Second Shoe Drops for Palin in Libel Case

February 16, 2022 by Dan McCue
Second Shoe Drops for Palin in Libel Case
Sarah Palin is escorted to her car by Ron Duguay after leaving the courthouse in New York, Thursday, Feb. 10, 2022. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

NEW YORK — The jury deliberating Sarah Palin’s libel suit against The New York Times returned a verdict against her, concluding there was insufficient evidence to prove the newspaper acted with “actual malice” when it published a 2017 editorial erroneously linking her political rhetoric with a mass shooting in Arizona.

The verdict came a day after U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff took the extraordinary step of announcing that he would dismiss the case if the jury found in her favor.

For a time, the Palin case was seen as a major test of New York Times v. Sullivan, the landmark Supreme Court decision from 1964 which stated that in order to sustain a claim of defamation or libel, the First Amendment requires that the plaintiff show that the defendant knew that a statement was false or was reckless in deciding to publish the information without investigating whether it was accurate.

In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice William Brennan, the court ruled for the Times.

When a statement concerns a public figure, the court held, it is not enough to show that it is false for the press to be chargeable for libel.

Instead, the target of the statement must show that it was made with knowledge of, or reckless disregard for, its falsity.

Brennan summarized the standard using the term “actual malice,” although in this case, he meant the phrase to mean with knowledge and gross recklessness rather than intent, since courts found it difficult to imagine that someone would knowingly disseminate false information without a bad intent.

Throughout the trial Palin attorney Kenneth Turkel tried to convince the jury that this and other legal protections accorded journalists are too broad and outdated.

But the Times and James Bennet, the former opinion editor who oversaw production of the editorial argued the editorial was simply a mistake made by human beings working on deadline.

David Axelrod, the attorney for the Times noted that Bennet asked for the opinions of other editors about the piece and said at least eight pairs of eyes at the newspaper went over it before it was posted online.

Where Turkel saw a paper trail in the email exchanges between members of the Times’ staff, Axelrod saw a record of a hastily assembled piece — with no one having time to hatch a malicious plot to defame Palin.

“Pre-publication, no one was aware that this article would be read to imply causation,” Axelrod said.

“There was no conspiracy. It was a mess-up. It was a goof. And yeah, it stinks. But because we value the First Amendment, we tolerate it. Because nothing was done here intentionally,” he said.

Palin is expected to appeal.

Palin’s suit alleged that The Times defamed her with an editorial that incorrectly drew a link between her political assertions and a shooting near Tucson, Arizona, in 2011 that left six people dead and several more wounded, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

Giffords’ district had been one of 20 singled out on a map circulated by Palin’s political action committee underneath digitized crosshairs. However there was no evidence the shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, had ever seen or was motivated by the map.

After his arrest, two medical evaluations diagnosed Loughner with paranoid schizophrenia and ruled him incompetent to stand trial.

The editorial was published on June 14, 2017, the same day that James Hodgkinson, of Belleville, Illinois, opened fire on a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia, where Republican congressmen were practicing for the annual Congressional Baseball Game, injuring several people, including Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana.

The headline was “America’s Lethal Politics,” and the editorial asked whether the Virginia shooting was evidence of how vicious American politics had become. The Times corrected the editorial the morning after it was published after readers pointed out the mistake.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue.

A+
a-
  • Libel
  • New York Times v Sullivan
  • Sarah Palin
  • The New York Times
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Media

    Norman Lear, Producer of TV's 'All in the Family,' Has Died at 101

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Norman Lear, the writer, director and producer who revolutionized prime time television with "All in the... Read More

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Norman Lear, the writer, director and producer who revolutionized prime time television with "All in the Family," “The Jeffersons” and “Maude,” propelling political and social turmoil into the once-insulated world of TV sitcoms, has died. He was 101. Lear died Tuesday night... Read More

    Sports Illustrated Is Latest Media Company Damaged by AI Experiment Gone Wrong

    NEW YORK (AP) — Computer-generated writers ... writing computer-generated stories? Sports Illustrated is the latest media company to see its... Read More

    NEW YORK (AP) — Computer-generated writers ... writing computer-generated stories? Sports Illustrated is the latest media company to see its reputation damaged by being less than forthcoming — if not outright dishonest — about who or what is writing its stories at the dawn of the... Read More

    November 21, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Elon Musk’s X Sues Media Watchdog Over Accusations of White Supremacy

    WASHINGTON — The world’s richest man fired back Monday against his accusers who say he supports white supremacy by filing... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The world’s richest man fired back Monday against his accusers who say he supports white supremacy by filing a lawsuit against the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America. He says in the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas that Media Matters’... Read More

    November 15, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Fox News Producer Sues Network After Refusing to Support Trump

    WASHINGTON — A former Fox News reporter says in a lawsuit moved to federal court this week that he was... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A former Fox News reporter says in a lawsuit moved to federal court this week that he was fired for questioning the television network’s reports that he said were designed to “appease” the Trump administration after the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S.... Read More

    Hollywood Strikes Are Over. Here's When You Could See Your Favorite Stars and Shows

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Missed your favorite actors? After nearly four months of striking, they're coming back. Wednesday's deal between... Read More

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Missed your favorite actors? After nearly four months of striking, they're coming back. Wednesday's deal between striking actors and studios and streaming services won't immediately restore filming to its full swing. That will take months. But the tentative agreement — which both sides... Read More

    AI Raises Fears About Risks to Humanity. Are Tech and Political Leaders Doing Enough?

    LONDON (AP) — Chatbots like ChatGPT wowed the world with their ability to write speeches, plan vacations or hold a conversation as good... Read More

    LONDON (AP) — Chatbots like ChatGPT wowed the world with their ability to write speeches, plan vacations or hold a conversation as good as or arguably even better than humans do, thanks to cutting-edge artificial intelligence systems. Now, frontier AI has become the latest buzzword as concerns grow that... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top