Divided Supreme Court Allows White House to Enforce Green Card Rule

January 27, 2020 by Dan McCue
Protesters rally on the steps of the Supreme Court to Defend DACA. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court split along ideological lines Monday in a decision allowing the White House to proceed with a rule making it harder for immigrants who rely on public assistance to gain legal status.

The unsigned order lifts a nationwide injunction imposed by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, which had put the so-called “public charge” rule on hold while legal challenges worked their way through the courts.

Both the 9th Circuit in San Francisco, Calif., and the 4th Circuit in Richmond, Va., had previously overturned lower court rulings against the policy.

An injunction in Illinois will remain in effect despite the Supreme Court ruling Monday, but it applies only to that state.

In imposing the 2nd Circuit injunction blocking implementation of the rule, U.S. District Judge George Daniels called the policy “repugnant to the American Dream” and a “policy of exclusion in search of a justification.”

Solicitor General Noel Francisco noted in his brief to the Supreme Court that the 9th Circuit “held that the rule ‘easily’ qualified as a permissible interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act.”

As a result of the 5-4 ruling, the administration can now deny green cards to immigrants over their use of public benefits including Medicaid, food stamps and housing vouchers, as well as other factors.

The new policy, which the court’s four liberal justices — Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor — all said they would block, significantly expands the factors used to determine whether an immigrant applying for permanent residency would be an undue burden to the country.

Roughly 544,000 people apply for green cards annually. According to the government, 382,000 are in categories that would make them subject to the new review.

In a concurring opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch urged his colleagues to confront the “real problem” of so-called nationwide injunctions, orders issued by a single judge that apply everywhere.

In this case, even though the administration won rulings in two different appellate courts covering 14 states, its policy could not take effect.

“What in this gamesmanship and chaos can we be proud of?” Gorsuch wrote.

Justice Clarence Thomas joined Gorsuch’s concurring opinion.

Immigration

State Legislatures Are Increasingly Looking To Take The Lead On Immigration
Immigration
State Legislatures Are Increasingly Looking To Take The Lead On Immigration
May 29, 2020
by Gaspard Le Dem

WASHINGTON - In the past decade, many U.S. states have faced labor shortages that have placed a financial strain on local businesses and economies.  With fewer skilled immigrants entering the country and young people losing interest in blue-collar jobs, key industries like construction, health care, and... Read More

US Citizenship and Immigration Services Seeks $1.2 Billion From Congress
Immigration
US Citizenship and Immigration Services Seeks $1.2 Billion From Congress

WASHINGTON — U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has requested $1.2 billion in emergency funding due to a drastic decline in green card and other visa applications that could drain its fee-based coffers by this summer, the agency said Monday. USCIS, the Homeland Security agency that oversees... Read More

With DACA Down to the Wire, Immigrant Health Care Workers Fight the Pandemic as Possible Deportation Looms
Immigration
With DACA Down to the Wire, Immigrant Health Care Workers Fight the Pandemic as Possible Deportation Looms

PHILADELPHIA — When hospital CT technologist Louise Rogenski scans patients known or suspected to have COVID-19, she’s close enough to see the fear in their eyes. She never lets it show that she’s anxious too — and not only because of the coronavirus. In a matter... Read More

COVID-19 and Immigration: Health and Legal Implications of Dealing with the System
Immigration
COVID-19 and Immigration: Health and Legal Implications of Dealing with the System
April 24, 2020
by Kate Michael

WASHINGTON - While COVID-19 is amplifying conundrums in many policy areas, perhaps nowhere has this been more manifest than in the area of immigrants and the U.S. immigration system.  President Donald Trump claimed Wednesday that he had signed an executive order “temporarily suspending immigration into the... Read More

Trump Signs Immigration Order Sharply Different From What He Planned
Immigration
Trump Signs Immigration Order Sharply Different From What He Planned

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed a proclamation on immigration that will restrict some people from entering the country over the next 60 days, but does not shut off applications for permanent residence as he had publicly declared just one day earlier. The order,... Read More

Trump Says He Will Suspend Immigration Green Cards Amid Outbreak
Immigration
Trump Says He Will Suspend Immigration Green Cards Amid Outbreak

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump, citing the economic impact of the coronavirus shutdown, on Tuesday ordered a 60-day ban on new immigrants seeking permanent status in the United States. The ban will cover people seeking green cards that provide permanent status, not temporary visitors. It would... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top