facebook linkedin twitter

Federalist Society Event Focuses on Competition and Antitrust Issues

September 10, 2021 by Victoria Turner
Lina Khan of the Federal Trade Commission. (Graeme Jennings/Pool Washington via AP, Pool)

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden’s controversial executive order on competition was the topic being discussed at a Federalist Society event held Thursday. 

The July 9 Executive Order 14036 entitled, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” seeks to address competition issues and reform the antitrust laws governing them. Any actual change to the antitrust laws will take years, an antitrust attorney told the Well News, and that is if there is any eventual bipartisan support. 

But Neil Averitt, a former Federal Trade Commission lawyer, identified six areas of likely and useful action at the debate on whether the order advances or restricts competition. These ultimate benefits, he added, make the order “sound and fundamentally [deserving of] support.” Nevertheless, critics of the order claimed it sought to favor party objectives and ignore its long-term effects. 

The order focuses on health care and online platforms and urges agencies to adopt progressive policies but doesn’t include any enforcement mechanism. It includes 72 provisions that could result in more than a dozen federal agencies looking into rulemaking to foster competition and consumer protection. For example, it asks the Department of Health and Human Services to look into mapping out how to lower drug prices and make health care affordable. 

Out of the 72 initiatives, the now-columnist at FTC:WATCH pointed to six likely areas where “useful action” was likely: 

  • Removing barriers created by the government for new entrants to markets like state and federal occupational and product licensing; 
  • Addressing anti competitive provisions like non-compete clauses or no-poach agreements between competitors in the labor market; 
  • Fostering government competition in present industries;
  • Protecting consumers from fine print provisions like high cell phone termination fees or “drip pricing” – the final prices revealed by industries like airlines and hotels;
  • “Difficult and contentious” areas like merger guidelines and technical standards; 
  • Shifting the burden of proof to the merging parties in merger cases that have empirical data showing it would result in an anticompetitive merger. 

But Howard Beales III, professor at George Washington University’s School of Business, thinks the order is “schizophrenic about competition, it uses competition as an excuse to replace competitive outcomes and it delivers favors to interest groups.” 

Antitrust laws, Beales said, should be an “economic concept” not a vehicle for “fundamentally political decisions.”

“The executive order seems to be ignoring the important long-term benefits of patents,” he said. 

Robert Bork, Jr., president of the Antitrust Education Project, agreed that the recommendations within the order “are essentially payoffs, picking winners and losers… [an] infusion of social policy regulation that will be part of this effort from labor to climate change to equity.” 

Bork sees antitrust laws beginning and ending with the consumer welfare standard – the economic model employed by antitrust enforcers that finds a merger anti-competitive if it increases prices above competitive market levels or decreases product quality. Critics of the order say it targets that standard. 

Issues of competition in the labor market, however, are missed by the consumer welfare standard, argued Ioana Marinescu, associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania. The majority of labor markets, she claimed, are highly concentrated, thus tending to result in lower wages when there are non-compete clauses that prevent employees from working for a competitor or no-poach agreements between competitors stopping them from hiring each other’s workforce.

Incorporating labor market issues into the merger guidelines for further enforcement, for example, would help the issues plaguing the market, Marienescu suggested. 

As an economist, she said, “it’s more meaningful to focus on protecting competition rather than consumer welfare.” This is particularly important for the labor market, as the adverse effect of a merger on wages “doesn’t necessarily have a direct effect on consumers in the market.” 

The fact that the White House has appointed its own regulatory advisor on competition and the progressive appointment of FTC Chair Lina Khan, the attorney added, points out the increased scrutiny most deals should expect to receive.

Khan’s notoriety in the antitrust realm skyrocketed in 2017 when she authored the paper entitled, “The Amazon Paradox,” which broke down the failure of antitrust doctrine in regulating the big tech giant that now dominates across markets. 

Antitrust

September 10, 2021
by Victoria Turner
Federalist Society Event Focuses on Competition and Antitrust Issues

WASHINGTON -- President Joe Biden’s controversial executive order on competition was the topic being discussed at a Federalist Society event... Read More

WASHINGTON -- President Joe Biden’s controversial executive order on competition was the topic being discussed at a Federalist Society event held Thursday.  The July 9 Executive Order 14036 entitled, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” seeks to address competition issues and reform the antitrust laws governing... Read More

July 28, 2021
by Dan McCue
States to Fight Dismissal of Antitrust Lawsuit Against Facebook

WASHINGTON -- Attorneys general from 45 states, the District of Columbia and Guam served notice on Wednesday that they are... Read More

WASHINGTON -- Attorneys general from 45 states, the District of Columbia and Guam served notice on Wednesday that they are appealing a federal judge’s decision to throw out their antitrust lawsuit against Facebook. “We filed this notice of appeal because we disagree with the court’s decision... Read More

July 26, 2021
by Dan McCue
Judge Grants FTC More Time to File Amended Complaint Against Facebook

WASHINGTON - A federal judge on Friday gave the U.S. Federal Trade Commission until Aug. 19 to file an amended... Read More

WASHINGTON - A federal judge on Friday gave the U.S. Federal Trade Commission until Aug. 19 to file an amended complaint in its antitrust lawsuit against Facebook. In a filing with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the agency asked for a three-week... Read More

July 20, 2021
by Dan McCue
Biden Picks Jonathan Kanter for Assistant AG for Antitrust

WASHINGTON - President Joe Biden on Tuesday nominated Jonathan Kanter to serve as assistant attorney general for the Antitrust Division... Read More

WASHINGTON - President Joe Biden on Tuesday nominated Jonathan Kanter to serve as assistant attorney general for the Antitrust Division at the Department of Justice. Kanter is a distinguished antitrust lawyer with over 20 years of experience, the White House said in a written statement. He... Read More

Attorneys General Sue Google For Anticompetitive Practices

Attorneys general from 36 states and Washington, D.C., hit Google LLC with yet another antitrust lawsuit Wednesday, accusing the company... Read More

Attorneys general from 36 states and Washington, D.C., hit Google LLC with yet another antitrust lawsuit Wednesday, accusing the company of unfair business tactics to monopolize sales of apps used on Android phones.  The lawsuit says Google bought off competitors and requires restrictive contracts that leave... Read More

From Biden to Congress, Big Tech is Under Mounting Pressure

WASHINGTON (AP) — Without speaking a word or scratching a pen across paper, President Joe Biden drove up the pressure... Read More

WASHINGTON (AP) — Without speaking a word or scratching a pen across paper, President Joe Biden drove up the pressure on Big Tech companies already smarting under federal and congressional investigations, epic antitrust lawsuits and near-constant condemnation from politicians of both parties. Biden last week elevated... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top