9th Circuit Rules Trump Can’t Divert Pentagon Funds to Build Wall
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally divert Pentagon funds to build a miles-long wall on the U.S. border with Mexico, a federal appeals court ruled Friday afternoon.
In a 2-1 ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the transfer of $2.5 billion from the Defense Department circumvented Congress’ constitutional power to appropriate money.
The court also rejected a claim from the government that both the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition lacked the standing to pursue the lawsuit.
Writing for the majority, Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas said succinctly that “the Executive Branch lacked independent constitutional authority to authorize the transfer of funds.
“The panel noted that the Appropriations Clause of the U.S. Constitution exclusively grants the power of the purse to Congress. The panel held that the transfer of funds violated the Appropriations Clause, and, therefore, was unlawful,” Thomas wrote.
“These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to ‘drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause.’ Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful,” he said.
He was joined in the ruling by U.S. Circuit Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw.
U.S. Circuit Judge Daniel Collins, a Trump appointee to the bench, dissented from his colleagues, writing that while he agreed that the Sierra Club had established standing, in his view the organizations lacked any cause of action to challenge the transfers, and concluded that the transfers were lawful.
“This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities,” said Dror Ladin, staff attorney with the ACLU’s National Security Project, and one of the lawyers who argued the case in front of the 9th Circuit.
“President Trump’s xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There’s no undoing the damage that’s been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall,” Ladin said.
Trump sought to transfer the money to the border wall project through a national emergency declaration he signed last year. Trump extended that declaration in February.
The president made construction of the border wall a key part of his 2016 campaign for the White House. At the time he claimed he was going to build the wall to keep out illegal immigrants and drugs “and Mexico is going to pay for it.”
Since assuming office, however, his administration has been beset by legal and political challenges related to the project. Still, the president has remained unbowed.
Just last week, Trump made a trip to the border to celebrate the completion of 200 miles of the new wall.
“My administration has done more than any administration in history to secure our southern border. Our border has never been more secure,” he told officials.
He also vowed to build an additional 450 miles by the end of the year.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court intervened in the case, voting 5-4 and along ideological lines, to allow Trump to continue to use the Defense Department funds while the administration appealed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam, Jr., in which the judge found the administration failed to prove the money was needed for “unforeseen military requirements.”
The 9th Circuit panel agreed, noting that the problems Trump was claiming to address with the funds were not unanticipated or unexpected.
Among those applauding the 9th Circuit decision Friday was House speaker Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who said, “on a bipartisan basis, Congress has repeatedly refused to fund the President’s ineffective, wasteful border wall.
“The rulings by the Ninth Circuit are a great victory for the rule of law and our Constitution,” she continued. “These decisions uphold our Founders’ vision for our democracy: three co-equal branches of government with an Executive branch that is subject to the laws passed by Congress.
“President Trump’s ongoing attempts to undermine military readiness by stealing critical defense funding to pay for his wall is reckless and endangers the American people,” Pelosi added. “The funds that he is pilfering, which were appropriated by Congress, are vital to support the safety and well-being of the brave men and women in uniform, as well as their families. We will never allow our national security and the strength of our military families to suffer so that the President can fulfill an outrageous campaign promise.
“Congress, not the President, has the power of the purse – a power that the Circuit Court’s decisions strongly uphold,” the Speaker said.
Also weighing in was California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, whose state is the site of a portion of the wall.
“Today, the court reminded the president — once again — that no one is above the law,” Becerra said. “
In The News
WASHINGTON -- An FBI search of the Washington, D.C. home of a Russian oligarch this week is moving the Justice... Read More
WASHINGTON -- An FBI search of the Washington, D.C. home of a Russian oligarch this week is moving the Justice Department into the political minefield that comes from mixing foreign policy with legal enforcement. The FBI conducted what it called "law enforcement activity" at the home... Read More
WASHINGTON — Nine-term Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of lying to... Read More
WASHINGTON — Nine-term Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of lying to the FBI and concealing information from federal agents investigating campaign contributions illegally made to him by a Nigerian billionaire. The indictment stems from an FBI investigation... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Guns are again playing a big role in the courts and politics of Washington, D.C. after a champion... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Guns are again playing a big role in the courts and politics of Washington, D.C. after a champion of Second Amendment rights filed a new federal lawsuit to challenge a local law that seeks to restrict some firearms. This time, Dick A. Heller is... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Three American University students are appealing a ruling that dismissed their lawsuit demanding tuition refunds after the COVID-19... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Three American University students are appealing a ruling that dismissed their lawsuit demanding tuition refunds after the COVID-19 pandemic compelled a transition to online learning. They argue the university breached a contract and received unjust enrichment after they paid tens of thousands of dollars... Read More
Just days after a preliminary injunction allowed health care providers to resume performing abortions, a three-judge panel of the U.S.... Read More
Just days after a preliminary injunction allowed health care providers to resume performing abortions, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit temporarily restored a Texas law banning the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy. The ruling came two short days... Read More
MIAMI, Fla. - Three individuals and two companies have been permanently enjoined from operating an international mail fraud scheme offering... Read More
MIAMI, Fla. - Three individuals and two companies have been permanently enjoined from operating an international mail fraud scheme offering unwary consumers psychic, clairvoyant or astrological services, the Justice Department said on Friday. Robert Lhez, Mireille Dayer and Julie Poulleau, all residents of France, are alleged... Read More