The More We Stay Home, The Less the Coronavirus Spreads. Here’s the Evidence

July 24, 2020by Melissa Healy, Los Angeles Times (TNS)
Leonard Pagarigan, 74, plays the saxophone on his deck at home in Rolling Hills Estates, California as the sun sets on Saturday, May 2, 2020, as he's been doing once or twice a week during the safer at home order. (Christina House/Los Angeles Times/TNS)

Remember when you decided against a trip to the dog park, a meet-up at a sports bar, or a visit to your sister’s house?

New research shows that such social distancing decisions mattered back in April, when the coronavirus was still expanding its reach across the United States. And with the pandemic continuing to gather steam in much of the country, they probably matter now as well.

The new study estimates just how readily the coronavirus jumped from person to person in 211 key counties that are home to roughly 55% of U.S. residents. It finds that the more assiduously we avoided nonessential outings, the less briskly the virus that causes COVID-19 spread.

For instance, when residents of a typical county cut their visits to nonessential businesses in half, a single infected person transmitted the virus to 46% fewer people than she would have in a county where business proceeded as usual, the study authors found. In some counties, that reduction could end the outbreak.

The researchers, led by Dr. David Rubin, a pediatrician and director of the PolicyLab at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, aimed to measure how much three variables — social distancing behavior, population density and ambient temperature — influenced coronavirus spread by putting more or fewer victims within contagion range of an infected person’s sneeze.

Their clearest finding: Social distancing matters most.

Published Thursday in the journal JAMA Network Open, the study calculated prevailing transmission levels in counties that are home to state capitals or claim at least 100,000 residents. For each county, the researchers used cellphone data to track changes in people’s average daily movements. Then they looked at how new infections rose or fell roughly a week later.

The reckoning is based on trends documented between Feb. 25 and April 23, when the coronavirus was spreading in all 211 counties but social distancing behaviors varied widely. It uses a measure of spread — the instantaneous reproductive number — that allows researchers to directly compare transmission rates in counties with well-established outbreaks to rates in counties where spread has just begun.

For the purposes of their study, the researchers assumed that a single coronavirus particle expelled in the sneeze of someone in Sonoma County is as inherently transmissible as a viral particle in Plymouth County, Mass.

Population density mattered. Given the same degree of social distancing by residents, the coronavirus spread more efficiently in counties with lots of apartment dwellers and shared spaces than it did in counties with more wide open spaces.

But social distancing decisions mattered more.

Assuming that a typical American made four nonessential trips on a typical pre-pandemic day, the researchers determined that in counties where residents scrubbed all of those trips, the virus spread less than when only three trips were skipped. Overall, the researchers saw a linear correlation between the number of nonessential outings by a county’s residents and the number of people a single person could infect.

And the impact of social distancing was magnified in densely populated counties, where the virus transmitted more efficiently from person to person to begin with.

Weather mattered too, but not as much as social distancing, and not in straightforward ways. As temperature and humidity levels rose from chilly to a merely cold heat index of 51 degrees Fahrenheit, transmission rates tended to decline. Between 51 and 68 degrees of heat and humidity, the virus’ ability to jump from person to person rose modestly. Then it declined again as the heat index rose above 68 degrees.

The findings suggest that, in parts of the country, autumn’s falling temperatures could give social distancing measures a final, fleeting moment of impact before colder temperatures set in for the winter. When the heat index hovered around 42 degrees and nonessential outings fell by 35%, at least half of the counties saw transmission rates fall too low to sustain an outbreak. With the same chill in the air, a 70% decline in outings slowed transmission to a standstill in virtually every county.

But when the heat index was just above freezing, social distancing measures seemed to have little power to slow transmission. Reducing nonessential outings by 70% halted outbreaks in fewer than half the counties. And with a more modest 35% decline in outings, brisk transmission continued in all but two counties.

The findings provide a timely reminder that, unlike the weather and the number of neighbors we have, there’s a factor Americans can control to slow the coronavirus’ spread, said Georgia State University public health expert Gerardo Chowell, who wasn’t involved in the research.

The results, he added, are in line with those of research in which Chowell and colleagues found countries that implemented social distancing policies with greater speed and vigor have gone on to experience lower transmission rates than countries that dawdled.

The new study’s county-level resolution can help make clear that decisions made by oneself and one’s neighbors — not an influx of outsiders — are the cause of local spread.

“These findings are still relevant,” Chowell said.

He noted that differing testing rates among the 211 counties might limit the study’s ability to predict local trends. But as testing becomes more widespread and consistent across the country, he said the researchers should repeat their analysis to see if changes in social distancing are associated with changes in positive tests.

That, he said, would strengthen the argument that Americans’ individual decisions can affect the pandemic’s trajectory. It would also refine our understanding of how much social distancing is needed to bring the coronavirus to a standstill.

———

©2020 Los Angeles Times

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Health

Biden Releases National Strategy for COVID-19 Response, Pandemic Preparedness
Health
Biden Releases National Strategy for COVID-19 Response, Pandemic Preparedness
January 21, 2021
by Reece Nations

WASHINGTON — On the first full day of his term, President Joe Biden announced his plan to combat the novel coronavirus pandemic, entitled “National Strategy for the COVID-19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness.”  Biden’s strategy includes issuing 10 executive orders to mitigate the virus. In addition to... Read More

Indoor Dining to Resume in the District of Columbia at 25% Capacity
District of Columbia
Indoor Dining to Resume in the District of Columbia at 25% Capacity
January 21, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - Restaurants in the District of Columbia will be able to resume indoor dining at 25% capacity beginning early Friday morning, the chief of staff for Mayor Muriel Bowser said. In a post to his Twitter account, John Falcicchio, who serves as both chief of... Read More

EXPLAINER: What's Next for WHO After US Takes Steps to Stay
Health
EXPLAINER: What's Next for WHO After US Takes Steps to Stay

GENEVA (AP) — The Biden administration has taken quick steps to keep the United States in the World Health Organization and reinforce financial and staffing support for it — part of his ambition to launch a full-throttle effort to fight the COVID-19 pandemic in partnership with... Read More

Biden's US Revives Support for WHO, Reversing Trump Retreat
Health
Biden's US Revives Support for WHO, Reversing Trump Retreat

GENEVA (AP) — The United States will resume funding for the World Health Organization and join its consortium aimed at sharing coronavirus vaccines fairly around the globe, President Joe Biden’s top adviser on the pandemic said Thursday, renewing support for an agency that the Trump administration... Read More

New CDC Director Takes Over Beleaguered Agency Amid Crisis
Health
New CDC Director Takes Over Beleaguered Agency Amid Crisis

NEW YORK (AP) — As the coronavirus swept across the globe last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sank into the shadows, undermined by some of its own mistakes and stifled by an administration bent on downplaying the nation's suffering. Now a new CDC... Read More

Phase 1B: Interest Groups Appeal to States for Access to Coronavirus Vaccine
State News
Phase 1B: Interest Groups Appeal to States for Access to Coronavirus Vaccine
January 19, 2021
by Reece Nations

Interest groups are pleading their cases to state officials in a bid to expedite their constituents’ access to the novel coronavirus vaccine.  Individuals over the age of 70, frontline health care workers, nursing home residents and staff are the first groups of people to receive the... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top