Bipartisan, Bicameral Groups of Lawmakers Push to Delay Title 42 End

April 11, 2022 by Reece Nations
Bipartisan, Bicameral Groups of Lawmakers Push to Delay Title 42 End
Estela Lazo stands for a portrait with her two children, late Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2021, in Tijuana, Mexico. The Honduran family waits in the Mexican border city to have their case for asylum in the United States heard. As President Joe Biden undoes his predecessor's immigration policies that he considers inhumane, he faces a major question: How far should he go to right perceived wrongs? (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)

WASHINGTON — Since the Biden administration’s announcement marking the expected end of the Title 42 migrant expulsion health authority, bipartisan and bicameral lawmakers have pushed back on the policy’s revocation.

Legislation was introduced last week by Sens. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., along with a bipartisan coalition, to delay the planned end to Title 42 for at least 60 days past its initial expiration date of May 23. The proposal would compel the Biden administration to produce a comprehensive immigration plan prior to lifting the public health authority.

Another bill was filed in the House by Reps. Jared Golden, D-Maine, and Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, to similarly prevent the White House from lifting the expulsion authority without a plan in place from the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Health and Human Services that addresses the anticipated surge of migrants.

“It is increasingly apparent that the administration’s decision to end Title 42 without replacing it with a comprehensive plan to secure our southern border will only put further strain on our broken immigration system,” said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Penn., a House cosponsor of the Title 42 extension bill.

“I’ve witnessed firsthand the threats our nation faces from a porous border and a fragmented immigration system, and that’s why we must demand accountability from the administration with respect to implementing a workable plan that will ensure the humane treatment of migrants and keep our border and neighboring communities safe and secure.”

Golden said that while Title 42 cannot remain in place permanently, Biden must act to ensure DHS and its personnel and facilities are fully prepared prior to its rescission. Title 42 was first rolled out in March 2020 by the Trump administration.

After meeting with Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas last week, Sinema said it was evident that current preparations for the end of Title 42 were not adequate. Southwest land border encounters by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in February rose by 6.6% from the previous month, and the agency said it expects this figure to increase once Title 42 is revoked.

“The Biden administration was wrong to set an end date for Title 42 without a comprehensive plan in place,” said Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., a cosponsor of the Senate bill to delay the public health authority’s end.  

“It’s why today we are introducing bipartisan legislation requiring this administration to implement a plan before lifting Title 42 that protects the public health and safety of our border communities and migrants. We need a secure, orderly, and humane response at our southern border and our bipartisan legislation holds the Biden administration accountable to that.”

As some lawmakers celebrated the plan to revoke Title 42, others warned long-lasting reverberations would be felt without additional border security measures in place. Mixed reactions were present on both sides of the aisle, The Well News previously reported.

Immigrant rights advocates heralded the decision to let the public health authority expire, as it circumvented typical border apprehension procedures that included credible fear interviews to assess asylum claims. Under Title 42, CBP is not obligated to conduct credible fear interviews, leading some to question the inherent goal of the order.

“It’s very clear that Title 42 is a pretext,” Kate Huddleston, staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, told The Well News. “It circumvented ordinary [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] processes because the CDC did not think that the policy was in fact necessary or appropriate to deal with a pandemic.

“And it’s very clear in the implementation of Title 42 that the administration is not using it as some sort of pandemic measure, but rather as a measure to control the flow or to control applications for asylum and to keep people from seeking asylum in the United States.” 

Reece can be reached at [email protected]

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Immigration

March 19, 2024
by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Gives Texas Green Light to Deport Illegal Immigrants

WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials... Read More

WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials to deport undocumented immigrants, despite objections from the Biden administration, which argued only the federal government has authority over immigration issues. In an unsigned order, the... Read More

CDC Team Joins Response to Seven Measles Cases in Chicago Shelter for Migrants

CHICAGO (AP) — Seven people living at a Chicago shelter for migrants have tested positive for measles since last week,... Read More

CHICAGO (AP) — Seven people living at a Chicago shelter for migrants have tested positive for measles since last week, prompting the arrival of a team with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to guide city and state officials' response to the infections, including vaccination... Read More

Supreme Court Allows Federal Agents to Cut Razor Wire Texas Installed on US-Mexico Border

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed Border Patrol agents to resume cutting for now razor wire that... Read More

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed Border Patrol agents to resume cutting for now razor wire that Texas installed along a stretch of the U.S.-Mexico border that is at the center of an escalating standoff between the Biden administration and the state over immigration enforcement. The... Read More

Reliance on Immigration Detention Is Trapping Us All  

I was sitting in church a few Sundays ago and, as is often the case, during a quiet moment, my... Read More

I was sitting in church a few Sundays ago and, as is often the case, during a quiet moment, my mind turned to work. Then, the congregation stood up and we began singing the hymn, “I’ll Fly Away.” The line that I love is, “like a... Read More

Biden Administration Sues Abbott Over Rio Grande Buoy Barrier Meant to Stop Migrants

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Justice Department on Monday sued Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over a newly installed floating barrier on the... Read More

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Justice Department on Monday sued Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over a newly installed floating barrier on the Rio Grande that is the Republican's latest aggressive tactic to try to stop migrants from crossing into the U.S. from Mexico. The lawsuit asks a federal... Read More

June 23, 2023
by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Revives Biden Deportation Guidelines

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday revived immigration guidelines set by the Biden administration that prioritized the arrest and... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday revived immigration guidelines set by the Biden administration that prioritized the arrest and deportation of individuals known to pose a national security risk to the nation or “egregious threats to public safety” over those who merely entered the country... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top