Jill Stein Wants a Federal Court to Block Philadelphia’s Voting Machines
PHILADELPHIA — Jill Stein asked a federal court Tuesday to bar Philadelphia’s new voting machines from being used, saying Pennsylvania should never have approved the machines and is breaking the terms of a settlement she reached late last year with the Pennsylvania Department of State.
That agreement, which ended the Green Party candidate’s 2016 election recount lawsuit, requires the department to only certify machines that use voter-verifiable paper ballots that can be audited after an election. Prior to the settlement, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf last year ordered every county to buy new voting machines that leave such a paper trail behind.
But the new system used in Philadelphia and other counties, the ExpressVote XL from vendor Election Systems & Software (ES&S), is insecure and violates that agreement, Stein said.
In the motion filed Tuesday, Stein and Pennsylvania voters who joined in her lawsuit asked the federal court in Philadelphia to order the Department of State to immediately decertify the ExpressVote XL and block it from being recertified.
Stein mounted a third-party presidential campaign in 2016, one that many Democrats blame for taking votes from Hillary Clinton and swinging the election to Donald Trump.
“Pennsylvania officials have insisted on ramming these machines through in a secretive, heavy-handed process,” Stein said in a statement. “They’ve left us no other option but to ask the court to enforce our settlement agreement to ensure that Pennsylvania voters have a voting system they can trust in time for the 2020 elections.”
The Pennsylvania Department of State declined to comment. If Stein is successful, counties in the state would be prohibited from using the machines, and those who already have them would be forced to buy new ones before the 2020 election.
Stein’s motion argued that the new machines don’t produce true paper ballots that can be verified by voters, that election results are determined based on printed bar codes that voters cannot read, and that the machines are insecure and could allow ballots to be modified after submission.
Taken together, Stein said, those issues make it impossible for voters to verify their selections are recorded and counted properly. And it also makes it impossible to audit and confirm the results of any election conducted on the machines.
A spokesperson for ES&S said the system “has been through hundreds of thousands of hours of testing,” and noted that it was certified first by the federal Election Assistance Commission and then twice by the Pennsylvania Department of State.
“They put the ExpressVote XL through extensive testing not just once, but twice,” spokesperson Katina Granger said in an email. “By all accounts, it meets and exceeds the highest standards for security, accuracy and accessibility.”
Philadelphia used the new machines in local election this month, at a cost of $29 million. Northampton County also used the new system this month, and Cumberland County plans to use it next year. Other counties have not yet chosen their machines.
©2019 The Philadelphia Inquirer
Visit The Philadelphia Inquirer at www.inquirer.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON - The story is a familiar one if you've been reading or talking about battleground and swing states this election cycle. Thanks to a combination of Donald Trump’s razor-thin wins and Hillary Clinton's narrow losses in 2016, and the changing demographics of state electorates, a... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Blue Dog Coalition of House Democrats has endorsed H.R. 4990, the Election Technology Research Act of 2019, a bipartisan bill that will give the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Science Foundation new resources to enhance the security of U.S.... Read More
National political parties are targeting a handful of competitive state legislative chambers this year, where the majority parties can draw favorable district lines — with the potential for gerrymandering — after the 2020 census. The state legislative campaign arms of both parties said wins in Florida,... Read More
Given the massive media attention it receives every four years as home to the first-in-the-nation presidential primary, it's sometimes easy to forget that New Hampshire is also a swing state. For decades, polling has shown independent-minded New Hampshirites are nearly always evenly split on which presidential... Read More
SAN JOSE, Calif. — The 2020 presidential hopefuls have bashed Facebook for its record of playing loose with user data, allowing political ads that spread lies and letting foreign actors mislead voters — and yet, they can’t get enough of the social media juggernaut. Facebook ads... Read More
WASHINGTON - Even among battleground states, Wisconsin is considered special; a study in political contrasts if ever there was one. It went for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, flipped to Donald Trump in 2016 by the narrowest of margins -- just 0.77% -- then turned... Read More