Report Finds Public Option for Health Insurance Could ‘Limit Competition and Consumer Choice’
WASHINGTON – As America inches toward perhaps the most consequential election in its history — the first to be played out against the backdrop of a global viral pandemic — a heated debate continues to rage.
Since the election of President Donald Trump, he and his Republican allies in Congress have worked diligently to undermine key protections of the Affordable Care Act.
Though they tried once, and failed, to outright repeal it, there’s little doubt they will try again should Trump win re-election and they retain control of at least one chamber of Congress.
Meanwhile, the minority progressive wing of the Democratic party has been pushing for one size fits all government health care programs, such as Medicare for All, that could reduce choice and increase costs for everyone.
That proposal lacked popular support during the Democratic presidential primaries, as one after another of its proponents dropped out of the race. But it helped to revive the idea of creating a so-called national public option that would allow individuals to purchase a public, government-sponsored, insurance plan. Supporters argue that such a system could have mitigated some of the challenges the country is experiencing today.
But a new report, “The Public Option in the 2020 Economic Environment,” from FTI Consulting, suggests that while the pandemic has renewed debate over these proposals, it has also proven the resilience of the American health care system.
Yes, Americans did find the pandemic exacerbated long standing financial and access challenges associated with their health care, particularly for lower-income and minority communities.
However, the consultancy found that health care service providers crisscrossed the country to meet the needs of patients in communities overwhelmed by outbreaks, and many private insurance plans waived out-of-pocket costs to ensure continued access to medical services.
And throughout the crisis, Medicaid, COBRA and the individual insurance marketplaces have continued to function as a critical backstop for furloughed and laid-off Americans, who lost their employer-sponsored coverage.
For the sake of comparison, FTI Consulting compared the current health care system to a hypothetical U.S. health care system with a fully implemented and mature public option.
Among the key findings in the FTI Consulting report are that:
- Under the current system, hospitals are projected to lose $49.6 billion in revenues nationwide in 2020. Under a public option scenario, those losses would exceed $79.2 billion in total. That financial hit to providers would come on top of losses incurred solely as a result of implementation of the public option, the consultancy said.
- Under a public option, losses of commercial insurance revenues would be even greater, amounting to $20 billion for rural hospitals. For providers operating with tight margins – particularly those in rural and underserved communities – such losses could lead to the elimination of critical service lines or even facility closures.
- Any changes in service offerings or in the number of hospitals that remain operational could create access challenges for patients, especially those insured under the public option, living in rural areas or both. Many of these individuals may already have difficulty finding in-network providers or health care facilities close to home.
- Rural areas could be disproportionately impacted given that patients living there are more likely to be older, sicker and to rely on public health insurance. States deemed COVID-19 “hot spots” including California, Texas, Florida, Georgia, and Arizona will experience significant financial consequences as a result of the pandemic.
- Reductions in operating margins under a public option scenario could have serious implications for preparedness efforts. Diminished margins would limit the resources available to expand intensive care units, procure supplies and enhance staffing.
In The News
WASHINGTON (AP) — As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus. The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the... Read More
WASHINGTON — House Ways and Means Chairman Richard E. Neal's attitude toward legislating under a Democratic-led White House might aptly be described as "never let a crisis go to waste." The Massachusetts Democrat wants to take a page from his party's 2009 playbook, when the Obama administration took office amid the wreckage of... Read More
WASHINGTON — When the 117th Congress convenes in January, COVID-19 precautions will prevent the 435 House members from gathering in the chamber together, so opening day festivities of swearing in members and electing the speaker will look a little different. House leaders have begun discussing how to carry out... Read More
WASHINGTON — A top Senate Democrat said Tuesday that she's engaged in bipartisan discussions on COVID-19 aid and urged quick action even if that means "a short-term package for the next few months." "We need to act," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D- Mich., the fourth-ranking Democrat in that chamber... Read More
You can bring wine to Thanksgiving, bring sweet potatoes, bring congealed salad if you must. But you can't bring COVID-19, and that's causing hours-long lines at U.S. testing centers, triggering desperation among people yet to be cleared for the holiday meal. They're waiting outside even as health officials warn... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — All those warnings from public health officials begging Americans to limit gatherings this holiday season amid a surge in coronavirus cases aren't stopping the White House from planning a host of festivities and holiday parties in the midst of a pandemic. Monday's delivery... Read More