Justices Hold Title 42 to Remain in Place Pending Expedited Review

December 28, 2022 by Dan McCue
Justices Hold Title 42 to Remain in Place Pending Expedited Review
Migrants from Venezuela prepare for relocation to a refugee shelter in Matamoros, Mexico, Dec. 23, 2022. (AP Photo/Fernando Llano, File)

WASHINGTON —  A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday held that Title 42, the pandemic-era rule that restricted migration at the southwestern border on public health grounds, will remain in place pending an expedited ruling and future ruling by the justices.

In a brief, unsigned order, a majority of the justices stayed a trial court’s ruling that the Biden administration must lift the measure, and said the court would hear arguments in the case in its February sitting.

The majority went on to explain that the court’s review at that hearing will be limited to the question of intervention — in other words, on whether the 19 mainly Republican-led states that had sought the stay could pursue their challenge to the measure.

“While the underlying merits of the District Court’s summary judgment order are pertinent to that analysis, the court does not grant review of those merits, which have not yet been addressed by the Court of Appeals,” the order said.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil M. Gorsuch and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that this particular “case-specific decision is not of special importance in its own right and would not normally warrant expedited review.” 

“The D.C. Circuit’s intervention ruling takes on whatever salience it has only because of its presence in a larger underlying dispute about the Title 42 orders,” Gorsuch wrote. “And on that score, it is unclear what we might accomplish. 

“Even if at the end of it all we find that the states are permitted to intervene, and even if the states manage on remand to demonstrate that the Title 42 orders were lawfully adopted, the emergency on which those orders were premised has long since lapsed,” he continued. 

“In April 2022, the federal government terminated the Title 42 orders after determining that emergency immigration restrictions were no longer necessary or appropriate to address COVID-19,” the dissent said. 

“The states may question whether the government followed the right administrative steps before issuing this decision (an issue on which I express no view). But they do not seriously dispute that the public-health justification undergirding the Title 42 orders has lapsed,” Gorsuch added. “And it is hardly obvious why we should rush in to review a ruling on a motion to intervene in a case concerning emergency decrees that have outlived their shelf life.”

The real eye opener in the dissent comes at the end, when Gorsuch conceded he understands the concerns border states have about the end of Title 42 and the “disruptive consenquences” that may come of it.

That said, he wrote, “the current border crisis is not a COVID crisis. And courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency. We are a court of law, not policymakers of last resort.”

In a statement from the White House, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, “The Supreme Court’s order today keeps the current Title 42 policy in place while the court reviews the matter in 2023. We will, of course, comply with the order and prepare for the court’s review.

“At the same time, we are advancing our preparations to manage the border in a secure, orderly and humane way when Title 42 eventually lifts and will continue expanding legal pathways for immigration,” Jean-Pierre continued. “Title 42 is a public health measure, not an immigration enforcement measure, and it should not be extended indefinitely.  

“To truly fix our broken immigration system, we need Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform measures like the ones President Biden proposed on his first day in office,” she added. “Today’s order gives Republicans in Congress plenty of time to move past political finger-pointing and join their Democratic colleagues in solving the challenge at our border by passing the comprehensive reform measures and delivering the additional funds for border security that President Biden has requested.”

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • Supreme Court
  • Title 42
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Immigration

    July 11, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    HHS Bans Undocumented Immigrants From Head Start, Other Taxpayer-Funded Programs

    WASHINGTON — The Department of Health and Human Services on Thursday slammed the door on undocumented immigrants accessing taxpayer-funded programs,... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Department of Health and Human Services on Thursday slammed the door on undocumented immigrants accessing taxpayer-funded programs, saying those benefits were never intended to subsidize those in the U.S. illegally. Specifically, the department rescinded a 1998 interpretation of the Personal Responsibility and Work... Read More

    The Solution to Trump’s Immigration Debacle? Immigration Reform

    Since June 6, immigration enforcement operations have surged across Los Angeles. In just the first 10 days of June, 722 individuals... Read More

    Since June 6, immigration enforcement operations have surged across Los Angeles. In just the first 10 days of June, 722 individuals were arrested, according to the Deportation Data Project. But the data tells a deeper story: 417 individuals had no criminal record; 84 others had pending charges;... Read More

    New Hampshire Judge to Pause Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order

    CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A federal judge in New Hampshire said Thursday he will certify a class action lawsuit including... Read More

    CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A federal judge in New Hampshire said Thursday he will certify a class action lawsuit including all children who will be affected by President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship and issue a preliminary injunction blocking it. Judge Joseph LaPlante announced his decision after an... Read More

    July 3, 2025
    by Sydney Devory
    Judge Blocks Trump Removal of Temporary Legal Protections for Haitians

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge in New York on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from ending temporary legal status for... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge in New York on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from ending temporary legal status for more than 500,000 Haitians currently living in the United States. U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan ruled that abruptly moving up the expiration date of the temporary... Read More

    Trump Directs ICE to Expand Deportations in Democratic-Run Cities, Undeterred by Protests

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Sunday directed federal immigration officials to prioritize deportations from Democratic-run cities, a move that comes... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Sunday directed federal immigration officials to prioritize deportations from Democratic-run cities, a move that comes after large protests erupted in Los Angeles and other major cities against the Trump administration’s immigration policies. Trump in a social media posting called on U.S. Immigration and Customs... Read More

    Appeals Court Temporarily Blocks Judge's Ruling to Return Control of National Guard to California

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that... Read More

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California after he deployed them there following protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids. The court... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top