Federal Judge Stays Title 42 Ruling to Give Administration Time to Adjust

November 17, 2022 by Dan McCue
Federal Judge Stays Title 42 Ruling to Give Administration Time to Adjust
FILE - Four men from Cuba try to keep warm after crossing the border from Mexico and surrendering to authorities to apply for asylum on Nov. 3, 2022, near Yuma, Ariz. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File)

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Wednesday granted the Biden administration’s request for a stay of his earlier order, striking down the controversial Title 42, a Trump-era immigration policy that has since allowed authorities to expel more than 2.4 million migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said in his latest order on the policy that he was granting the requested stay with “great reluctance.”

The official end of Title 42 will now come at midnight on Dec. 21.

In a written statement, the American Bar Association, which had opposed the policy, said it looked forward to the demise of what it called “a pandemic-era border expulsion policy.”

“The ABA believes that all people seeking protection from persecution or torture are entitled to a full and fair adjudication comporting with U.S. and international law,” the statement said. 

“Instead, Title 42 has blocked asylum seekers from applying for protection at the border and led to their expulsion from the U.S. without adjudication of their claims,” it continued.

Sullivan had only just struck the immigration policy down on Tuesday, writing in his order that Title 42 is “arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Policy Act.”

Prior to Title 42, all migrants arrested at the border were allowed into the U.S. and processed under immigration law. 

Sullivan’s order restores that policy, allowing asylum seekers to wait in the U.S. and await their day in immigration court.

Sullivan also chastised the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which issued the public health order on which Title 42 was premised, for its decision “to ignore the harm” its order could potentially cause.

Among other things, he wrote, the CDC failed to consider alternatives to expulsion such as allowing migrants to self-quarantine in the U.S. homes of family and friends, or even homeless shelters.

“With regard to whether defendants could have ‘ramped up vaccinations, outdoor processing, and all other available public health measures’ …  the court finds the CDC failed to articulate a satisfactory explanation for why such measures were not feasible,” Sullivan wrote.

But Lee Gelernt, the American Civil Liberties Union attorney who argued the case, said Title 42 was “never about public health.”

“Tuesday’s ruling finally ends the charade of using Title 42 to bar desperate asylum seekers from even getting a hearing,” he said.

In a statement following the ruling, the Department of Homeland Security said that, if granted, “the delay in implementation of the court’s order will allow the government to prepare for an orderly transition to new policies at the border.”

The department added that it would continue to enforce immigration laws at the border, work with other countries to take action against smuggling networks and “address the root causes of irregular migration.”

More than 2.4 million Title 42 expulsions have been carried out at the U.S.-Mexico border since the policy was first put in place under former President Donald Trump in March 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

But in April, the CDC said the order was no longer needed to stop the spread of COVID-19. 

With that, the Biden administration began making plans to rescind the policy, but its intentions were upended by a federal judge in Louisiana, who ruled the White House couldn’t end it without having a plan in place to protect the two dozen states who sued to keep Title 42 on the books.

Barring appeal, Sullivan’s ruling could be the last word on the matter.

Among those who cheered his initial ruling on Tuesday were members of the faith and religious community.

“This ruling is an important step in working towards finally restoring asylum at our border,” said Dylan Corbett, executive director of the Hope Border Institute in El Paso, Texas.

“As a border community, we see daily the tragic human consequences of asylum-denying policies like Title 42,” Corbett said. 

“Judge Sullivan’s ruling provides the Biden administration with a clear opportunity to do the right thing and put into place policies which welcome vulnerable persons on the move with dignity and compassion,” he added.

Meanwhile, Anna Gallagher, executive director of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, based here in Washington said she and her members are praying the decision will “lead to a reimagination and rebuilding of border and asylum policy.”

“The U.S. has the resources to move quickly and create well-functioning systems that honor the right to seek asylum — we only need commitment, creativity and compassion,” she said.

But not everyone viewed the ruling so happily.

For instance, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said, “what is happening now on the border and has happened the last two years under the Biden administration has been nothing short of a humanitarian and public safety crisis.”

“And if you think things are bad now, they’re about to get worse,” he said.

Cornyn called Title 42 a tool that Border Control officers could use to at least “try to modulate the flow of people coming across the border.

“This isn’t a time to start scrambling and come up with a plan. It should have been happening years ago,” the senator said.

In a statement the Department of Health and Human Services said the delay in implementation of the court’s order “will allow the government to prepare for an orderly transition to new policies at the border.”

“But to be clear, under the unopposed motion, Title 42 would remain in place for some period. During the period of this freeze, we will prepare for an orderly transition to new policies at the border,” the department said.

“We continue to work with countries throughout the Western Hemisphere to take enforcement actions against the smuggling networks that entice migrants to take the dangerous and often deadly journey to our land borders and to address the root causes of irregular migration that are challenging our hemisphere as a whole,” the statement said.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • American Bar Association
  • Biden administration
  • federal courts
  • Immigration
  • Title 42
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Immigration

    Abrego Garcia Should Be Returned to US

    The Trump administration’s refusal to demand the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia — an immigrant from El Salvador whom U.S. officials mistakenly... Read More

    The Trump administration’s refusal to demand the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia — an immigrant from El Salvador whom U.S. officials mistakenly deported to a prison in his native country — is illegal, unconstitutional, immoral and unAmerican.  If the deportation without due process of law of a man... Read More

    US Intelligence Contradicts Trump Claims Linking Gang to Venezuelan Government to Speed Deportations

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A new U.S. intelligence assessment found no coordination between Tren de Aragua and the Venezuelan government, contradicting... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A new U.S. intelligence assessment found no coordination between Tren de Aragua and the Venezuelan government, contradicting statements that Trump administration officials have made to justify their invocation of the Alien Enemies Act and deporting Venezuelan migrants, according to U.S. officials. The classified assessment... Read More

    Tennessee’s GOP Leads the Fight to Deny Public Education to Children Without Documents

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Damian Felipe Jimenez has many dreams about his future — he could be a restaurant owner,... Read More

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Damian Felipe Jimenez has many dreams about his future — he could be a restaurant owner, a scientist or maybe something else. As he works through sixth grade, he knows education will be critical in making his dreams a reality, but he's... Read More

    April 15, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    El Salvadoran President Says Deported Maryland Man Won’t Be Returned

    WASHINGTON — El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele told reporters in the Oval Office on Monday that a Maryland man deported... Read More

    WASHINGTON — El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele told reporters in the Oval Office on Monday that a Maryland man deported to his country by the Trump administration will not be returned to the United States, despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s call for the White House to... Read More

    Supreme Court Says Trump Administration Must Work to Bring Back Mistakenly Deported Maryland Man

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday said the Trump administration must work to bring back a Maryland man who was... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday said the Trump administration must work to bring back a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to prison in El Salvador, rejecting the administration’s emergency appeal. The court acted in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran citizen who had... Read More

    Many Older AAPI Adults Are Foreign-Born. They're Also Tough on Immigration, a new Poll Finds

    WASHINGTON (AP) — There are sharp generational disagreements among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders when it comes to... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — There are sharp generational disagreements among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders when it comes to how the U.S. should handle mass deportations, with older AAPI adults — many of whom are themselves immigrants — taking a much tougher stance on unlawful... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top