Congress Braces Itself for Ruling on State Authority Over Elections

July 29, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Congress Braces Itself for Ruling on State Authority Over Elections
House Administration Committee Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.

WASHINGTON — A congressional panel tried Thursday to prepare for another Supreme Court ruling that could upend conventional thinking, this time on state authority over federal elections.

Depending on how the Supreme Court rules in the case of Moore v. Harper, “That entire apparatus could vanish overnight,” said House Administration Committee Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case last month to decide whether North Carolina’s courts can override the state Legislature’s discretion on voting districts. Democrats accused the state’s Republicans of gerrymandering.

A backdrop issue is former President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election by appealing to state officials to endorse his claim the election was stolen from him through fraud.


The “Big Lie” set off a wave of state initiatives to reform election laws, such as by requiring government-issued identification from each voter and eliminating mail-in ballots. Critics of the reform movement say it could shut out poor and underprivileged persons from the election process.

Under Article 1, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, known as the elections clause, states are authorized to regulate the time, place and manner of elections.

The Supreme Court in Moore v. Harper, along with the House Administration Committee, is trying to decide when states go too far in exerting their authority, perhaps imperiling fundamental principles of democracy in the Constitution.

Carolyn Shapiro, a former Illinois solicitor general and now a law professor, told the committee during the hearing Thursday that there is nothing in the Constitution to suggest the federal government lacks the power to ensure the integrity of elections.

Among measures to guard against runaway state legislatures, Congress is considering setting minimum standards for elections at both the state and federal level.

The primary example is the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. The pending bill would restore parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that have been struck down by the Supreme Court. It would revive the Voting Rights Act’s requirement that states pre-clear fundamental changes to their voting laws with the federal government.

Other portions would grant the U.S. attorney general a right to send federal observers to monitor local elections for fairness and possible ethnic discrimination.


The legislative move in Congress set off complaints among state lawmakers about the federal government trespassing into their jurisdiction. The complaints were echoed by some Republicans during the House hearing.

“This shouldn’t be controversial,” said Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill., as he spoke about state election authority. “The constitution divides authority between Congress and the states.”

Eliza Sweren-Becker, voting rights counsel at the law and policy advocacy organization Brennan Center for Justice, cautioned about the “independent state legislature theory” embodied in the Moore v. Harper case.

Supporters of the theory say authority over elections should be limited to state elected lawmakers, but that courts or appointed administrators have no jurisdiction. Any conflicts between state and federal election laws must be resolved in favor of states, according to its proponents.

Most commonly, independent state legislature theory has come into play in redistricting disputes, such as the gerrymandering allegations in Moore v. Harper.

“There is a wealth of evidence rebutting this independent state legislature theory,” Sweren-Becker said.

She predicted chaos in election laws if the Supreme Court endorses the theory.

“It would be unclear which rules would actually apply,” she said. “Legislatures might try to change the rules for vote counting for example.”

The House committee appears to be departing from a hands-off approach to the separate authority of the Supreme Court as criticism mounts about the conservative supermajority’s recent rulings. 

Top among them is the June 24 decision to overturn the federal right to abortion set out in the 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade.


A day earlier, the Supreme Court expanded private citizens’ right to carry concealed guns outside their homes. The ruling that eliminated the need to prove a specific need for a gun permit followed ongoing public outrage about mass shootings this year.

Tom can be reached at [email protected] and @TomRamstack

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Elections

August 5, 2022
by Dan McCue
Contentious Races, Numerous Candidates Define August's Second Super Tuesday

WASHINGTON — There will be no shortage of names on the ballots in four states as 2022’s elongated primary season... Read More

WASHINGTON — There will be no shortage of names on the ballots in four states as 2022’s elongated primary season continues. Some of the contests have already taken unexpected twists and turns and all, on some level, will be a measure of how Democratic voters are... Read More

August 3, 2022
by Dan McCue
Gerrymandering Makes One Tennessee Primary a GOP Free-for-All

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The fruits of partisan gerrymandering will be on center stage Thursday as 10 Republican candidates vie to... Read More

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The fruits of partisan gerrymandering will be on center stage Thursday as 10 Republican candidates vie to represent the state’s 5th Congressional District, which had been a Democratic stronghold for decades. The district has been represented by Democratic Rep. Jim Cooper since 2003,... Read More

July 29, 2022
by Dan McCue
After a Lull, Primary Season Heats Up With Five Early August Contests 

WASHINGTON — This year’s omicron- and redistricting-attenuated primary season kicks back into high gear next week with contests across five... Read More

WASHINGTON — This year’s omicron- and redistricting-attenuated primary season kicks back into high gear next week with contests across five states after what seemed like a mostly bucolic and restful hiatus from vote counting in July. According to the Cook Political Report, heading into primary day... Read More

July 29, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Congress Braces Itself for Ruling on State Authority Over Elections

WASHINGTON — A congressional panel tried Thursday to prepare for another Supreme Court ruling that could upend conventional thinking, this... Read More

WASHINGTON — A congressional panel tried Thursday to prepare for another Supreme Court ruling that could upend conventional thinking, this time on state authority over federal elections. Depending on how the Supreme Court rules in the case of Moore v. Harper, “That entire apparatus could vanish... Read More

Election Conspiracies Grip Nevada Community, Sowing Distrust

TONOPAH, Nev. (AP) — The Nye County Commission is used to dealing with all sorts of hot-button controversies. Water rights,... Read More

TONOPAH, Nev. (AP) — The Nye County Commission is used to dealing with all sorts of hot-button controversies. Water rights, livestock rules and marijuana licenses are among the many local dramas that consume the time of the five commissioners in this vast swath of rural and... Read More

July 28, 2022
by Dan McCue
Notice of Appeal Filed in Marjorie Taylor Greene Ballot Case

ATLANTA — The epic and so far wholly unsuccessful battle to keep Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., off the November... Read More

ATLANTA — The epic and so far wholly unsuccessful battle to keep Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., off the November ballot took another turn Thursday afternoon as the plaintiffs in the case filed a notice of appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court. In a statement provided... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top