Kavanaugh’s Accuser Will Speak to Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday Under Tentative Agreement
September 22, 2018
WASHINGTON — Christine Blasey Ford, the California woman who alleges Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school, is willing to “provide her firsthand knowledge” to the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, her attorneys said Saturday, and the committee has tentatively agreed to hold a hearing on Thursday.
Lawyers for Ford, a research psychologist at Palo Alto University, said they want another meeting with committee staffers to negotiate her appearance, however, meaning a resolution to the politically sensitive standoff is not yet certain.
In an email to the committee, Ford’s lawyers said they are “disappointed with the leaks and the bullying that have tainted the process” since Ford’s name and allegations first surfaced last weekend, abruptly putting Kavanaugh’s nomination into jeopardy.
The Senate committee tentatively agreed to let Ford testify on Thursday, the Associated Press reported late Saturday, although it’s not clear if Kavanaugh will face off against his accuser, or who will conduct the questioning. Representatives of the committee will speak to Ford’s lawyers on Sunday to continue hammering out details.
Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, the committee chairman, has not spoken publicly and may yet decide to move forward with a committee vote on Kavanaugh on Monday, as he had wanted, or postpone a vote to accommodate Ford’s requests.
Other Republicans on the committee expressed frustration at the latest communication, with some dismissing it as a delaying tactic for partisan purposes less than two months before the midterm election.
“This is exactly where we were on Monday morning — without agreeing to a date, time, and terms we are no closer to hearing from Dr Ford then we were when her lawyers said Dr. Ford was willing to testify during their media tour,” Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, tweeted Saturday.
Ford’s allegation that an inebriated Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed and attempted to remove her clothing while muffling her cries at a party in the early 1980s, when both were students at elite private high schools near Washington, D.C., has roiled Kavanaugh’s expected confirmation.
President Donald Trump weighed in Friday, saying “if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents.”
In response, tens of thousands of Americans began using the hashtag #whyIdidntreport to describe their own experience with assault.
Kavanaugh has vigorously denied Ford’s accusation. In a statement Saturday, White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said the nominee is “ready, willing and eager to testify as soon as possible.”
Republican leaders need to tread softly as they work to get Kavanaugh onto the Supreme Court with a slim 51-seat majority in the Senate. His confirmation could shift the ideological makeup of the nation’s highest court for decades.
Several Senate Republicans have indicated they are anxious to hear from Ford and then move forward with the process, fearful that repeated delays will prevent Kavanaugh from assuming the bench.
But a handful of Republican senators considered the likeliest to join Democrats in voting against Kavanaugh have stressed that they aren’t comfortable moving ahead without hearing directly from Ford. They will be closely watching how the Judiciary Committee treats her.
Grassley has agreed to Ford’s requests to allow just one TV camera to be in the hearing room and to limit news media access, to provide breaks during the testimony, and to keep Kavanaugh out of the room while Ford testifies.
But he balked at her requests that Kavanaugh testify first, that only senators — and not committee attorneys — ask questions, and that subpoenas be issued to compel other potential witnesses to testify.
Democrats on the committee have joined Ford in pushing for those stipulations, saying that senators have a responsibility to ask the questions, and accusing Republicans of not taking the accusation seriously by rushing the hearing.
Republicans hope to avoid a repeat of the divisive confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas in 1991, and the politically awkward optics of a panel of men questioning a female victim of sexual misconduct in the #MeToo era. They have pushed for staff or outside counsel to ask Ford and Kavanaugh questions.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the highest-ranking Democrat on the committee, accused Republicans of bullying Ford and said there were unpleasant echoes of how Thomas’ accuser, Anita Hill, was treated before Thomas was confirmed.
“It’s clear that Republicans have learned nothing over the last 27 years,” Feinstein said Friday. “Bullying a survivor of attempted rape in order to confirm a nominee — particularly at a time when she’s receiving death threats — is an extreme abuse of power.”
Ford first contacted Feinstein in a letter in July, seeking confidentiality. After Ford’s name and her allegations became public last weekend, Feinstein has been criticized by Republicans and her general election opponent, state Sen. Kevin de Leon, for not sharing her information before Kavanaugh had undergone his confirmation hearings.
Spokesmen for Grassley and Feinstein did not return requests for comment Saturday.
After a week of mostly silence from Ford’s attorneys, Grassley initially set a 5 p.m. Friday deadline for Ford to make a decision on whether to appear Wednesday, but then postponed that to 10 p.m., adding that if she did not reply the committee would go forward with a hearing Monday without her and vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination.
Ford’s attorneys asked late Friday evening for an extra day to consult with their client, saying the Republicans’ deadline was “aggressive and artificial.”
Grassley said Friday he would give Ford additional time to make a decision, but signaled his patience was running thin. “Dr Ford if u changed ur mind say so so we can move on I want to hear ur testimony. Come to us or we to u,” Grassley tweeted.
In a separate development, a top aide leading the Republican response on the Judiciary Committee abruptly resigned late Friday over a separate allegation of sexual harassment.
NBC News reported Saturday that Garrett Ventry resigned after the network questioned a claim made against him when he was employed by the North Carolina General Assembly. Ventry has denied any wrongdoing.
©2018 Los Angeles Times
Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide an issue that could have a profound effect on the outcome of the 2020 election -- whether members of the Electoral College can defy their state's choice for president and cast a vote for someone else.... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court signaled Tuesday that the government may have overreached when it prosecuted two ex-New Jersey officials for their involvement in the "Bridgegate" scandal. For those who don't remember, Bridgegate, also known as the George Washington Bridge lane closure scandal, stemmed from the... Read More
MINNEAPOLIS — The Minnesota Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a voter challenge to a law that allowed the state Republican Party to list only President Donald Trump on GOP primary ballots. In a case that threatened to disrupt next week’s early primary voting, the justices upheld... Read More
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has some supreme news: she’s cancer free. The long-serving liberal lion of the Supreme Court — whose health travails keep plenty of progressives up at night — told CNN in an interview published Wednesday that she’s rid of cancer on her pancreas... Read More
WASHINGTON - Chief Justice John Roberts issued his year-end report on the judiciary last week, coming closer than ever to publicly commenting on the partisan divide that has gripped the federal government. "Each generation has an obligation to pass on to the next, not only a... Read More
WASHINGTON — More than 200 lawmakers, mostly Republicans, filed an amicus brief Thursday urging the Supreme Court to upend the precedents set by two landmark abortion rights cases, elevating abortion as a campaign issue ahead of this fall’s elections. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear... Read More