Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Election Despite Alleged Missing Votes

November 1, 2019by Mark Niesse
People line up to vote on election day in November 2018 in Fairburn, Ga. (Brian Cahn/Zuma Press/TNS)

ATLANTA — The Georgia Supreme Court ruled Thursday that there wasn’t enough evidence to further dispute last year’s election for lieutenant governor, which had inexplicably low vote totals.

An election can’t be overturned based solely on unusual vote counts in the lieutenant governor’s race — tens of thousands fewer than in every other statewide election — the court wrote in its 94-page decision upholding a lower court’s dismissal of the case. Specific evidence of illegal or improper votes is required, it said.

The plaintiffs in the case alleged there were about 127,000 fewer votes than expected compared with previous elections, a larger disparity than the 123,172-vote margin of victory for Republican Geoff Duncan over Democrat Sarah Riggs Amico.

“A party contesting an election must therefore offer evidence — not merely theories or conjecture — that places in doubt the result of an election,” according to the court’s 8-0 ruling, written by Justice Sarah Warren. “The petitioners in this case have not carried that burden.”

The lieutenant governor’s race, the second race on the ballot, had substantially lower vote totals than races for less prominent offices such as insurance commissioner, labor commissioner and Public Service Commission member. There were about 80,000 fewer votes for lieutenant governor than the average vote count in 10 statewide contests.

Each side offers competing explanations for the drop-off in votes.

Attorneys for Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, whose office oversees elections, said voters may have decided to skip the lieutenant governor’s race because of the ballot design or because voters thought the candidates for lieutenant governor were running as a ticket with the candidates for governor.

But the plaintiffs said the state’s 17-year-old electronic voting machines could have malfunctioned, or they could have been tampered with, altering vote totals.

“This is just a terrible blow to democracy,” said Marilyn Marks, the executive director for the Coalition for Good Governance, an election integrity organization that originally filed the lawsuit. “This ruling is basically saying that voters, campaigns and candidates have no oversight rights to their elections, which is counter to all democratic principles.”

Raffensperger called on activists to stop making “spurious claims” and fighting Georgia’s election system through the courts.

“This decision should put to rest for everyone except the most partisan activists that the 2018 election results in Georgia were true and accurate,” Raffensperger said. “I remain committed to implementing Georgia’s new, secure paper-ballot voting system in time for the 2020 presidential preference primary.”

The plaintiffs, who are a group of election integrity advocates, wanted to be able to inspect voting machines for problems that could have explained the low vote totals in the lieutenant governor’s race.

Amico, who is now running for the U.S. Senate against Republican U.S. Sen. David Perdue, said the irregularities in the lieutenant governor’s race will motivate her to expand voting rights and enhance election security if elected.

“Widespread voter suppression, vulnerable voting machines and suspicious activity on the part of Republican officials will not quiet those of us who are determined to ensure that every eligible Georgian can cast their ballot in a secure, free and fair election,” said Amico, who was not a party in the case before the Georgia Supreme Court.

An attorney for Duncan, Ed Lindsey, said the electronic voting machines repeatedly passed tests for accuracy.

“There was no actual evidence of hacking or malware impacting the vote count, and the reasons for the difference in voter participation in the lieutenant governor’s race and other statewide races were numerous, non-nefarious and unrelated to the electronic voting system,” Lindsey said.

Georgia election officials are replacing the state’s electronic voting computers with new touchscreens and printed-out paper ballots. The state’s current voting system lacks a paper ballot, leaving no way to check digital election results for accuracy.

Critics of the new voting system say it won’t increase election integrity or guarantee correct results.

They allege in a federal lawsuit that Georgia’s new computer-printed ballots, scheduled to be used statewide in the March 24 presidential primary, will remain vulnerable to hacking, malware, bugs and misconfiguration. Voters won’t be able to detect whether scanning machines accurately record votes, and many voters won’t double-check their printed ballots.

The lawsuit is asking U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg to order the state to switch to paper ballots filled out with a pen.

———

©2019 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta, Ga.)

Visit The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta, Ga.) at www.ajc.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

State News

Atlanta-Based Court Considers School’s Transgender Bathroom Policy Civil Rights
Atlanta-Based Court Considers School’s Transgender Bathroom Policy

ATLANTA — Judges on the federal appeals court in Atlanta on Thursday peppered lawyers with questions in a case that could set an important precedent for bathroom access by transgender high school students. Two judges, both members of the more liberal wing of the 11th U.S.... Read More

Panel Calls for Virginia to Purge 'Explicitly Racist' Laws and 'Segregationist Policies' State News
Panel Calls for Virginia to Purge 'Explicitly Racist' Laws and 'Segregationist Policies'
December 6, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - A Virginia commission tasked with researching racist laws adopted in the state's past recommended Thursday that scores of them be officially repealed, including measures that prevented black voters from casting ballots and prohibited interracial marriage. "The devastating long-term social, economic, and political impact of... Read More

Former Mayor Begins ‘Unprecedented Push’ in Florida on Voter Outreach, Campaign Donations State News
Former Mayor Begins ‘Unprecedented Push’ in Florida on Voter Outreach, Campaign Donations

MIAMI — As part of his effort to help down-ballot Democrats grow their numbers in the Capitol, one-time gubernatorial candidate and former Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum has decided on 21 candidates to endorse and support financially in 2020. Gillum’s Forward Florida political committee expects to spend... Read More

House Democrats to Move on Temporary ‘SALT’ Cap Increase Congress
House Democrats to Move on Temporary ‘SALT’ Cap Increase

WASHINGTON — The House Ways and Means Committee could take up legislation as early as next week that would increase a limit on state and local tax deductions that has riled Democrats from high-cost regions, according to a senior panel member. The “SALT” bill, which has... Read More

New Jersey Legislator Introduces Bill That Would Require Students to Learn Cursive State News
New Jersey Legislator Introduces Bill That Would Require Students to Learn Cursive

PHILADELPHIA — New Jersey’s elementary school students would be required to learn, read and write cursive by the end of third grade, under a bill now in the state Assembly. “In some cases, children are entering middle school without knowing how to sign their own name... Read More

States Appeal Judge’s Decision to Toss Local Tax Deductions Lawsuit Litigation
States Appeal Judge’s Decision to Toss Local Tax Deductions Lawsuit
December 3, 2019
by Tom Ramstack

WASHINGTON - Four states are appealing a federal judge’s September dismissal of their lawsuit challenging federal authority to limit state and local tax deductions. In a filing before the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, attorneys for the states argue the cap unconstitutionally interferes with their... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top