Justice Dept. Reverses Policy on Surveillance of Journalists

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department announced a policy change late last month intended to protect the news media from the long arms of the law.
The new policy bans nearly all subpoenas, search warrants and other legal tactics against journalists while they are gathering the news.
The exception would be if they are acting outside the scope of their authority by engaging in criminal behavior.
The reversal of a Trump-era policy that sometimes allowed monitoring of journalists was welcomed by media organizations.
“This is a watershed moment,” said Bruce D. Brown, executive director of the nonprofit Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. “The new policy marks a historic shift in protecting the rights of news organizations reporting on stories of critical public importance.”
The policy change follows reports last year that the Justice Department sought phone and email records of reporters at The Washington Post, CNN and the New York Times.
U.S. attorneys were investigating the source of news leaks that revealed classified information during the Trump administration.
The Justice Department disclosed the investigations publicly this year, prompting President Joe Biden to call seizure of reporters’ phone records “simply wrong.”
The announcement was met with outrage by media organizations. They said the investigations would put a chill on their First Amendment right to report the news and the public’s right to know.
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland explained the policy change by saying in a statement, “These regulations recognize the crucial role that a free and independent press plays in our democracy.”
He said in a memo to employees that the Justice Manual of guidelines the department follows would be updated to include the revised regulations. Employees who might be affected by them will receive training on them.
The training is supposed to help them balance competing concerns, such as “protecting national security” and “ensuring public safety,” before using surveillance techniques on reporters, according to the Justice Department.
In addition to criminal activity, exceptions to ending the investigations include surveillance of journalists working for foreign governments or affiliated with terrorist groups.
The new policy also does not apply to “an imminent or concrete risk of death or serious bodily harm, including terrorist acts, kidnappings, specified offenses against a minor … or incapacitation or destruction of critical infrastructure,” the Justice Department said.
Tom can be reached at tom@thewellnews.com or on Twitter at @tramstack.
In The News
Health
Voting
Media
NEW YORK – As many as 67 journalists and media workers died violently in 2020, an increase of nearly 50%... Read More
NEW YORK – As many as 67 journalists and media workers died violently in 2020, an increase of nearly 50% from 2021, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. The New York-based nonprofit attributed the increase to the large number of journalists killed while covering the... Read More
WASHINGTON — A multigenerational audience joined Mariangela Zappia, ambassador of Italy to the United States, at the Embassy of Italy... Read More
WASHINGTON — A multigenerational audience joined Mariangela Zappia, ambassador of Italy to the United States, at the Embassy of Italy in Washington, D.C., Tuesday night for a discussion of Gen Z news and social media trends. “They only know a world that is hyperconnected,” Zappia said... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department announced a policy change late last month intended to protect the news media from the... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department announced a policy change late last month intended to protect the news media from the long arms of the law. The new policy bans nearly all subpoenas, search warrants and other legal tactics against journalists while they are gathering the news.... Read More
CHICAGO — This week’s special issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association offers a lengthy and often sobering... Read More
CHICAGO — This week’s special issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association offers a lengthy and often sobering dissertation on the already substantial impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade this past June, and with it constitutional protections to... Read More
WASHINGTON — You always can tell when the “rock stars” arrive at any given event. In this case, the first... Read More
WASHINGTON — You always can tell when the “rock stars” arrive at any given event. In this case, the first indication was the growing murmur outside the meeting rooms on the Independence level of the Grand Hyatt hotel. Almost imperceptible at first to the journalists, college... Read More
NEW YORK — Like a lot of subjects, the conversation around faith and community is a lot harder today than... Read More
NEW YORK — Like a lot of subjects, the conversation around faith and community is a lot harder today than it was in the not-so-distant past. In the bygone, pre-internet age, when local papers thrived, there was no question that faith and religion were going to... Read More