An Afghan Balancing Act: Ending America’s Longest War vs. Guaranteeing Safety
The longest war in the history of the United States could soon come to an end after reports that the peace negotiations between the U.S. and the Taliban have hit the final stretch.
But concerns about the Taliban’s ability to guarantee safety and prevent Afghanistan from once again becoming a safe haven for terrorists could potentially compromise the ongoing peace talks.
Suhail Shaheen, the Taliban’s political representative in Qatar, said on Wednesday that both sides are in the process of finalizing the peace agreement during the ninth rounds of negotiations.
“We have reached the last point of the agreement,” Shaheen told Al Jazeera. “The final point is the implementation and the mechanism of the deal which is being discussed.”
A peace deal would end America’s 18-year engagement in the country that began shortly after the 9/11 terror attacks. Under the expected terms of the agreement, the U.S. and other foreign forces would gradually withdraw from Afghanistan in exchange for the Taliban’s assurance that the country would not be used as a launchpad for future global terrorist attacks.
Senior U.S. military officials and President Donald Trump, however, have voiced their concerns about a complete withdrawal of U.S. troops.
“You have to keep a presence,” Trump said in a radio interview with Fox News on Thursday. “We are reducing that presence very substantially, [but] we are going to always have a presence.”
The president said he plans to reduce the number of U.S. troops stationed in Afghanistan from about 14,000 to 8,600, and then “we’ll make a determination from there.”
Thomas Barfield, professor of anthropology at Boston University and an Afghanistan expert, said the president’s comments could throw a wrench into the ongoing peace negotiations, which are led by U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad.
“I imagine [Trump’s] guys in Doha are now having a big problem,” Barfield told The Well News. Keeping U.S. troops in the country indefinitely is “the reverse of what the Taliban are demanding,” he said. “I could easily see them walking.”
While Trump’s comments may have compromised the negotiations in Qatar, Barfield understands the president’s unwillingness to commit to a complete withdrawal, given the potential ramifications.
“I don’t think the Taliban have the capacity” to guarantee that Afghanistan won’t harbor terrorist networks in the future, Barfield said. “They haven’t been able to get rid of parts of the Islamic State Khorasan that have shown up in eastern Afghanistan.”
The rise of the Islamic State terror group in Syria and Iraq following the withdrawal of U.S. troops is another cautionary tale that might prolong any Afghan peace negotiations and prevent a military drawdown.
“[President] Obama was going to bring the troops [in Afghanistan] down to zero in 2014,” Barfield said. “It was just going to be an embassy guard that was his plan. But then when you saw what happened in Iraq and Syria, suddenly they backed off on that.”
The issue of whether the U.S. needs to keep a military presence in the region is also a politically charged topic, especially going into the 2020 presidential election.
“If I was an American politician, particularly going into an election, I would ask myself: do I really want to announce that I’ve won a war and then six months down have to explain why I’m going back,” Barfield said.
While the U.S. is keen on getting out of Afghanistan, history shows the potential dangers of a complete U.S. withdrawal are plentiful. An American presence in the region seems to be almost unavoidable.
Without knowing the details of a potential peace agreement, it’s hard to speculate on the future of the U.S.-Afghan relationship, Barfied said. However, he went on to suggest that it will be the ongoing financial and military support the U.S. and NATO give the Afghan government, rather than a set number troops on the ground, that will ensure its future stability.
In The News
WASHINGTON — While much has been studied about President Biden’s first 100 days in office, most of that analysis has focused on how the administration’s actions impact American citizens or relationships with the world’s other great powers, but many wonder about how early actions will affect... Read More
An official from the International Monetary Fund argued this week that the Middle East and Central Asia regions should shift towards a new and inclusive economic model as they emerge from the pandemic, echoing IMF claims that this is the time for a world economic shift. ... Read More
WASHINGTON — Following its recent withdrawal from the European Union, the United Kingdom published an Integrated Review setting out a vision for a renewed role in the world. This comprehensive document also underlines that the U.K. and the U.S. take a different approach to global development... Read More
In the middle of her first day as the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, deep into meetings about inclusivity and diversity in the agency and the rise in coronavirus cases in India, Samantha Power noticed a paper towel slipped under her office door.... Read More
NEW DELHI — President Joe Biden vowed to help Prime Minister Narendra Modi secure medical resources to help India combat the rampant spread of COVID-19 during a diplomatic call on Monday, affirming the United States’ support for its ally after a delay in response drew national... Read More
At a virtual summit on climate change attended by 40 world leaders on Thursday, President Joseph Biden announced that the U.S. would reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by half over the next decade. Biden’s plan promises to lower greenhouse gas emissions 50-52% below 2005 levels by... Read More