California Voters Support Gov. Newsom In Recall Fight, Survey Finds
SACRAMENTO, Calif. – A majority of California voters say they would vote for Gov. Gavin Newsom to keep his position in a recall election, a new survey finds.
The survey, conducted earlier this month by the Public Policy Institute of California, reports that 40% of likely voters would vote to remove Newsom and 57% would vote not to remove him, meaning that the recall effort would fail if the vote were held this month.
The survey was based on interviews with 1,700 Californian adults and it was conducted between May 9-18, around the same time Newsom introduced his state budget, Associate Survey Director and Research Associate Dean Bonner said at a presentation of the survey’s results on Wednesday. Representatives of the institution pointed out the results are consistent with polling conducted by PPIC in March.
“The remarkably stable opposition to the recall of Gavin Newsom is driven by a large and consistent partisan divide that favors the Democratic governor,” said Mark Baldassare, PPIC president and CEO, in a written comment.
On state issues, the survey found that a majority of Californians also view Newsom’s job performance and his handling of COVID-19 favorably.
The survey also asked open-ended questions about what Californians view as the most important problem facing the state.
In the presentation of the survey’s results, Baldassare highlighted that COVID-19 has slipped from the number one priority to the second priority as people in the state look to jobs and the economy, driven largely by the economic impacts of COVID-19.
“I think Californians will be looking over the next few months at what’s going on with our economy,” Baldassare said.
“We have high unemployment. Things are improving, but will they improve uniformly? What will it mean to have the full re-opening of the economy that the governor has announced for June 15th?” he said.
Housing-related concerns have also grown, according to Baldassare.
The California governor will likely face the second-ever recall vote in the state’s history later this year.
Organizers turned in 1,719,943 valid signatures before the March 17 filing deadline, triggering a likely recall election for Newsom later this year, though the exact date has not yet been determined.
The recall petition listed Newsom’s implementation of laws that “favor foreign nationals, in our country illegally, over that of our own citizens,” as well as numerous other issues, including the high tax rate, homelessness, water-use rations, and Newsom’s stance on the death penalty, according to documents presented by Ballotpedia.
In the summer of 2020, Newsom responded by saying that an “unwarranted” recall effort would cost state taxpayers $81 million.
At the end of last year, Newsom spokesperson Dan Newman said that the proposal was being supported by a “ragtag crew of pro-Trump, anti-vaccine extremists, along with some ambitious Republican politicians who would like to be governor,” who were imposing an unnecessary expense on taxpayers in the state.
Previous opinion polling has varied on the percentage, but most have shown a voter preference for the “no, don’t recall” option.
The other recall, which was successful, was against Gov Gray Davis, a Democrat, in 2003. That led to the election of Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, to the governorship.
Voter’s mood in 2021 is very different than it was in the 2003 recall effort, Baldassare said.
In 2003, Baldassare said, nearly half of voters said that things in the state would improve if Governor Davis were removed from office, which tracked with the number of voters who voted in favor of the recall. In contrast, only 29% of voters now say that things would improve if Governor Newsom were removed from office, while 34% say things would get worse.
In The News
In The States
The League of Women Voters of Michigan filed an amicus brief with the state's Supreme Court this week in support of the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission's proposed extended timeline for adopting final redistricting plans. The commission was formed after a 2018 public referendum in which... Read More
The state of Kansas has been awarded Area Development Magazine’s prestigious Gold Shovel award in recognition of its successful year attracting high-value business investment. Over $6 billion in new business dollars and more than 26 thousand jobs have been created within the state of Kansas since... Read More
In South Carolina, the state government is matching broadband service providers dollar-for-dollar if they build out networks to the identified unserved areas, said Andrew Rein, chief financial officer of telecommunications provider Hargray, Wednesday. And the need for accurately mapping these areas without access to high-speed broadband... Read More
Jack Ciattarelli, a moderate Republican from New Jersey, and Terry McAuliffe, an establishment Democrat from Virginia, both had strong victories in last night's gubernatorial primaries against their respective party’s political competition. Now in the last stretch of a race to the governor’s office, they face several... Read More
COLUMBUS, Ohio - As Congress continues to grapple with whether high-speed internet should be considered essential infrastructure, as important as water and electricity, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost took an unprecedented step against Alphabet's Google yesterday. In what the AG's office statement describes as a "landmark... Read More
A judge on Tuesday ordered a Leesburg, Va., elementary teacher reinstated in his job after he was suspended for refusing to address transgender and nonbinary students according to their gender preferences. Physical education teacher Byron “Tanner” Cross refused to address transgender and nonbinary girls as “she”... Read More