GOP Cannot Win Without Cheating

November 21, 2018 by Leonard Pitts

So Georgia voters decided against Stacey Abrams as their governor. Maybe.

With all the shenanigans perpetrated by Republicans in that state, we’ll never know for sure. Had they not passed a restrictive “exact match” law that put 53,000 voters (most of them reportedly African American) in electoral limbo over misplaced commas and transposed letters in their names, had they not purged 107,000 infrequent voters from the rolls in 2017, would she have lost?

No one can say, though Abrams certainly made her opinion clear last week in the non-concession speech that ended her bid to become the first black woman to govern a U.S. state. “Democracy failed Georgia,” she said.

Truth be told, it is failing a lot of places. The nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law reports that 24 states have enacted laws since 2010 to make voting more difficult. These include Photo I.D. laws, laws cutting back on early voting, laws restricting ex-felons from casting ballots, laws requiring street addresses from voters in places where there are no street addresses.

The Republican Party line is that this is needed to fight voting fraud. Which is a lie. Voting fraud exists primarily in the party’s imagination.

No, the truth is that, as this country becomes blacker, browner, gayer, younger, more Hispanic and more Muslim, it is increasingly the case that the GOP cannot win if all voters vote. It cannot win, in other words, without cheating.

Thus it passes laws to reduce voting among people disinclined to vote Republican. Indeed, some party members have explicitly said as much. As in a recent video of Mississippi Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith “joking” — or so her campaign calls it — about what a “great idea” it is to enact laws that “make it just a little more difficult” for “liberal folks” to vote.

Mississippi, of course, is where Andrew Goodman, Medgar Evers, Michael Schwerner, George Lee, Vernon Dahmer, James Chaney and Herbert Lee were murdered because some people thought it “a great idea” to make it “just a little more difficult” for them to vote. Perhaps the senator will forgive those of us who remember that and thus, find it hard to appreciate her sparkling wit.

The Voting Rights Act once provided at least some protection against voter suppression. But in 2013, the Supreme Court cut out its heart, a section that prevented places with a history of discrimination from changing their voting laws without federal approval.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts justified the decision by noting how much progress has been made toward ensuring the right to vote since the Act was passed in 1965. In effect, he said that because the VRA worked, it was no longer needed. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted in her dissent, this was “like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”

In the absence of the Act, Republicans are running riot over African American and other people’s voting rights. This bacchanal of suppression is terribly short-sighted, striking as it does at democracy’s vitals. Put simply: When the integrity and fairness of the vote can’t be trusted, neither can the legitimacy of any government that vote installs.

The GOP is playing with fire. The right to vote must be sacrosanct, the path to the ballot box free from artificial impediments designed to advantage one party over another. Congress must restore and strengthen the Voting Rights Act. Because Ginsburg was right about umbrellas.

And right now, we are getting soaked.

Leonard Pitts is a columnist for The Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Readers may contact him via e-mail at lpitts@miamiherald.com.

© 2018 THE MIAMI HERALD DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.

Opinions

Humility and Civility: More Pols, Please, Like George H.W. Bush Opinions
Humility and Civility: More Pols, Please, Like George H.W. Bush
December 5, 2018
by Christina Paulos

There was once a private school that graded students on the usual academic subjects, plus a fuzzy category related to decorum: “Claims no more than his fair share of time and attention.” Modesty and deference are still enviable... Read More

Ex-White House Correspondent Recalls George H.W. Bush: A Lousy Campaigner and a Deeply Caring Person Opinions
Ex-White House Correspondent Recalls George H.W. Bush: A Lousy Campaigner and a Deeply Caring Person
December 5, 2018
by Christina Paulos

The ones who knew him best use words like decent, caring, patriotic. Former President George H.W. Bush, who died Friday at 94, was a good man. He stood on the U.S. Capitol steps on his inauguration day and said his purpose... Read More

Commentary: My Unforgettable Lunch With President Bush Opinions
Commentary: My Unforgettable Lunch With President Bush
December 2, 2018
by Christina Paulos

President George H.W Bush didn’t like to be asked political questions during lunch, I and the five other journalists who would be seated at his table were warned by the White House staffer in charge of protocol. Read More

Bush’s Footwear Made Big Imprint on Reporter Opinions
Bush’s Footwear Made Big Imprint on Reporter
December 2, 2018
by Christina Paulos

President George H. W. Bush was on his way to the small, stone-walled church where he worshiped while at his Maine home each summer. But first, there was a piece of news that called for his response. Read More

Doyle McManus: George H.W. Bush and the Last Gasp of Moderation In The News
Doyle McManus: George H.W. Bush and the Last Gasp of Moderation
December 2, 2018
by Christina Paulos

George H.W. Bush, who lived a long life of public service, embodied a lost virtue in American politics: the idea of restraint. Bush was a man of modest goals whose often-ridiculed lodestar was prudence, the determination not to make things worse. Read More

Midterms Show Moderates Are Far From Being Politically Extinct Opinions
Midterms Show Moderates Are Far From Being Politically Extinct

For years, partisans and ideologues have assured us that the political center is dead, so don’t bother making persuasive arguments to swing voters. Just get your base out, and may the most “energized” team win. The 2018 midterm elections, however, showed that the center’s demise has been greatly exaggerated. The… Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top