Jill Stein Wants a Federal Court to Block Philadelphia’s Voting Machines
PHILADELPHIA — Jill Stein asked a federal court Tuesday to bar Philadelphia’s new voting machines from being used, saying Pennsylvania should never have approved the machines and is breaking the terms of a settlement she reached late last year with the Pennsylvania Department of State.
That agreement, which ended the Green Party candidate’s 2016 election recount lawsuit, requires the department to only certify machines that use voter-verifiable paper ballots that can be audited after an election. Prior to the settlement, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf last year ordered every county to buy new voting machines that leave such a paper trail behind.
But the new system used in Philadelphia and other counties, the ExpressVote XL from vendor Election Systems & Software (ES&S), is insecure and violates that agreement, Stein said.
In the motion filed Tuesday, Stein and Pennsylvania voters who joined in her lawsuit asked the federal court in Philadelphia to order the Department of State to immediately decertify the ExpressVote XL and block it from being recertified.
Stein mounted a third-party presidential campaign in 2016, one that many Democrats blame for taking votes from Hillary Clinton and swinging the election to Donald Trump.
“Pennsylvania officials have insisted on ramming these machines through in a secretive, heavy-handed process,” Stein said in a statement. “They’ve left us no other option but to ask the court to enforce our settlement agreement to ensure that Pennsylvania voters have a voting system they can trust in time for the 2020 elections.”
The Pennsylvania Department of State declined to comment. If Stein is successful, counties in the state would be prohibited from using the machines, and those who already have them would be forced to buy new ones before the 2020 election.
Stein’s motion argued that the new machines don’t produce true paper ballots that can be verified by voters, that election results are determined based on printed bar codes that voters cannot read, and that the machines are insecure and could allow ballots to be modified after submission.
Taken together, Stein said, those issues make it impossible for voters to verify their selections are recorded and counted properly. And it also makes it impossible to audit and confirm the results of any election conducted on the machines.
A spokesperson for ES&S said the system “has been through hundreds of thousands of hours of testing,” and noted that it was certified first by the federal Election Assistance Commission and then twice by the Pennsylvania Department of State.
“They put the ExpressVote XL through extensive testing not just once, but twice,” spokesperson Katina Granger said in an email. “By all accounts, it meets and exceeds the highest standards for security, accuracy and accessibility.”
Philadelphia used the new machines in local election this month, at a cost of $29 million. Northampton County also used the new system this month, and Cumberland County plans to use it next year. Other counties have not yet chosen their machines.
©2019 The Philadelphia Inquirer
Visit The Philadelphia Inquirer at www.inquirer.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON — More than ever, Eric Harris is mindful of the elected officials around him: The school board members deciding whether his children will go back to the classroom, the sheriff influencing how officers interact with people like him, and the U.S. president steering the country’s... Read More
WASHINGTON — Dave and Diane Schell, a retired social studies teacher and a retired human resources professional from South Windsor, Connecticut, left their careers in 2015, and have worked the polls at their local precinct every election since. But not this November. The Schells — he’s... Read More
ATLANTA — Fierce battles over which votes count are already being fought in courts this election season, with armies of voting rights advocates, political parties and attorneys gearing up to bring more challenges to Georgia election laws when ballots are cast. The most significant court intervention... Read More
WASHINGTON — The controversial new chief of the U.S. Postal Service had not even started his job when a disturbing thing happened to hundreds of thousands of Americans who cast ballots by mail in primary elections this spring. Their votes were never counted. The torrent of... Read More
WASHINGTON — When the pandemic hit and more than a thousand usual poll workers backed out of working the April primary in Madison, Wisconsin, City Clerk Maribeth Witzel-Behl needed replacements who were available to work late, had customer service skills and knew how to assess a... Read More
COLUMBUS, Ohio — As Ohioans stake the names of their preferred candidates in the November election outside their homes, a new form of activism is showing up alongside the traditional candidate yard signs. Absentee ballot requests, voter registration forms and other nonpartisan information about how to... Read More