Justice Dept. Appeals Court Judgment That Blocked Trump’s Law Firm Sanctions

July 2, 2025 by Tom Ramstack
Justice Dept. Appeals Court Judgment That Blocked Trump’s Law Firm Sanctions
Outside the Perkins Coie law firm. (Eric Tucker, Associated Press)

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department this week appealed a court judgment that blocked sanctions against the law firm of Perkins Coie in what appears to be a resumption of President Donald Trump’s reprisals against lawyers who oppose his policies.

The Justice Department has argued that Perkins Coie represents a national security risk and should be banned from federal buildings and contracts.

The Justice Department’s notice of appeal is filed in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The law firm represented the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee in 2016 during Trump’s first run for the presidency.

Perkins Coie argued successfully earlier this year that Trump’s executive order imposing sanctions was retaliatory rather than representing well-reasoned government policy.

On May 2, U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell issued an injunction to block the executive order against Perkins Coie. She said the order violated clients’ constitutional rights to choose their own attorneys and the law firm’s due process guarantees.

She said the order was “an unprecedented attack” on the “foundational principles” of the American judicial system. She also said the order “casts a chilling harm of blizzard proportions across the entire legal profession.”

The Justice Department’s appeal of the Perkins Coie judgment is the first involving an executive order against a law firm to reach an appellate court. The next step would be the U.S. Supreme Court, which has generally favored Trump’s authority with executive orders.

Nine of the 13 law firms hit by the president’s executive orders have succumbed to the pressure by agreeing to perform $940 million in pro bono services for conservative causes in exchange for having sanctions against them lifted.

They said the severity of the sanctions could shut down their law firms.

In addition to ending their government contracts and banning them from federal courthouses and other buildings, the firms’ attorneys would lose their security clearances, meaning government contractors who are their clients would be forced to cease doing business with them.

Perkins Coie was one of four top tier law firms that sued to block the executive orders. The others are Susman Godfrey, WilmerHale and Jenner & Block. All of them have won injunctions to halt enforcement of the executive orders against them.

They were joined by the American Bar Association in suing the Trump administration. 

The American Bar Association’s lawsuit says the president has “used the vast powers of the Executive Branch to coerce lawyers and law firms to abandon clients, causes and policy positions the president does not like,” in violation of the First Amendment.

Seattle-based Perkins Coie was the firm that created the biggest problems for Trump.

While it represented the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie hired a research firm that produced a report saying the Russian government was helping Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. It was followed by FBI and congressional investigations that were inconclusive.

Perkins Coie also responded to Trump campaign lawsuits that sought to overturn Joe Biden’s win of the 2020 presidential election. Of the 65 cases the law firm handled, it won 64 of them.

The executive order Trump signed in March accused Perkins Coie of “dishonest and dangerous activity” while also naming its work for Clinton. It said the firm engaged in racial discrimination with its diversity, equity and inclusion program.

Perkins Coie responded to the Justice Department’s notice of appeal by saying it would continue its court battle against Trump’s executive orders that “violate core constitutional freedoms.”

“We look forward to presenting our case to the D.C. Circuit and remain committed to ensuring that the unconstitutional executive order targeting our firm is never enforced,” a statement from the law firm said.

The original case was Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice et al. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and Twitter

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Justice

July 10, 2025
by Tom Ramstack
Justice Dept. Whistleblower Program Offers Big Rewards for Antitrust Information 

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Wednesday announced a whistleblower program that would give potentially large rewards to anyone who... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Wednesday announced a whistleblower program that would give potentially large rewards to anyone who reports antitrust crimes. The crimes typically involve organized deception that hurts consumers, taxpayers and free market competition. Whistleblowers who provide the Justice Department with original information... Read More

July 7, 2025
by Tom Ramstack
FBI Report on Sex Trafficker Prompts Elon Musk to Accuse Trump of Cover-Up

WASHINGTON — A new FBI report on the 2019 jailhouse death of financier and convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein has... Read More

WASHINGTON — A new FBI report on the 2019 jailhouse death of financier and convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein has reignited a feud between President Donald Trump and his former billionaire ally Elon Musk. The FBI concluded that Epstein committed suicide in jail, despite conspiracy theorists... Read More

July 2, 2025
by Tom Ramstack
Justice Dept. Appeals Court Judgment That Blocked Trump’s Law Firm Sanctions

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department this week appealed a court judgment that blocked sanctions against the law firm of Perkins... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department this week appealed a court judgment that blocked sanctions against the law firm of Perkins Coie in what appears to be a resumption of President Donald Trump's reprisals against lawyers who oppose his policies. The Justice Department has argued that Perkins... Read More

June 30, 2025
by Tom Ramstack
FBI Data Security Breach in Mexico Led to Murders of Drug Informants

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department is being accused of a security breach that allowed a notorious Mexican drug gang to... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department is being accused of a security breach that allowed a notorious Mexican drug gang to track down and to kill FBI informants. An auditor’s report released last week says the Sinaloa drug cartel hired a hacker in 2018 who tapped into... Read More

June 11, 2025
by Tom Ramstack
Justice Dept. Resumes Bribery Prosecutions of Foreign Business That Hurts US Interests

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department plans to resume prosecuting cases under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act but with a different... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department plans to resume prosecuting cases under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act but with a different strategy than before President Donald Trump was elected. The federal law authorizes criminal and civil prosecution of anyone who tries to bribe foreign government officials to... Read More

May 30, 2025
by Dan McCue
Bondi Says Lawyer’s Group Too Biased to Vet Trump Judicial Picks

WASHINGTON — U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday told the American Bar Association that the president’s judicial nominees will... Read More

WASHINGTON — U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday told the American Bar Association that the president’s judicial nominees will no longer sit for interviews with nor respond to questionnaires from the organization. For years, the bar association, which describes itself as the largest voluntary association... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top