Court Sides With Insurers in Denying Restaurants Coverage for Pandemic

March 13, 2023 by Tom Ramstack
Court Sides With Insurers in Denying Restaurants Coverage for Pandemic
District of Columbia Court of Appeals. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — A restaurant group lost out last week at a Washington, D.C., court in their attempt to recover lost profits from the COVID-19 pandemic under their insurance policies.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the restaurants failed to prove they suffered any physical damage to their property, which is required before their insurers must cover their losses.

The restaurants in Rose’s 1, LLC, et al. v. Erie Ins. Exch. argued their business interruption policies were supposed to protect them against the kind of natural disaster created by the pandemic.

It resulted in a government-ordered shutdown of restaurants and other retail establishments as the pandemic sickened millions of Americans. It also continued to keep customers away after the quarantine orders were lifted.


From the time the shutdown orders were issued in March 2020 until the devastation for the industry eased in June 2021, an estimated 90,000 restaurants and taverns were forced to close, according to the National Restaurant Association.

The original lawsuit was filed in D.C. Superior Court by Washington, D.C., restaurant business Rose’s 1 LLC, doing business as Rose’s Luxury, along with more than a dozen other restaurants. The Restaurant Law Center and the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington filed an amicus curiae brief that agrees with the restaurants.


Business interruption insurance “is designed to protect the business’ commercial viability by allowing it to meet its ongoing obligations and to replace lost revenue when confronted with a sudden, unplanned closure,” the brief says.

The failure of the insurance policies to list exclusions for pandemics is a risk assumed by insurers, the brief says.

“District law requiring insurance contracts to be construed in favor of the insured should apply with particular force here, where insurers were aware of pandemic risk yet failed to exclude it in unambiguous terms,” the brief says.

The D.C. Court of Appeals disagreed based largely on policy terms that allowed coverage only for “direct” and “physical” losses. The court’s ruling said that “loss of covered property must be tangible and material,” which did not include customers staying away because of a disease.


The court concluded that “‘direct physical loss of or damage’ does not include a loss of use, and coverage of ‘all risks’ does not mean that coverage can be extended beyond the policy’s terms.”

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and Twitter

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Insurance

March 13, 2023
by Tom Ramstack
Court Sides With Insurers in Denying Restaurants Coverage for Pandemic

WASHINGTON — A restaurant group lost out last week at a Washington, D.C., court in their attempt to recover lost... Read More

WASHINGTON — A restaurant group lost out last week at a Washington, D.C., court in their attempt to recover lost profits from the COVID-19 pandemic under their insurance policies. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the restaurants failed to prove they... Read More

January 31, 2023
by Dan McCue
CMS Seeking to Claw Back Improper Medicare Advantage Payments

WASHINGTON — The federal government will begin auditing Medicare Advantage insurers under a new rule finalized Monday, the heightened scrutiny... Read More

WASHINGTON — The federal government will begin auditing Medicare Advantage insurers under a new rule finalized Monday, the heightened scrutiny expected to return as much as $4.7 billion to Medicare’s trust fund over the next 10 years. Watchdog groups had long complained about questionable charges to... Read More

Exercise Caution With Zero-Premium Medicare Advantage Plans

Health insurers will flood the Medicare Advantage market again this fall with enticing offers for plans that have no monthly... Read More

Health insurers will flood the Medicare Advantage market again this fall with enticing offers for plans that have no monthly price tag. The number of so-called zero-premium plans has been growing for years, and they can appeal to retirees who live on fixed incomes. Experts say... Read More

UnitedHealth Closes Roughly $8B Deal for Change Healthcare

MINNETONKA, Minn. (AP) — UnitedHealth Group said Monday that it completed its acquisition of Change Healthcare, closing the roughly $8... Read More

MINNETONKA, Minn. (AP) — UnitedHealth Group said Monday that it completed its acquisition of Change Healthcare, closing the roughly $8 billion deal a couple weeks after a judge rejected a challenge from federal regulators. UnitedHealth is merging the technology company with its Optum segment. The health... Read More

September 12, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Maryland Court to Decide if Pandemic Requires Insurers to Cover Businesses

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland's high court is expected to rule soon on whether insurers for corporations whose businesses suffered because... Read More

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland's high court is expected to rule soon on whether insurers for corporations whose businesses suffered because of the COVID-19 pandemic must cover the lost income. On Friday, the Maryland Court of Appeals heard arguments from fashion company Tapestry, Inc., which says it... Read More

Catholic Hospitals' Growth Impacts Reproductive Health Care

PUTNAM, Conn. (AP) — Even as numerous Republican-governed states push for sweeping bans on abortion, there is a coinciding surge... Read More

PUTNAM, Conn. (AP) — Even as numerous Republican-governed states push for sweeping bans on abortion, there is a coinciding surge of concern in some Democratic-led states that options for reproductive health care are dwindling due to expansion of Catholic hospital networks. These are states such as... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top