Texas Abortion Ban Reinstated by Appeals Court Following Brief Suspension
Just days after a preliminary injunction allowed health care providers to resume performing abortions, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit temporarily restored a Texas law banning the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy.
The ruling came two short days after a temporary order from U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman prevented the law’s enforcement. Now, with the law going back into effect, the Department of Justice has until Tuesday evening to respond to the latest ruling.
“Texas Democrats continue to urge Congress to codify Roe v. Wade and ensure abortion rights are finally, fully protected for all Americans,” Texas Democratic Party Co-Executive Director Hannah Roe Beck said in a written statement.
“In 2021, it’s an outrage that a handful of conservative politicians are still meddling in our right to make the most important, intimate decisions about our lives. Advocates have been fighting tooth and nail to protect Texans’ right to access abortion, and Texas Democrats — and people across Texas and around the country — have been rising up alongside them. We will not go back.”
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas claiming violations of the 14th Amendment after the Supreme Court broke precedent by denying injunctive relief when the case was brought before it. The appeals court asserted in its ruling the district court lacked the jurisdiction to halt the law’s enforcement and that Texas is likely to prevail on the appeal.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court maintained that the applicants were not entitled to injunctive relief because it “cannot expunge the law itself” and that an injunction “would utterly fail to prevent any of the harm they claim will occur once Texas Senate Bill 8 becomes effective.”
Texas Right to Life Director of Media and Communication Kimberlyn Schwartz praised the appeals court’s ruling in a written statement, calling it an “answered prayer.”
“We’re grateful that this tremendous impact will continue,” Schwartz said. “We expect the Biden administration to appeal to the Supreme Court of the U.S., and we are confident Texas will continue to defeat these attacks on our life-saving efforts.”
Texas’ abortion ban has proven to be difficult to strike down because it leaves enforcement of the restrictions to private citizens through the civil court system instead of the state Attorney General’s office or other state officials. Weeks after the law’s enactment in May, TWN reported clinics across the country saw an influx of women traveling from Texas to get abortions.
In September, TWN reported House Democrats sought to codify the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision by passing the “Women’s Health Protection Act,” a bill intended to guarantee the right to an abortion regardless of state laws on the matter. The bill passed in a 218-211 vote along party lines, but faced an uncertain path forward in the narrowly divided Senate.
“The Fifth Circuit has failed again to preserve a critical right that has long existed in the United States,” Adriana Piñon, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas, said in a written statement. “We’ve already seen the devastation caused by allowing this extremist law to exist for a few weeks. Texans are traveling hundreds of miles to access abortion care in overwhelmed clinics outside the state.”
Piñon continued, “People without the money to travel will be forced to continue with pregnancies they decided not to carry. That reality will especially impact communities of color. Black women have a maternal mortality rate three times that of White women, and this law will only make that worse. Abortion is critical health care, and no one should be denied safe and legal access to it.”
Reece can be reached at [email protected].
In The News
In The States
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday held that Republican lawmakers in North Carolina can intervene to defend the state’s... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday held that Republican lawmakers in North Carolina can intervene to defend the state’s controversial voter-ID law, despite the fact the state’s Democratic attorney general is already defending it. The 8-1 ruling in Berger v. NC NAACP did not delve... Read More
ST. LOUIS — An Arkansas law targeting boycotts of Israel did not infringe on constitutionally protected free speech rights because... Read More
ST. LOUIS — An Arkansas law targeting boycotts of Israel did not infringe on constitutionally protected free speech rights because it was intended to serve “a purely commercial purpose,” the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Wednesday. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represented... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has released its Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a proposed 1,100 MW... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has released its Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a proposed 1,100 MW offshore wind energy project in waters off the coast of New Jersey. The agency will publish a notice of availability of the Draft EIS on Friday,... Read More
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The head of the Texas state police pronounced the law enforcement response to the Uvalde school... Read More
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The head of the Texas state police pronounced the law enforcement response to the Uvalde school shooting an “abject failure," telling lawmakers that there were enough officers and firepower on the scene to have stopped the gunman three minutes after he entered... Read More
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Katie Britt won the Republican nomination for Senate in Alabama Tuesday, defeating six-term Rep. Mo Brooks... Read More
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Katie Britt won the Republican nomination for Senate in Alabama Tuesday, defeating six-term Rep. Mo Brooks in a primary runoff after former President Donald Trump took the unusual step of rescinding his initial Brooks endorsement. The loss ends a turbulent campaign that... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Tuesday it will try to resolve a dispute between New York and New Jersey... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Tuesday it will try to resolve a dispute between New York and New Jersey over the latter’s desire to back out of a 1953 agreement to work together to combat corruption and racketeering on the waterfront docks the two states... Read More