Court has decided that physical differences between men and women provide a valid basis for laws like Ocean City’s ban.
However, Bredar acknowledged that his ruling, as well as the Supreme Court precedent, might not stand the test of time.
“This Court questions whether laws which distinguish between men and women based on ‘public sensibilities’ can survive indefinitely,” Bredar’s opinion says. “Such amorphous concepts are vulnerable to prejudice and stereotypes grounded more in fear than in reality.”
For now, he said his only option was to follow Supreme Court guidance.
“Whether or not society should differentiate between male and female breasts is a separate inquiry from whether it is constitutional to do so,” Bredar wrote.
The laws in other states also are unsettled.
New Hampshire has an anti-toplessness law that was challenged by three women who were fined for exposing their breasts in public. In January, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
Fort Collins, Colorado, passed an ordinance banning female toplessness that also was challenged in a lawsuit. The Tenth Circuit federal appeals court in Colorado blocked enforcement of the ordinance last September by saying it unconstitutionally discriminates against women.
The ruling effectively gave women a right to go topless anywhere it is allowed for men within the jurisdiction of the Tenth Circuit, which includes Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming.
In The News
WASHINGTON (AP) — Many questions remain unanswered about the failure to prevent the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. But after six congressional hearings, it's clear that the Capitol Police were unprepared and overwhelmed as hundreds of Donald Trump's supporters laid siege to the building.... Read More
WASHINGTON - Thirty years ago today, on March 3, 1991, a Los Angeles motorist named Rodney King was severely beaten by four White police officers wielding metal batons, an event that would ultimately seal his place in recent civil rights history. This morning, the Library of Congress announced... Read More
CHICAGO - A federal judge on Tuesday put off approval of a proposed $92 million class-action settlement by the social media app TikTok, wanting to give attorneys at least 21 days to address his questions about the proposal. U.S. District Judge John Lee gave the attorneys... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — FBI Director Chris Wray is set to testify for the first time since the deadly Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, with lawmakers likely to press him on whether the bureau adequately communicated with other law enforcement agencies about the potential for... Read More
Congress needs to create mandates to curb the abusive power exerted by a handful of online platforms, according to all six witnesses at a Capitol Hill hearing on Thursday. During the hearing, members of a House Judiciary subcommittee grappled with solutions to address the ability of... Read More
Four panelists warned today that proposed legislative reforms for more aggressive antitrust enforcement in Big Tech would likely spill over across all industries, hindering innovation and harming consumers. Strengthening the antitrust laws - federal and state statutes that restrict the formation of monopolies and prohibit dominant... Read More