Former Congressman Sues SC Republican Party Over Canceled Primary
COLUMBIA, S.C. — After voting to cancel its party’s primary in early September, the South Carolina Republican Party is facing a court challenge to its decision.
The party was sued Tuesday by the nonprofit United to Protect Democracy on behalf of former Republican U.S. Rep. Bob Inglis and Mount Pleasant businessman Frank Heindel, who said the state’s GOP broke South Carolina law and its own rules by voting to cancel the 2020 Republican primary, according to documents filed in a Richland County court.
“I’m a life-long Republican who has served as both an elected member of the House of Representatives as well as a party official,” Inglis said in a statement released by Protect Democracy, “I’m participating in this lawsuit because the cancellation of the primary by a small handful of party insiders denied me — and every other South Carolina Republican — our voice in defining what the Republican Party is and who it supports. I’m fighting for all of us to get our voices back.”
United to Protect Democracy is a nonprofit focused on executive branch accountability.
Inglis and Heindel argued that, by canceling the primary, the South Carolina Republican Party “deprived” them of the ability to vote for their preferred candidate in “South Carolina’s famous (and particularly influential) ‘First in the South’ primary.”
“It didn’t have to be this way,” the lawsuit reads.
The pair argue that the South Carolina GOP’s executive committee does not have the power to cancel an election on its own. According to state law, to hold a nominating convention, the Republican Party must get a three-fourths vote from the total convention and support from a majority of Republican primary voters.
On Sept. 7, the South Carolina GOP executive committee voted 43-1 to cancel the primary. Chairman Drew McKissick said in a statement after the vote it was not unusual for a party to cancel its primary when it has an incumbent in the White House.
But that isn’t always the case. In 1992, South Carolina held a Republican primary when incumbent President George H.W. Bush was running against conservative commentator Pat Buchanan and former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke.
Inglis and Heindel also argued South Carolina law requires political parties to follow their own rules when it comes to primary elections, and the South Carolina GOP bylaws state that the party must decide “within two years prior to each presidential election year,” whether to hold a primary.
“Instead, the State Executive Committee has chosen which candidate to support by fiat, and in doing so, excluded Republican voters from the process entirely,” the lawsuit reads.
The lawsuit also pointed to a resolution passed unanimously by the Republican Party in 2014 that called for neutrality in the primary process and treating “all campaigns equally.”
But in December, McKissick told the conservative Washington Examiner that, “we’ll end up doing what’s in the president’s best interest.”
The group is seeking a permanent injunction against canceling the primary and asks that the court order the GOP to hold a presidential primary.
Officials from the South Carolina Republican Party “don’t comment on pending legal matters,” spokesman Joe Jackson said.
The lawsuit is the first filed in response to the state Republican Party’s decision to cancel the GOP primary, effectively shutting out President Donald Trump’s opponents — including Mark Sanford, a former South Carolina governor and congressman — from appearing on ballots in the state.
Without a primary, 2020 hopefuls like Sanford, former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld and former U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh would either have to run under another certified political party or submit a petition with the signatures of 10,000 registered state voters. South Carolina does not have an option for write-in candidates for the office of president.
After the vote to cancel the primary, Trump’s Republican opponents voiced their displeasure with the system, publishing a letter in The Washington Post which called for party officials to reinstate primaries in South Carolina, Arizona, Kansas and Nevada.
On Sept. 16, Sanford embarked on a campaign to get the primary reinstated, calling for voters to reach out to the Republican Party and decry the decision. During the speech, Sanford did not rule out taking legal action to get the primary reinstated, saying he was “still looking at any and all options.”
Reached by phone Tuesday afternoon, Sanford reiterated that he had been considering his options for whether to launch his own legal challenge to the South Carolina GOP, but had “heard rumors to the effect that something was happening, and I wanted to wait and see.”
He said he had not spoken to Inglis, Heindel or Protect Democracy representatives prior to them filing their suit, or at any point in this process. Sanford also was noncommittal about whether he would offer himself up as a resource during legal proceedings or if he saw a way to be helpful.
“I’m just watching like everybody else,” Sanford told The State.
Without a Republican primary, Republican presidential campaigns will likely campaign less in South Carolina. Campaign officials told The State they had deprioritized campaigning in the Palmetto State.
The move to cancel the primary has received mixed reactions.
Former U.S. Rep. Arthur Ravenel Jr. disagreed with the decision in a letter to The State, calling political primaries “vital functions of welcome, inclusion and critical information.”
On the other hand, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster’s chief of staff Trey Walker tweeted Tuesday that “SC’s GOP presidential primary is considered a beauty contest and delegates to the GOP national convention are not bound by the result.”
“SC’s delegates are elected at (presidential election) year GOP congressional and state level conventions,” Walker tweeted. “They can vote their conscience.”
Staff writer Emma Dumain contributed to this report.
©2019 The State (Columbia, S.C.)
Visit The State (Columbia, S.C.) at www.thestate.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
LOS ANGELES — In a new twist to one of the most high-profile — and longest — beach access battles in California, Hollister Ranch sued state officials Thursday over a new law designed to open its exclusive coastline to the public after decades of stops and... Read More
ORLANDO, Fla. — The Florida Supreme Court confirmed the status quo for ex-felons in Florida, ruling Thursday they must pay all fines, fees and restitution before their right to vote is restored under Amendment 4. In an advisory opinion following a request from Gov. Ron DeSantis,... Read More
WASHINGTON - Two months ago, Cincinnati City Councilmember P.G. Sittenfeld told attendees at the NewDEAL Leaders Conference in Washington that he had a plan to remove a significant barrier to housing affordability in his city. This week, he and his fellow city council members acted on... Read More
Virginia Delegate Marcia Price has introduced legislation to create an independent redistricting commission to draw new legislative lines after the 2020 census. Delegate Price, whose district includes parts of the cities of Hampton and Newport News, said during a press conference that "redistricting reform must happen... Read More
PHILADELPHIA — Early voting is coming to Pennsylvania in time for the presidential election. Sort of. Under a new law, people will have the option of requesting and submitting an absentee ballot during one in-person visit to county elections offices, starting more than a month and... Read More
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham last week declared the burgeoning space industry is one of her nine economic growth sectors for the state. “New Mexico is truly breaking barriers in the space industry,” the governor said as she opened New Mexico’s first Space Valley Summit... Read More